References
- Horn SD, Bender SA, Bergstrom N, et al. Description of the National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1816-25
- Cereda E, Gini A, Pedrolli C, et al. Disease-specific, versus standard, nutritional support for the treatment of pressure ulcers in institutionalized older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:1395-402
- Schultz G, Mozingo D, Romanelli M, et al. Wound healing and TIME; new concepts and scientific applications. Wound Repair Regen 2005;13(4 Suppl):S1-11
- Ramundo J, Gray M. Collagenase for enzymatic debridement: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009;36:S4-11
- Milne CT, Ciccarelli AO, Lassy M. A comparison of collagenase to hydrogel dressings in wound debridement. Wounds 2010;22:270-4
- Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11(1 Suppl):S1-28
- Carter MJ. Cost-effectiveness research in wound care: definitions, approaches, and limitations. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010;56:48-59
- Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG. Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Probl Surg 2001;38:72-140
- Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:489-93
- Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen 1994;2:165-70
- Nwomeh BC, Yager DR, Cohen IK. Physiology of the chronic wound. Clin Plast Surg 1998;25:341-56
- Mast BA, Schultz GS. Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases in acute and chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 1996;4:411-20
- Moore J, Jensen P. Assessing the role and impact of enzymatic debridement. Podiatry Today 2004;17:54-6.
- Mosher BA, Cuddigan J, Thomas DR, et al. Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology. Adv Wound Care 1999;12:81-8
- Thomas S, Jones H. Clinical experiences with a new hydrogel dressing. J Wound Care 1996;5:132-3
- Mulder GD. Cost-effective managed care: gel versus wet-to-dry for debridement. Ostomy Wound Manage 1995;41:68-70
- Ayello EA, Cuddigan J, Kerstein MD. Skip the knife: debriding wounds without surgery. Nursing 2002;32:58-63; quiz 64
- Vowden KR, Vowden P. Wound debridement, part 2: sharp techniques. J Wound Care 1999;8:291-4
- Vowden KR, Vowden P. Wound debridement, part 1: non-sharp techniques. J Wound Care 1999;8:237-40
- Turner T. The development of wound management products. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, eds. Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for healthcare professionals. 3rd edn. Wayne, PA: HMP Communications, 2001
- Milne CT, Ciccarelli AO, Lassy M. A comparison of collagenase to hydrogel dressings in maintenance debridement and wound closure. Wounds 2012;24:317-22
- Muller E, van Leen MW, Bergemann R. Economic evaluation of collagenase-containing ointment and hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19:1209-16
- Bergemann R, Lauterbach KW, Vanscheidt W, et al. Economic evaluation of the treatment of chronic wounds: hydroactive wound dressings in combination with enzymatic ointment versus gauze dressings in patients with pressure ulcer and venous leg ulcer in Germany. Pharmacoeconomics 1999;16:367-77
- Richardson WS, Detsky AS. Users' guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995;273:1292-5
- Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993;13:322-38
- Rogers LC, Bevilacqua NJ, Armstrong DG, et al. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:799-802
- Briggs AH, Goeree R, Blackhouse G, et al. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Decis Making 2002;22:290-308
- Briggs AH, Ades AE, Price MJ. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for decision trees with multiple branches: use of the Dirichlet distribution in a Bayesian framework. Med Decis Making 2003;23:341-50
- Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;17:479-500