Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Siluriformes from the Paraguay River basin, Brazil

References

• Albert JS, Reis RE. 2011. Historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• April J, Mayden RL, Hanner RH, Bernatchez L. 2011. Genetic calibration of species diversity among North America’s freshwater fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108:10602–10607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquilino SV, Tango JM, Fontanilla IK, Pagulayan RC, Basiao ZU, Ong PS, Quilang JP. 2011. DNA barcoding of the ichthyofauna of Taal Lake, Philippines. Mol Ecol Resour. 11:612–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardura A, Linde AR, Moreira JC, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2010. DNA barcoding for conservation and management of Amazonian commercial Fish. Biol Conservat. 143:1438–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett RD, Hebert PD. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 83:481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee MJ, Laskar BA, Dhar B, Ghosh SK. 2012. Identification and re-evaluation of freshwater catfishes through DNA barcoding. PLoS One. 7:e49950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bignotto TS, Prioli AJ, Prioli SMAP, Maniglia TC, Boni TA, Lucio LC, Gomes VN, Prioli RA, Oliveira AV, Júlio-Junior HF, et al. 2009. Genetic divergence between Pseudoplatystoma corruscans and Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) in the Paraná river basin. Braz J Biol. 69:681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlke JE, Stanley HW, Naércio AM. 1978. Current state of sweet water fish systematics in South America. Acta Amazonica. 8:657–677.
   Google Scholar
• Britski HA, Silimon KZS, Lopes BS. 2007. Fish of Pantanal: identification handbook. Brasília: Embrapa technological information.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 10:421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho DC, Oliveira DA, Pompeu PS, Leal CG, Oliveira C, Hanner R. 2011. Deep barcode divergence in Brazilian freshwater fishes: the case of the São Francisco river basin. Mitochondrial DNA. 22:80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro RMC. 1999. Evolution of ichthyofauna in South American water streams: general patterns and possible causal processes. Ecologia de Peixes de Riachos. Oecologia Brasiliensis. 6:139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer CA, Liedke AMR, Bornatto SL, Reis RE. 2007. The phylogenetic relationships of the hypoptopomatinae and Neoplecostominae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I sequences. Bull Fish Biol. 9:51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Costa FO, DeWaard JR, Boutillier J, Ratnasingham S, Dooh RT, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PD. 2007. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 64:272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraris CJ. 2007. Checklist of catfishes, recent and fossil (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes), and catalogue of siluriform primary types. Zootaxa. 1428:1–628.
   Google Scholar
• Frantine-Silva W, Sofia SH, Orsi ML, Almeida FS. 2015. DNA barcoding of freshwater ichthyoplankton in the Neotropics as a tool for ecological monitoring. Mol Ecol Resour. 15:1226–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DE Waard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, et al. 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLos One. 3:e2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Duponchelle F, Nunez J, Garcia-Davila C, Paugy D, Renno JF. 2007. Phylogeography of the piranha genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus: implications for the diversification of the Neotropical ichthyofauna. Mol Ecol. 16:2115–2136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Municipal husbandry production [Internet]. 2013; cited 2015 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/ppm/2013/default.shtm/.
   Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr KC, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, Hebert PD. 2007. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara A, Rodríguez R, Casane D, Côté G, Bernatchez L, García-Machado ERIK. 2010. DNA barcoding of Cuban freshwater fishes: evidence for cryptic species and taxonomic conflicts. Mol Ecol Resour. 10:421–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López HL, Miquelarena AM, Gómez JP. 2005. Biodiversidad y distribución de la ictiofauna mesopotámica. Miscelánea. 14:311–354.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg JG, Covain R, Sullivan JP, Fischmuller S. 2012. Phylogenetic position and notes on the natural history of Pimelabditus moli Parisi & Lundberg, 2009 (Teleostei: Siluriformes), a recently discovered pimelodid catfish from the Maroni River basin. Cybium. 36:105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg JG, Parisi BM. 2002. Propimelodus, new genus, and redescription of Pimelodus eigenmanni Van der Stigchel 1946, a long-recognized yet poorly-known South American catfish (Pimelodidae: Siluriformes). Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila. 152:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg JG, Sullivan JP, Hardman M. 2011. Phylogenetics of the South American catfish family Pimelodidae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) using nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila. 161:153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan R, Iyengar L, Jeffries B, Oerlemans N (Eds.) 2014. Living Planet Report 2014: species and spaces, people and places [Internet]. Gland: WWF International; cited 2014 Oct 10. Available from: http://wwf.panda.org/about our earth/all publications/living planet report/.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya-Burgos JI. 2003. Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna. Mol Ecol. 12:1855–1867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle PB, Cech JJ. 2004. Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. p. 726.
