ProstateAnalyzer: Web-based medical application for the management of prostate cancer using multiparametric MR imaging

References

• Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 2012;366:981–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Rajesh A. A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: review. Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:S1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY, et al. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 2008;49:602–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitar R, Leung G, Perng R, et al. MR Pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. RadioGraphics 2006;26:513–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliçkesmez O, Cimilli T, Inci E, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of urinary bladder and prostate cancers. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009;15:104–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging 2008;33:724–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AS, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. Br J Radiol 2009;82:148–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard RL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mri atlas of prostate cancer. New Haven: Springer; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Alonzi R, Padhani A, Allen C. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2007;63:335–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al; European Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villeirs GM, Oosterlinck W, Vanherreweghe E, De Meerleer GO. A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2010;73:352–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Créhange G, Parfait S, Liegard M, et al. Tumor volume and metabolism of prostate cancer determined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3T without endorectal coil reveal potential clinical implications in the context of radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:1087–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Créhange G, Maingon P, Gauthier M, et al. Early choline levels from 3-tesla MR spectroscopy after exclusive radiation therapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer are predictive of plasmatic levels of PSA at 1 year. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:407–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfait S, Walker PM, Créhange G, et al. Classification of prostate magnetic resonance spectra using support vector machine. Biomed Signal Process Control 2012;7:499–508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa C, Schiavina R, Lodi R, et al. Prostate cancer: sextant localization with MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and 11 C-choline PET/CT. Radiology 2007;244:797–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheenen TW, Heijmink SW, Roell SA, et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of human prostate at 3 T without endorectal coil: feasibility. Radiology 2007;245:507–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Rajesh A, Fütterer JJ, et al. Prostate MRI and 3D MR spectroscopy: how we do it. Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1414–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung JA, Coakley FV, Vigneron DB, et al. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology 2004;233:701–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:48–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol 2006;176:2432–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F, et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 2012;62:986–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim R, et al. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 2013;269:482–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Schultze S, et al. Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2014;24:344–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisæter LA, Fütterer JJ, Halvorsen OJ, et al. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy. Acta Radiol 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1177/0284185114531754
   Google Scholar
• Shah V, Turkbey B, Mani H, et al. Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 2012;39:4093–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 2011;59:477–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fradet V, Kurhanewicz J, Cowan JE, et al. Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 2010;256:176–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose S, Oliver A, Mitra J, et al. A supervised learning framework of statistical shape and probability priors for automatic prostate segmentation in ultrasound images. Med Image Anal 2013;17:587–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose S, Oliver A, Martí R, et al. A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2012;108:262–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos PC, Hambrock T, Barenstz JO, Huisman HJ. Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:1719–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll PR, Coakley FV, Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2006;8:S4–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oppelt A. Systems for medical diagnostics: fundamentals, technical solutions and applications for systems applying ionizing radiation, nuclear magnetic resonance and ultrasound. Germany: Publicis Publishing; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Madabhushi A, Dowling J, Huisman H, Barratt D, (Eds). Prostate cancer imaging. Image analysis and image-guided interventions. Lecture notes in computer science; 2011; Toronto, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Kurc T, Janies DA, Johnson AD, et al. An XML-based system for synthesis of data from disparate databases. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:289–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos E, Acuña CJ, Vela B, et al. A database for medical image management. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2007;86:255–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmoush D, Samet H. A new database for medical images and information. In: Proceedings of SPIE – medical imaging 2007: image processing 2007, San Diego, CA
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Araki K, Takada K, et al. The latest MML (Medical Markup Language) version 2.3–XML-based standard for medical data exchange/storage. J Med Syst 2003;27:357–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo J, Takada A, Tanaka K, et al. The development of MML (Medical Markup Language) version 3.0 as a medical document exchange format for HL7 messages. J Med Syst 2004;28:523–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay, J. XML databases and biomedical informatics. Connecticut: University of Connecticut; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Meier W. eXist: an open source native XML database in web, web-services, and database systems. Germany: Springer; 2002:169–83
   Google Scholar
• Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:672–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata C, Oliver A, Torrent A, Martí J. MammoApplet: an interactive Java applet tool for manual annotation in medical imaging. In: IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and bioengineering, 2012, Larnaca, Cyprus: 34–9
   Google Scholar
• Sumathi S, Sivanandam SN. Introduction to data mining and its applications; 29 of studies in computational intelligence. Germany: Springer; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Papadakis I, Chrissikopoulos V, Polemi D. Secure medical digital libraries. Int J Med Inform 2001;64:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Liu BJ. HIPAA compliant auditing system for medical images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2005;29:235–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WB, Lee CD, Ho KI. A HIPAA-compliant key management scheme with revocation of authorization. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 2014;113:809–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provencher W. Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed 2001;14:260–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar