Snapshot of Pharmacy Faculty Quality of Work Life and Productivity

REFERENCES

• Braxton JM, Hargens LL. Variation Among Academic Disciplines: Analytical Frameworks and Research. In: J.C. Smart, ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York, NY: Agathon;1996:1–46.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. 1998 CAPE Educational Out-comes. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/ForDeans/5763_ CAPEoutcomes.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zabriskie MS, Dey EL, Riegle SG. Job satisfaction in teaching: An examination of personal and environmental influences on faculty. AIR Forum paper. 2002. Ac-cessed via ERIC, January 30, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews JG. How we can resist corporatization. Academe. 2006;92(3):16–19.
   Google Scholar
• AACP Issue Brief: Faculty Recruitment and Retention. Available at: http:// www.aacp.org/siteltertiary.asp?TRACKID = search.yahoo.com/search?p = a acp + institu&VID = 2&CID = 880&DID = 6694. Accessed January 28, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nair KY, Gaither CA. Effects of work, non work, and role conflict on the overall life satisfaction of pharmacy faculty. Am J Phann Educ. 1999;63:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Program in Phar-macy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, Available at: http://www.acpe-accredit.org/standards/default.asp. Accessed January 17, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Latif DA, Grillo JA. Satisfaction of Junior Faculty with Academic Role Func-tions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001; 65:137–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter O, Nathiswuan S, Stoddard GJ, Munger MA. Faculty turnover within ac-ademic pharmacy departments. Annals Pharmacother. 2003;37:197–201.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin MH, Desselle SP. Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. In press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Roster of Faculty & Profes-sional Staff, 2004-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud LK, Heck RH. A university's faculty: Predicting those who will stay and those who will leave. J Higher Educ Mgmt. 1994;10:71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Porter LW, et al. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J Appl Psychol. 1974;59:603–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desselle SP, Collins CC, Harrold MW, Kalis MM, Quattrocchi EJ. Consensus within five academic subdisciplines of pharmacy: Progress toward establishing their scientific paradigms. J Pharm Teaching. 2002; 9:27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Huchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:500–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmelch WH, Wilke PK, Lovrich NP. Dimenisons of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national survey. Res Higher Educ. 1986; 24:266–86.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carne-gie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princieton, NJ. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Toutkoushian, RK, et al. Using publications counts to measure an institution's research productivity. Res Higher Educ. 2003;44:121–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Print M, Hattie J. Measuring quality in universities: An approach to weighting research productivity. Higher Educ. 1997;33:453–469.
   Google Scholar
• Desselle SP, Collins CC, Harrold MW, Kalis MM, Quattrocchi EJ. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of consensus within pharmacy's academic subdisciplines. J Pharm Teaching. 2002; 9(4):1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett CW, Matthews HW, Jackson RA. A comparison between student rat-ings and faculty self-ratings of instructional effectiveness. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003; 67: Article no.117.
   Google Scholar
• Forester M, Kahn HI, Hesson-McIrmis MS. Factor Structures of Three Mea-sures of Research Self-Efficacy. J Career Assess. 2004; 12:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In Pajares F and Urdan T (Eds.). Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. (Vol. 5., pp. 307–337). Green-wich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A. Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001; 17:783–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Base 13.0 User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999; 4: 272–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institutional Research Series: 2005–2006 Profile of Pharmacy Faculty. Ameri-can Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Alexandria, VA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli MD, Gregor M. faculty stress: The tension between career demands and having it all. In: Coping with Faculty Stress. Seldin P (Ed.). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser VJ. Faculty members' intention to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Res Higher Educ. 2004;45:285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfgang AP, Gupchup GV, Plake KS. Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. Amer J Phann Educ. 1995;59:342–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham SM. Being a newcoming. In RJ Menges and Associates, Faculty in New Jobs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Holtom BC, McDaniel LS, Hill JW. The unfolding model of voluntary turnover: A replication and extension. Acad Manage J. 1999; 42:450–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Understanding the training needs of department chairs. Aziz S, Mullins ME, Balzer WK. Studies Higher Educ. 2005;30:571–593.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud LK. Women and minority faculty experiences: Defining and respond-ing to diverse realities. In: Gainen J and Boice R (Eds). Building a diverse faculty. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 53. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes ER, Desselle SP. Is scientific paradigm important for pharmacy educa-tion? Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(5):Article no.118.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton TM, Hargens LL. Variation among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research. In Smart JC, Ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh KL. Stress new newly hired, novice faculty: Causes, coping strategies, and interventions for faculty and institutions. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Arizona, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Trautvetter LC. Experiences of men, experiences of women. In Menges RJ and Associates. Faculty in New Jobs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud LK. Des Jarlais CD. Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. Rev Higher Educ. 1994;17:335–53.
   Google Scholar
• Romanelli R, Ryan M. A survey and review of attitudes and beliefs of genera-tion X pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:Article no.12.
   Google Scholar
• AACP Commision to Implement Change in Pharmaceutical Education. Posi-tion Paper 4. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/Educational Resources/3589_BackgroundPaper4.pdf. Accessed, January 30, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Speedie MK, Brouwer KL, Hak LJ, Lathers CM, Thomas J, Smith MD. Chair report for the Research and Graduate Affairs Committee. Am J Pharm Educ. 1982; 46:371–74.
   Google Scholar
• AACP Institutional Research Brief, No. 4. A report on the research and teaching productivity of pharmacy faculty: changes over time and comparisons to faculty of other health professions. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/Docs/MainNavigation/In-stitutional Data/6361 IRBNo4-NIHFundingComparison.pdf. Accessed, January 29, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KM, Romanelli F. Use of an electronic survey to assess the training and practice experiences of pharmacy residency graduates. Am J Health-System Pharm. 2005;62: 2283–2288.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific produc-tivity. Soc Studies Sci. 2005;35:673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen EJ, Noe RA. The mentoring information exchange: When do mentors seek information from their protégés? J Org Behav. 1997;20:233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Noe RA. An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Pers Psychol. 1988;41:457–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler-Hill SE, Bahniuk MH, Dobos I, Rouner D. Mentoring and other com-munication support in the academic setting. Group Org Studies. 1989;14:355–368.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy RH, Gubbins PO, Luer M, Reddy IK, Light KE. Developing and sus-taining a culture of scholarship. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:Article no. 92.
   Google Scholar
• Wutoh AK, Colebrook MN, Holladay JW, Scott KR, Lombardo FA, et al. Fac-ulty mentoring programs at schools/colleges of pharmacy in the U.S. 2000;8(1):61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Haines ST. The mentor-protégé relationship. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:Arti-cle no. 82.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvia LM. Mentoring prospective pharmacy faculty: A seminar series on teaching for pharmacy residents. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article no. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Popovich NG, Peverly SL, Jackson TR. Effectiveness of a weekly faculty con-versation forum about teaching. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006.70:Article no. 100.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, III G. An investigation of pharmacy faculty attitudes toward fac-ulty development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:Article no. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Cocaloas GH. Mentors and mentoring. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62:227.
   Google Scholar
• Mason HL. Collaborators and mentors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65:401–403.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza CM, Draugalis JLR, Skrepnek GH, Slack MH. The role of administrative mentoring in the pharmacy deanship. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article no. 86.
   Google Scholar