   Google Scholar
• Penn O, Privman E, Landan G, Graur D, Pupko T. 2010. An alignment confidence score capturing robustness to guide tree uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1759–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LH, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2013. Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna? BMC Genet. 14:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LH, Maia GM, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2011. DNA barcodes discriminate freshwater fishes from the Paraíba do Sul River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil. Mitochondrial DNA. 22:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povh JA, Lopera Barrero NM, Ribeiro RP, Lupchinski E, Gomes PC Jr., Lopes TS. 2008. Genetic monitoring of fish repopulation programs using molecular markers. Ciencia E Investigación Agraria. 35:5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. 2007. BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ. 2003. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Edipucrs.
   Google Scholar
• Resende EKD. 2009. Research in network in aquaculture: technological basis for sustainable development of aquaculture in Brazil. Aquabrasil. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia. 38:52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro FRV, Lucena CASD. 2006. A new species of Pimelodus LaCépède, 1803 (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from the rio São Francisco drainage, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyol. 4:411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribolli J, Melo CMRD, Zaniboni-Filho E. 2012. Genetic characterization of the neotropical catfish Pimelodus maculatus (Pimelodidae, Siluriformes) in the Upper Uruguay River. Genet Mol Biol. 35:761–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock J, Costa FO, Walker DI, North AW, Hutchinson WF, Carvalho GR. 2008. DNA barcodes of fish of the Scotia Sea, Antarctica indicate priority groups for taxonomic and systematics focus. Antarctic Sci. 20:253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Roques S, Sévigny JM, Bernatchez L. 2001. Evidence for broadscale introgressive hybridization between two redfish (genus Sebastes) in the North-west Atlantic: a rare marine example. Mol Ecol. 10:149–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso JJ, Mabragaña E, Gonzalez Castro M, Diaz de AJM. 2012. DNA barcoding Neotropical fishes: recent advances from the Pampa Plain, Argentina. Mol Ecol Resour. 12:999–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The Neighbor-Joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger TD. 1988. Optimal unsupervised learning. Neural Network. 1:127.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer SA. (1998). Conflict and resolution: impact of new taxa on phylogenetic studies of the neotropical cascudinhos (Siluroidei: Loricariidae). Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. In: Malabarba L, Reis R, Vari R, Lucena Z, Lucena C, editors. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Edipucrs. p. 375–400
   Google Scholar
• Steinke D, Zemlak TS, Boutillier JA, Hebert PD. 2009. DNA barcoding of Pacific Canada’s fishes. Marine Biol. 156:2641–2647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JP, Muriel-Cunha J, Lundberg JG. 2013. Phylogenetic relationships and molecular dating of the major groups of catfishes the Neotropical superfamily Pimelodidae (Teleostei, Siluriformes). Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila. 162:89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaini JO, Grisolia AB, Prado FDD, Porto-Foresti F. 2014. Genetic identification of interspecific hybrid of Neotropical catfish species (Pseudoplatystoma corruscans vs. Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum) in rivers of Mato Grosso Sul State, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyol. 12:635–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilaça ST, Lacerda DR, Sari EH, Santos FR. 2013. DNA-based identification applied to Thamnophilidae (Passeriformes) species: the first barcodes of Neotropical birds. Revista Brasileira De Ornitologia-Braz J Ornithol. 14:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PD. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol. 74:329–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar