Contrast Sensitivity in Occupational and Environmental Neurotoxicology: What Does it Really Mean?

References

• Miller D, Magnante PC Optics of the normal eye. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, eds. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004:53.
   Google Scholar
• Woods RL, Woods JM The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom. 1995;78:43-57.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Johnstone JR, Ross J An explanation of the visibility of low frequency grating. Vision Res. 1971;11:723-730.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FW, Green DG Optical and retinal factors effecting visual resolution. J Physiol.1965;181:576-593.
   Google Scholar
• Maudgal PC, Stout RWO, Van Balen ATM VCTS chart evaluation as a screening test. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;69:399-405.
   Google Scholar
• Stifter E, Sacu S, Thaler A, Weghaupt H Contrast acuity in cataracts of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5412-5522.
   Google Scholar
• Bulens C, Meerwaldt JD, Van der Wildt GJ Effect of stimulus orientation on contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1988;38:76-81.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61:403-407.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin GS Reliability and sensitivity of clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Clin Vision Sci. 1988;2:167-177.
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Kishi R, Kasai S, et al. Visual dysfunction in workers exposed to a mixture of organic solvents. Neurotoxicology. 2003;24:703-710.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2003;16:171-177.
   Google Scholar
• Buhren J, Terzi E, Bach M, et al. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:290-298.
   Google Scholar
• Thayaparan K, Crossland MD, Rubin GS Clinical assessment of 2 novel contrast sensitivity charts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:749-752.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue AM, Dryson EW, Wynn-Williams G Contrast sensitivity in organic solvent induced chronic toxic encephalopathy. J Occup Environ Med. 1995;37:1357-1563.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler RM, Gysens S, Hartney C Neuropsychological effects of ethylene dichloride exposure. Neurotoxicology. 2003;24:553-562.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber JS, Hudnell HK, Geller AM, et al. Apartment residents' and day care workers' exposures to tetrachloroethylene and deficits in visual contrast sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:655-664.
   Google Scholar
• Frennette B, Mergler D Contrast-sensitivity loss in a group of former microelectronic workers with normal visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:556-560.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler RM, Lezak M, Booty A, et al. Neuropsychological dysfunction, mood disturbance, and emotional status of munitions workers. Appl Neuropsychol. 2001;8:74-90.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckelmann I, Pfister EA Influence of occupational exposure to organic solvent mixtures on contrast sensitivity in printers. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:25-33.
   Google Scholar
• Reif JS, Burch JB, Nuckols JR, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of exposure to trichloroethylene through a municipal water supply. Environ Res. 2003;93:248-258.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo L, Baldwin M, Sassine M-P, Mergler D Cumulative exposure to styrene and visual functions. Am J Ind Med. 2001;39:351-360.
   Google Scholar
• Dick R, Steenland K, Krieg EF, Hines CJ Evaluation of acute sensory-motor effects and test sensitivity using termiticide workers exposed to chlorpyrifos. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2001;23:381-393.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock EM, Dick R, Krieg EF Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of 2 FACT test types. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26:271-277.
   Google Scholar
• Lebel J, Mergler D, Branches F, et al. Neurotoxic effects of low-level methylmercury contamination in the Amazonian Basin. Environ Res. 1998;79:20-32.
   Google Scholar
• Walkowiak J, Altmann L, Kramer U, et al. Cognitive and sensorimotor functions in 6-year-old children in relation to lead and mercury levels: adjustment for intelligence and contrast sensitivity in computerized testing. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1998;20:511-521.
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean P, White RF, Sullivan K, et al. Impact of contrast sensitivity performance on visually presented neurobehavioral tests in mercury-exposed children. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;23:141-146.
   Google Scholar
• Grattan LM, Oldach D, Perl TM, et al. Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates. Lancet. 1998;352:532-539.
   Google Scholar
• Swinker M, Koltai D, Wilkins J, et al. Estuary-associated syndrome in North Carolina: an occupational prevalence study. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:21-26.
   Google Scholar
• Swinker M, Tester P, Koltai Attix D, Schmechel D Human health effects of exposure to Pfiesteria piscicida: a review. Microbes Infect. 2002;4:751-762.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker RC, Hudnell HK Possible estuary-associated syndrome: symptoms, vision and treatment. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:539-545.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker RC Residential and recreational acquisition of possible estuary associated syndrome: a new approach to successful diagnosis and treatment. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(suppl 5):791-796.
   Google Scholar
• Swinker M, Burke WA Visual contrast sensitivity as a diagnostic tool. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:A120-A123.
   Google Scholar
• Hudnell HK, House D, Schmid J, et al. Human visual function in the North Carolina clinical study on possible estuary-associated syndrome. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2001;62:575-594.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker RC, House DE A time-series study of sick building syndrome: chronic, biotoxin-associated illness from exposure to waterdamaged buildings. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;27:29-46.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker RC, House DE Sick building syndrome (SBS) and exposure to water-damaged buildings: time series study, clinical trial and mechanisms. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28:573-588.
   Google Scholar
• Woods RL, Thomson WD A comparison of psychometric method for measuring the contrast sensitivity of experienced viewers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;8:401-415.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman RS, Packer M, Fine IH Contrast sensitivity and laser in situ keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003;43:93-100.
   Google Scholar
• Wesner MF, Tan J Contrast sensitivity in seasonal and nonseasonal depression. J Affect Disord. 2006;95:19-28.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson ME, Andre JT, Tyrell RA, et al. Effects of moderate dose alcohol on visual contrast sensitivity for stationary and moving targets. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:261-266.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson P, Timney B Effects of moderate blood alcohol concentrations on spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59:163-173.
   Google Scholar