Influence of abutment design on retention of metal copings cemented to implants

References

• Taylor TD, Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11: 101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee W, Jivraj S. Designing abutments for cement retained implant supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006;201:559–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:401–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller C, Bräger U, Wittneben JG. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complication with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:110–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiessl C, Schaefer L, Winter C, et al. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1179–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1145–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, et al. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:618–625.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begum Z, Sonika R, Pratik C. Effect of different cementation techniques on retained excess cement and uniaxial retention of the implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1333–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakan U, Gultekin P, Guncu MB, et al. Effect of screw access channel filling materials on uniaxial retentive force of cement-retained implant restorations. Aust Dent J. 2014;59:65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, et al. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresciano M, Schierano G, Manzella C, et al. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:594–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl M, Graef F, Taylor TD, et al. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:137–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappelli G, Corso M, Coccia E, et al. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments. Minerva Stomatol. 2008;57:95–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan JP, Nazarova E, Vogiatzi T, et al. Prosthodontic complications in a prospective clinical trial of single-stage implants at 36 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:561–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, et al. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:833–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel N, Livne S, Piek D, et al. Current status of implant-abutment–part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2012;29:19–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicciu M, Bramanti E, Matacena G, et al. FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif S, Susarla HK, Kapos T, et al. A systematic review of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed restorations. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, et al. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1102–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squier RS, Psoter WJ, Taylor TD. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding TA, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL, et al. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:865–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz B, Seidt JD, McGlumphy EA, et al. Displacement of screw-retained single crowns into implants with conical internal connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:803–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfart M, Wolfart S, Kern M. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Felice R, Rappelli G, Camaioni E, et al. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:108–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scacchi M, Merz BR, Schär AR. The development of the ITI dental implant system. Part 2: 1998-2000: steps into the next millennium. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:22–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Avila ED, de Molon RS, de Barros-Filho LA, et al. Correction of malpositioned implants through periodontal surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation using angled abutment. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Siadat H, Hashemzadeh S, Geramy A, et al. The effect of offset implant placement on the stress distribution around a dental implant: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2014;41:646-651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigolo P, Mutinelli S, Givani A, et al. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, et al. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergin S, Gemalmaz D. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rismanchian M, Davoudi A, Shadmehr E. Effect of using nano and micro airborne abrasive particles on bond strength of implant abutment to prosthesis. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:50–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Hess T, et al. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1241–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadig WM, Al Harbi MW. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments. Implant Dent. 2007;16:387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwani C, Goodwin S, Chung KH. Cementing an implant crown: a novel measurement system using computational fluid dynamics approach. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar