Interpretation of Statistical Preference in Terms of Location Parameters

References

• M.A. Arcones, P.H. Kvam and F.J. Samaniego, Nonparametric Estimation of a Distribution Subject to a Stochastic Precedence Constraint, Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (2002) 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. B. Atkinson, On the Measurement of Poverty, Econometrica 55 (1987) 749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ballestero and A. García-Bernabeu, Portfolio selection with multiple time horizons: a mean variance-stochastic goal programming approach, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 50 (2012) 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Belzunce, J. A. Mercader, J. M Ruiz and F. Spizzichino, Stochastic comparisons of multivariate mixture models, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100 (2009) 1657–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ben Abdelaziz, R. El Fayed and A. Rao, A discrete stochastic goal program for Portfolio selection: the case of United Arab Emirates equity market, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 47 (2009) 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• P. J. Boland, M. Hollander, K. Joag-Dev and S. Kochar, Bivariate dependence properties of order statistics, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 56 (1996) 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. J. Boland, H. Singh and B. Cukic, The stochastic precedence ordering with applications in sampling and testing, J. of Appl. Prob. 41 (2004) 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C-L. Chang, J-A. Jiménez-Martín, E. Maasoumi and T. Pérez-Amaral, A stochastic dominance approach to financial risk management strategies, Journal of Econometrics 187 (2015) 472–485.
   Google Scholar
• B. De Baets and H. De Meyer, On the cycle-transitive comparison of artificiall coupled random variables, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 47 (2008) 306–322.
   Google Scholar
• B. De Baets, H. De Meyer and K. De Loof, On the cycle-transitivity of the mutual rank probability relation of a poset, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161 (2010) 2695–2708.
   Google Scholar
• H. De Meyer, B. De Baets and B. De Schuymer, On the transitivity of the comonotonic and countermonotonic comparison of random variables, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 98 (2007) 177–193.
   Google Scholar
• B. De Schuymer, H. De Meyer ans B. De Baets, A fuzzy approach to stochastic dominance of random variables, in: T. Bildi, B. De Baets and O. Kaynak eds., Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2715, (Springer, 2003a) 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• B. De Schuymer, H. De Meyer and B. De Baets, Cycle-transitive comparison of independent random variables, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 96 (2005) 352–373.
   Google Scholar
• B. De Schuymer, H. De Meyer, B. De Baets and S. Jenei, On the cycle-transitivity of the dice model, Theory and Decision 54 (2003b) 261–285.
   Google Scholar
• D. Dubois, H. Fargier and P. Perny, Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: An axiomatic approach, Artificial Intelligence 148 (2003) 219–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. F. Escudero, J. F. Monge and D. Romero Morales, An SDP approach for multiperiod mixed 0–1 linear programming models with stochastic dominance constraints for risk management, Computers & Operations Research 58 (2015) 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• M. Finkelstein, On stochastic comparisons of population densities and life expectancies, Demographic Research 13 (2005) 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• T. Hu and C. Xie, Negative dependence in the balls and binds experiment with applications to order statistics, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 97 (2006) 1342–1354.
   Google Scholar
• K. Huang and S. Ahmed, On a multi-stage stochastic programming model for inventory planning, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 46 (2008) 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kaur, B. L. S. Prakasa Rao, H. Singh, Testing for second-order stochastic dominance of two distributions, Econometric Theory 10 (1994) 849–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Le Breton, A. Michelangeli and E. Peluso, A stochastic dominance approach to the measurement of discrimination, Journal of Economic Theory 147 (2012), 1342–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. L. Lehmann, Ordering families of distributions, Ann. Math. Statist. 26 (1955), 399–419.
   Google Scholar
• H. Levy, Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis, Management Science 38 (1992) 555–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Levy, Stochastic dominance, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• M. Levy and H. Levy, Testing for risk aversion: a stochastic dominance approach, Economics Letters 71 (2001) 233–240.
   Google Scholar
• X. Li and X. Hu, Some new stochastic comparisons for redundancy allocations in series and parallel systems, Statistics and Probability Letters 78 (2008) 3388–3394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Montes, Comparison of alternatives under uncertainty and imprecision, PhD Thesis, University of Oviedo, Spain (2014).
   Google Scholar
• I. Montes, D. Martinetti, S. Díaz and S. Montes, Statistical preference as a tool in Consensus Process, in: E. Herrera-Viedma, J.L García-Lapresta, J. Kacprzyk, H. Nurmi, M. Fedrizzi, S. Zadrozny eds., Consensual Processes, (Springer, 2010a).
   Google Scholar
• I. Montes, E. Miranda and S. Montes, Decision making with imprecise probabilities and utilities by means of statistical preference and stochastic dominance, European Journal of Operational Research 234 (2014a) 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• I. Montes, E. Miranda and S. Montes, Stochastic dominance with imprecise information, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 71 (2014b) 88–886.
   Google Scholar
• S. Montes, D. Martinetti, I. Montes and S. Díaz, Min-transitivity of graded comparisons for random variables, in Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE 2010, Barcelona-Spain, 2010b.
   Google Scholar
• A. Müller and D. Stoyan, Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (Wiley, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• W. Ogryczak, A. Ruszczyński, From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations and risk measures, European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1999) 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shaked and J. G. Shanthikumar, Stochastic Orders and Their Applications (Academia Press, Boston, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• M. Shaked and J. G. Shanthikumar, Stochastic Orders (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• R. Szekli, Stochastic ordering and dependence in applied probability (Springer, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• C. Tan, W. H. Ip and X. Chen, Stochastic multiple criteria decision making with aspiration level based on prospect stochastic dominance, Knowledge-Based Systems 70 (2014) 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• G. A. Whitmore and M. C. Findlay, Stochastic dominance: An approach to decision-making under risk (Lexington Books, 1978).
   Google Scholar
• C. Wrather and P. L. Yu, Probability Dominance in Random Outcomes, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 36 (1982) 315–334.
   Google Scholar
• R. R. Yager and N. Alajlan, Probability weighted means as surrogates for stochastic dominance in decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems 66 (2014) 92–98.
   Google Scholar