Evaluating and Managing Tramp Shipping Lines Performances: A New Methodology Combining Balanced Scorecard and Network DEA

References

• Amado C.A.F., Santos S.P., Marques P.M., Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2012, 40(3):390–403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asosheh A., Nalchigar S., Jamporazmey M., Information technology project evaluation: an integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(8):5931–5938
   Google Scholar
• Banker R.D., Chang H.H., Janakiraman S.N., Konstans C., A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics, European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154(2):423–436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagwat B., Sharma M.K., Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2007, 53(1):43–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C., Yan H., Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2011, 213(1):147–155
   Google Scholar
• Chen C.L., Zhu J., Yu J.Y., Noori H., A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2012, 221(2):348–359
   Google Scholar
• Chiang C.Y., Lin B., An integration of balanced scorecards and data envelopment analysis for firm’s benchmarking management, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2009, 20(11):1153–1172
   Google Scholar
• Chilingerian J., Sherman H.D., Cooper W.W., Seiford L., Zhu J., Health Care Applications - From hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers, Handbook of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), 2011, 2nd Edition, chapter 16, Springer, pp.445–493
   Google Scholar
• Cook W.D., Zhu J., Bi G.B., Yang F., Network DEA: additive efficiency decomposition, European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(2):1122–1129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane K., Wang T.F., Song D.W., Ji P., The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2006, 40(4):354–374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle J., Green R., Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45(5):567–578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A., Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology, European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172(3):1018–1039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A., R&D project evaluation: an integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2008, 36(5):895–912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe R., Grosskopf S., Network DEA, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34(1):35–49
   Google Scholar
• Fang H.H., Lee H.S., Hwang S.N., Chung C.C., A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: An alternative approach, OMEGA - The International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41(4):731–734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama H., Mirdehghan S.M., Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(1):85–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Valderrama T., Mulero-Mendigorri E., Revuelta-Bordoy D., Relating the perspectives of the balanced scorecard for R&D by means of DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3):1177–1189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauld R., Al-wahaibi S., Chisholm J., Crabbe R., Kwon B., Oh T., Palepu R., Rawcliffe N., Sohn S., Scorecards for health system performance assessment: The New Zealand example, Health Policy, 2011, 103(2–3):200–208
   Google Scholar
• Grigoroudis E., Orfanoudaki E., Zopounidis C., Strategic performance measurement in a healthcare organisation: A multiple criteria approach based on balanced scorecard, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2012, 40(1):104–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houck M., Speaker P.J., Fleming A.S., Riley R.A.Jr., The balanced scorecard: Sustainable performance assessment for forensic laboratories, Science & Justice, 2012, 52(4):209–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh L.F., Lin L.H., A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan-An application of the relational network DEA, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2010, 29(1):14–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C.W., Hu A.H., Chiou C.Y., Chen T.C., Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(10):12891–12899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S.N., Chen C., Chen Y., Lee H.S., Shen P.D., Sustainable design performance evaluation with applications in the automobile industry: focusing on inefficiency by undesirable factors, OMEGA - The International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41(3):553–558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S.N., Lee H.S., Tang S.C., Hsu S.S., Measuring quality of life using DEA-AR: focusing on undesirable factors, INFOR, 2014, 51(2):84–91
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., The balanced scorecard-Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70(1):71–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, 1996, Boston, Harvard Business School Press
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarotti V., Manzini R., Mari L., A model for R&D performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(1):212–223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H.S., Zhu J., Super-efficiency Infeasibility and Zero Data in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216(2):429–433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H.S., Chu C.W., Zhu J., Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(1):141–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H.S., Tzeng G.H., Yeih W., Wang Y.J., Yang S.C., Revised DEMATEL: resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(10–11):6746–6757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano S., Scale and cost efficiency analysis of networks of processes, Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(6):6612–6617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano S., Gutiérrez E., Moreno P., Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(4):1665–1676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews K., Risk management and managerial efficiency in Chinese banks: a network DEA framework, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41(2):207–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meera S.N., Development of Indian shipping during five year plans, Finance India, 2005, 19(4):1337–1364
   Google Scholar
• Michalska J., The usage of the balanced scorecard for the estimation of the enterprise’s effectiveness, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 162–163751–758
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa M., Benchmarking top Arab banks’ efficiency through efficient frontier analysis, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2007, 107(6):802–823
   Google Scholar
• Panayides P.M., Lambertides N., Savva C.S., The relative efficiency of shipping companies, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(5):681–694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón N., Ruiz J.L., Sirvent I., On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations, European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3):1564–1572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz J.L., Sirvent I., On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations, European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 223(3):732–738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel H., Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132(2):400–410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton T.R., Silkman R.H., Hogan A.J., Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986, 1986(32):73–105
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M.J., Yu S.J., Performance based stratification and clustering for benchmarking of container terminals, Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(3):5016–5022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman H.D., Zhu J.Service Productivity Management: Improving Service Performance using Data Envelopment Analysis, 2006, BostonSpringer
   Google Scholar
• Stepchenkova S., Tang L., Jang S.C., Kirilenko A.P., Morrison A.M., Benchmarking CVB website performance: Spatial and structural patterns, Tourism Management, 2010, 31(5):611–620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation, Market Observation Post System http://newmopsov.twse.com.tw (2009), Accessed on 29 October 2012
   Google Scholar
• Wang H.S., Lee H.S., The impact of navigation safety in Kaohsiung harbor, Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 2012a, 11(1):45–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H.S., Lee H.S., Evaluating navigation safety for harbours in Taiwan: An empirical study, Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 2012b, 11(3):31–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C.R., Lin C.T., Tsai P.H., Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks, European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(2):971–979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H.Y., Lin Y.K., Chang C.H., Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard, Evaluation and Program Planning, 2011, 34(1):37–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie B.C., Fan Y., Qu Q.Q., Does generation form influence environmental efficiency performance? An analysis of China’s power system, Applied Energy, 2012, 96261–271
   Google Scholar
• Yang C., Liu H.M., Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: a network DEA, Economic Modelling, 2012, 29(2):450–461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M.M., Fan C.K., Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: a mixed structure network DEA model, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2009, 45(3):501–515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M.M., Lin E.T., Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2008, 36(6):1005–1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y., Triantis K., Murray-Tuite P., Edara P., Performance measurement of a transportation network with a downtown space reservation system: a network-DEA approach, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(6):1140–1159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar