References
- National Institute of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIH, NIDCD). Cochlear Implant technical report. Available at: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/healthhearing/coch.asp.
- Neihart NM, Harrison RR. Micropower circuits for bidirectional wireless telemetry in neural recording applications. Biomed Engin IEEE Transactions. 2005;52:1950–9.
- Lucas HM. Advances in Cochlear Implant Telemetry: Evoked Neural Responses, Electrical Field Imaging, and Technical Integrity. Trends Amplif. 2007;11:143–59.
- Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Utility of electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide. London: Whurr; 2006; p. 245–73.
- Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Kelsay DM, Teagle HF, et al. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioural measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2001;2:471–86.
- Busby P, Plant K, Whitford L. Electrode impedance in adults and children using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3:87–103.
- Synder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity. Hear Res. 2008;235:23–38.
- Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, von Wallenberg E, van Dijk B. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10:105–16.
- Botros A, Psarros C. Neural response telemetry reconsidered. I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting. Ear Hear. 2010;31:367–79.
- Gordon KA, Gilden JE, Ebinger KA, Shapiro WH. Neural Response Telemetry in 12- to 24-Month-Old Children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002;111:42–8.
- American Speech Language Hearing Association: Cochlear Implants (Technical Report). Available from www.asha.orgy/policy, 2004.
- Soliman SM. Speech discrimination audiometry using Arabic phonetically balanced words. Ain Shams Med J. 1976;27:27–30.
- Kotby M, Khairy A, Baraka M, El Shobarry A, Rifaie N. Language testing of Arabic speaking children. In Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress, 1995.
- Clark GM, Shute SA, Shepherd RK, Carter TD. Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:40–2.
- Pfingst BE. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 1990;50:225–36.
- van Wermeskerken GK1, van Olphen AF, van Zanten GA. Comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials. Int J Audiol 2006;45:589–94.
- Carlson ML, Archibald DJ, Dabade TS, Gifford RH, Neff BA, Beatty CW, et al. Prevalance and timing of individual cochlear implant electrode failures. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31.
- Goehring JL, Hughes ML, Baudhuin JL, Lusk RP. How well do cochlear implant intra-operative impedance measures predict post-operative electrode function? Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:239–44.
- Guedes MC, Brito Neto RV, Gomez MV, Sant’Anna SB, Peralta CG, Castilho AM, et al. Neural response telemetry measures in patients implanted with Nucleus 24. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;5:660–7.
- Shallop JK, Facer GW, Peterson A. Neural Response Telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1755–9.
- Spivak L, Aurebach C, Vambutas A, Geshkovich S, Wexler L, Popecki B. Electrical Compound Action Potentials recorded with Automated Neural Response Telemetry: Threshold Changes as a Function of Time and Electrode Position. Ear Hear. 2010;32:104–13.
- Tykocinski, M, Cohen LT, Cowan R. Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26:948–56.
- Cosetti MK, Shapiro WH, Green JE, Roman BR, Lalwani AK, Gunn SH, et al. Intra-operative neural response telemetry as a predictor of performance. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:1095–9.