Risk factors for long-term outcome in photoselective vaporization of the prostate

References

• Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, et al. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2013;64:118–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamoulakis C, Schulze M, Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, Scarpa RM, Rassweiler JJ, et al. Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 2013;63:3667–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 2008;53:160–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia SJ, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Han BM, Shao Y, Zhang YN. Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Eur Urol 2008;53:382–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, et al. 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European multicentre randomised trial-the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 2014;65:931–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajbabu K, Chandrasekara SK, Barber NJ, Walsh K, Muir GH. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser in men with prostates of >100 mL. BJU Int 2007;100:593–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T, Reich O, Seifert HH, Gasser TC, et al. Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP): in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol 2007;51:1031–8; discussion 8–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Wyler S, Reich O, Seifert HH, Muller A, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: the Basel experience after 108 procedures. Eur Urol 2005;47:798–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miralles J, Palmero JL, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Osca JM, Benedicto A. Analysis of predictive factors of success for prostate photovaporization in benign prostatic hyperplasia by GreenLight laser. Actas Urol Esp 2013;37:20–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfitzenmaier J, Gilfrich C, Pritsch M, Herrmann D, Buse S, Haferkamp A, et al. Vaporization of prostates of ≥80 mL using a potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser: midterm-results and comparison with prostates of <80 mL. BJU Int 2008;102:322–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A, Chalikopoulos D, Papachristou C, Sopilidis O, Dellis A, et al. Transurethral photoselective vaporization versus transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas >80 ml: 12-mo results of a randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 2008;54:427–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Vricella GJ, Spaliviero M, Wong C. Does size really matter? The impact of prostate volume on the efficacy and safety of GreenLight HPS (TM) laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate. J Endourol 2012;26:525–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 2010;58:384–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangasamy IA, Chalasani V, Bachmann A, Wood HH. Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate using 80-W and 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis from 2002 to 2012. Eur Urol 2012;62:315–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misrai V, Roupret M, Guillotreau J, Bordier B, Bruyere F. GreenLight (R) photoselective vaporisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. Prog Urol 2013;23:77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich O. GreenLight: from potassium-titanyl-phosphate to lithium triborate or from good to better? Curr Opin Urol 2011;21:27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann MF, Naumann CM, Seif C, van der Horst C, Jünemann KP, Braun PM. Functional outcome following photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP): urodynamic findings within 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2008;54:902–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, Kuntz R, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006-2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol 2009;55:1345–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O, et al. GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 2008;54:893–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek RS. GreenLight™ HPS laser therapy for BPH: clinical outcomes and surgical recommendations from the International GreenLight User (IGLU) group. Eur Urol Suppl 2008;7:361–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, et al. A European multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing 180 W GreenLight XPS laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 12-month results of the GOLIATH study. J Urol 2015;193:570–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi T, Hueber PA, Abdollah F, Liberman D, Bhojani N, Gautam G, et al. Short term outcomes of GreenLight vapor incision technique (VIT) of the prostate: comparison of outcomes to standard GreenLight 120W HPS vaporization in prostate volumes greater than 80 cc. Can J Urol 2013;20:6633–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshal AM, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM. Can we predict the outcome of 532 nm laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate? Time to event analysis. J Urol 2012;188:1746–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, Tanriverdi O, Sarica K, Miroglu C. Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 ml: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology 2008;71:247–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynard JM, Yang Q, Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Schafer W, de la Rosette JJ, et al. The ICS-'BPH' study: uroflowmetry, lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. Br J Urol 1998;82:619–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haylen BT, Parys BT, Anyaegbunam WI, Ashby D, West CR. Urine flow rates in male and female urodynamic patients compared with the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 1990;65:483–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hueber PA, Ben-Zvi T, Liberman D, Bhojani N, Gautam G, Deklaj T, et al. Mid term outcomes of initial 250 case experience with GreenLight 120W-HPS photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of prostate volumes <60 cc, 60 cc–100 cc and >100 cc. Can J Urol 2012;19:6450–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich E, Schiefelbein F, Schoen G. Technique and short-term outcome of Green Light laser (KTP, 80W) vaporisation of the prostate. Eur Urol 2007;52:1632–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar