Actors and intentions in the development process of a mobile phone platform for self-management of hypertension

References

• Blake H. Innovation in practice: mobile phone technology in patient care. Br J Community Nurs 2008;13:160,162–5
   Google Scholar
• Blake H. Mobile phone technology in chronic disease management. Nurs Stand 2008;23:43–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MB. Science in democracy: expertise, institutions, and representation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Mol A. The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2224–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:509–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:231–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging: a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet 2011;378:49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD007457
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li LC, Townsend AF, Badley EM. Self-management interventions in the digital age: new approaches to support people with rheumatologic conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:321–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, et al. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD007459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues JJ, Lopes IM, Silva BM, Torre Ide L. A new mobile ubiquitous computing application to control obesity: SapoFit. Inform Health Soc Care 2013;38:37–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker R, Merry S, Dorey E, Maddison R. A development and evaluation process for mHealth interventions: examples from New Zealand. J Health Commun 2012;17:11–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan AG, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, et al. Mobile phone-based remote patient monitoring system for management of hypertension in diabetic patients. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:942–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan AG. Transforming hypertension management using mobile health technology for telemonitoring and self-care support. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:579–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand MA, et al. How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns 2011;82:260–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg J, Ericson L, Timpka T, et al. Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories. J Med Syst 2010;34:107–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry DL, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, et al. Development and evaluation of the personal patient profile-prostate (P3P), a Web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:109–21
   Google Scholar
• Berg M, Adolfsson A-S, Ranerup A, Sparud-Lundin C. Person-centered web support to women with type 1 diabetes in pregnancy and early motherhood—the development process. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15:20–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack I, Saalasti-Koskinen U, Mäkelä M. Decision aid for women considering breast cancer screening. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:357–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehoux P, Hivon M, Williams-Jones B, Urbach D. The worlds and modalities of engagement of design participants: a qualitative case study of three medical innovations. Design Studies 2011;32:313–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi C. The methodology of participatory design. Tech Commun 2005;52:163–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høstgaard AM, Bertelsen P, Nøhr C. Methods to identify, study and understand end-user participation in HIT development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007;23:131–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torsi S, Nasr N, Wright PC, et al. User-centered design for supporting the self-management of chronic illnesses: an interdisciplinary approach. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Corfu, Greece; 2009: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Hoholm T, Araujo L. Studying innovation processes in real-time: the promises and challenges of ethnography. Ind Market Manag 2011;40:933–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010;10:67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J, ed. Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1986:196–233
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker W, Law J, eds. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1992:225–58
   Google Scholar
• Akrich M. The description of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J, eds. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1992:205–24
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Callon M, Muniesa F. Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organ Stud 2005;26:1229–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Hernes T. Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmö: Liber; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Callon M. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law J, ed. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge; 1991:132–61
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson U, Kasperowski D, Ring L, Kjellgren, K. Developing an interactive mobile phone self-report system for self-management of hypertension. Part 1. Patient and professional perspectives. Blood Press; 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.883203
   Google Scholar
• Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Q 2007;71:287–311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2008. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Sabate E, ed. Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Dahlof B, et al. Perceived symptoms amongst hypertensive patients in routine clinical practice – a population-based study. J Intern Med 1998;244:325–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranerup A, Hallberg I, Bengtsson U, Kjellgren K. Mastery and autonomy in medication with a mobile self-report system: a project in action. Adjunct Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Linköping, Sweden; June 6–8, 2012:53–6
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims; 2009. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf [last accessed 28 May 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Sundar SS, Bellur S, Jia H. Motivational technologies: a theoretical framework for designing preventive health applications. In: Bang M, Ragnemalm E, eds. Persuasive Technology design for health and safety. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012:112–22
   Google Scholar
• Horst M. Public expectations of gene therapy: scientific futures and their performative effects on scientific citizenship. Sci Technol Human Values 2007;32:150–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storni C. Multiple forms of appropriation in self-monitoring technology: reflections on the role of evaluation in future self-care. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2010;26:537–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar