Nurses' use of an integrated electronic health record: results of a case site analysis

REFERENCES

• Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health care. A systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1000387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, et al. Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Affairs 2010;29:639–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SS, Adams JL, Schneider EC, et al. Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care 2010;16(12 Spec No):SP64–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. Health Affairs 2010;29:647–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbrook R. Health care and the American recovery and reinvestment act. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1057–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The power of information: putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need. London: Department of Health; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Lau F, Kuziemsky C, Price M, Gardner J. A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Informs Assoc 2010;17:637–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:897–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A, et al. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:746–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:104–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, et al. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int J Med Inform 2009;78S:S69–76
   Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, et al. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2007;76S:S21–7
   Google Scholar
• Campbell E, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:547–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding D, Mitchell N, Randell R, et al. Nurses' use of computerised clinical decisions support systems: a case site analysis. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1159–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, et al. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:82–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne JA, Braden CJ. Definition and relational specification of work-around. 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23–27; Montreal, Canada; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Koppel R, Wetterneck TB, Telles JL, Karsh B-T. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:408–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaro PV, Boxerman SB. Effects of computerized provider order entry and nursing documentation on workflow. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:908–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munyisia EN, Yu P, Hailey D. Does the introduction of an electronic nursing documentation system in a nursing home reduce time on documentation for the nursing staff? Int J Med Inform 2011;80:782–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrington JM, Effken JA. Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events. Comput Inform Nurs 2011;29:360–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner LM, Simons CE, Parker LE, et al. ‘To take care of the patients’: qualitative analysis of Veterans Health Administration personnel experiences with a clinical informatics system. Implement Sci 2010;5:63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SA, Fred MR, Wilcox L, et al. Workarounds used by nurses to overcome design constraints of electronic health records. 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23–27; Montreal, Canada; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Gunningberg L, Fogelberg-Dahm M, Ehrenberg A. Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1557–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakes B, Whittington J. Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time. Comput Inform Nurs 2008;26:234–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kossman SP, Scheidenhelm SL. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput Inform Nurs 2008;26:69–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler C, Ammenwerth E, Wagner A, et al. Effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system on the quality of nursing documentation. J Med Syst 2007;31:274–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:505–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantz MJ, Alexander G, Galambos C, et al. The use of bedside electronic medical record to improve quality of care in nursing facilities: a qualitative analysis. Comput Inform Nurs 2011;29:149–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson JE, Nilsson G. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2012;68:667–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevenson JE, Nilsson GC, Petersson GI, Johansson PE. Nurses' experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: a literature review. Health Inform J 2010;16:63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding D, Randell R, Mitchell N, et al. Experience and nurses use of computerised decision support systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;146:506–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randell R, Dowding D. Organisational influences on nurses' use of clinical decision support systems. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:412–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marc B. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2001;64:143–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MedicExchange.com. Kaiser Permanente Completes EHR Implementation. 2010. Available from: http://www.medicexchange.com/EMR/kaiser-permanente-completes-ehr-implementation.html [last accessed 25 Feb 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Chow MP, Fong V. Nursing leadership and impact, in Connected for health. Transforming care delivery at Kaiser Permanente. In: Liang LL, ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010:69–82
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Staggers N, Clark L, Blaz JW, Kapsandoy S. Why patient summaries in electronic health records do not provide the cognitive support necessary for nurses' handoffs on medical and surgical units: insights from interviews and observations. Health Inform J 2011;17:209–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T, Mair F, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding DW, Turley M, Garrido T. The impact of an electronic health record on nurse sensitive patient outcomes: an interrupted time series analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:615–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: Sage; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997
   Google Scholar