Effects of Changing Object Size During Prehension

REFERENCES

• Bate , P. J. and Hoffmann , E. R. 1995 . “ Limiting motions in prehension ” . In Motor control and sensory motor integration: Issues and directions , Edited by: Glencross , D. J. and Piek , J. P. 383 – 407 . Amsterdam : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• Bootsma , R. J. , Marteniuk , R. G. , MacKenzie , C. L. and Zaal , F. T. J. M. 1994 . The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: Effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics . Experimental Brain Research , 98 : 535 – 541 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner , E. and Smeets , J. B. J. 1997 . Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position . Journal of Motor Behavior , 29 : 297 – 310 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock , D. and Grossberg , S. 1988 . Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed accuracy properties during trajectory formation . Psychological Review , 95 : 49 – 90 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello , U. , Bennett , K. M. B. and Stelmach , G. E. 1993 . Reach to grasp: The natural response to perturbation of object size . Experimental Brain Research , 94 : 163 – 178 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day , B. L. and Lyon , I. N. 2000 . Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target . Experimental Brain Research , 130 : 159 – 168 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flash , T. and Henis , E. 1991 . Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets . Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 3 : 220 – 230 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilucci , M. , Chieffi , S. , Scarpa , M. and Castiello , U. 1992 . Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: Effects of visual perturbation . Behavioural Brain Research , 47 : 71 – 82 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard , P. 1991 . The coordination of human prehension Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, England
   Google Scholar
• Haggard , P. 1994 . “ Perturbation studies of coordinated prehension ” . In Insights into the reach and grasp movement , Edited by: Bennett , S. J. and Castiello , U. 151 – 170 . Amsterdam : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• Hoff , B. and Arbib , M. A. 1993 . Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp . Journal of Motor Behavior , 25 : 175 – 192 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod , M. 1981 . “ Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects ” . In Attention and performance , Edited by: Long , J. and Baddeley , A. D. Vol. IX , 153 – 169 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod , M. 1999 . Visuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension . Human Movement Science , 18 : 201 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , D. and Todorov , E. 2007 . Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control . Journal of Neuroscience , 27 : 9354 – 9368 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteniuk , R. G. , Leavitt , J. L. , MacKenzie , C. L. and Athènes , S. 1990 . Functional-relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task . Human Movement Science , 9 : 149 – 176 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulignan , Y. , Jeannerod , M. , MacKenzie , C. L. and Marteniuk , R. G. 1991 . Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: 2. The effects of changing object size . Experimental Brain Research , 87 : 407 – 420 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulignan , Y. , MacKenzie , C. , Marteniuk , R. and Jeannerod , M. 1990 . The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension . Experimental Brain Research , 79 : 431 – 435 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulignan , Y. , MacKenzie , C. L. , Marteniuk , R. G. and Jeannerod , M. 1991 . Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: The effects of changing object position . Experimental Brain Research , 83 : 502 – 512 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy , A. C. , Paulignan , Y. , Meunier , M. and Boussaoud , D. 2006 . Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: Effects of perturbation of object size and location . Experimental Brain Research , 169 : 182 – 193 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöner , G. 1990 . A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement . Biological Cybernetics , 63 : 257 – 270 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets , J. B. J. and Brenner , E. 1999 . A new view on grasping . Motor Control , 3 : 237 – 271 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soechting , J. F. and Lacquaniti , F. 1983 . Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location . Journal of Neurophysiology , 49 : 548 – 564 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa , A. and Bullock , D. 2003 . A neural network simulating human reach-grasp coordination by continuous updating of vector positioning commands . Neural Networks , 16 : 1141 – 1160 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Kamp , C. and Zaal , F. T. J. M. 2007 . Prehension is really reaching and grasping . Experimental Brain Research , 182 : 27 – 34 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaal , F. T. J. M. , Bootsma , R. J. and van Wieringen , P. C. W. 1999 . Dynamics of reaching for stationary and moving objects: Data and model . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 25 : 149 – 161 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar