Student Evaluation Of College Teaching: A Practice In Search Of Principles

References

• Ruskai, M. B. 1996. Evaluating student evaluations. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 44 (3): 308.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, P. 1990. Some considerations regarding teaching evaluations. Political Science Teacher 3 (4): 1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T. J. 2000. Embracing student evaluations of teaching: A case study. Teaching Sociology 28 (2): 140-47.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H. 1930. To what extent do grades influence student ratings of instructors? Journal of Educational Psychology 21:314-16.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., R. P. Perry, and L. Leventhal. 1982. The relationship between student personality characteristics, teacher ratings, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 74:111-25.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. V. 1997. Student evaluations: The ratings game. Inquiry 1 (2): 10-16.
   Google Scholar
• Aleamoni, L. M. 1999. Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13:153-66.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A. 1990. Classroom assessment: Improving learning quality where it matters most. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 42 (Summer): 71-82.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A. 1991. Ten easy pieces: Assessing higher learning in four dimensions. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 46 (Summer): 17-31.
   Google Scholar
• d'Apollonia, S., and P. Abrami. 1996. Variables moderating the validity of student ratings of instruction: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• d'Apollonia, S., and P. Abrami. 1997. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52: 1198-208.
   Google Scholar
• Dowell, D. A., and J. A. Neal. 1982. A selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 53(1):51-62.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, K. O., Jr. 1983. Evaluating teaching. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, K. O., Jr., and S. E. Whitely. 1974. Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching. American Educational Research Journal 11:259-74.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A., and F. R. Creech. 1976. The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. Project rep. no. 76-1. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A., and N. B. Gaubatz. 2000. Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71 (1): 17-33.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research 51:281-309.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, K. P. 1990. Making teaching more effective. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience 2 (2): 59-74.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, K. P. 2001. Motivation: Er Will that be on the test? Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., and S. d'Apollonia. 1990. The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. In Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice, ed. M. Theall and J. Franklin, 97-111. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., S. d'Apollonia, and P. A. Cohen. 1990. The validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:219-31.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. 1991. The effects of anonymity and manipulated grades on student ratings of instructors. Community College Review 18:48-53.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, G. C., and H. H. Remmers. 1927. A rating scale for instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision 13:399-406.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, D., and J. Austin. 2002. Using Blackboard to survey students at midterm. ERIC, ED 464619.
   Google Scholar
• Bastick, T. 2002a. Assessing the quality of teaching in tertiary institutions. ERIC, ED 465781.
   Google Scholar
• Bastick, T. 2002b. The alignment method of measuring quality teaching at tertiary level. ERIC, ED 465783.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1989. Classroom research for teaching assistants. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 39 (Fall): 99-108.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A. 1995. Classroom assessment for critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology 21 (1): 6-7.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A. 1996. Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 65 (Spring): 57-64.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C. 1993. Using student rating norm groups for summative evaluation. Evaluation and Faculty Development 13:5-9.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1984. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:707-64.
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp, L. A., D. Caulley, and F. Costin. 1979. Student ratings and instructor self-ratings and their relationship to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 16:295-306.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. 1977. Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to student learning. American Educational Research Journal 14:17-24.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. 1993. Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Damron, J. C. 1995. The three faces of teaching evaluation. Unpublished manuscript. New Westminster, British Columbia: Douglas College.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., J. U. Overall, and S. P. Kesler. 1979. Class size, students' evaluations, and instructional effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 16:57-69.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and L. Roche. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The central issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist 52:1187-97.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and L. Roche. 2000. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 202-28.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, D. L. 2000. Student evaluations of teaching and their short term validity. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 54 (4): 77-82.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P., J. Steagall, and M. Fabritius. 1995. Student evaluations of faculty: A new procedure for using aggregate measures of performance. Economics of Education Review 14:403-16.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. 1997. Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist 52:1218-25.
   Google Scholar
• Menefee, R. 1983. Society for College Science Teachers: High technology. Journal of College Science Teaching 13 (2): 70-71.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. 1984. The evaluation of university courses. Studies in Higher Education 9(1): 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, C., and M. G. Borzi. 1989. Methodological issues regarding student evaluations of teachers: A pilot study. ACA Bulletin 70:73-79.
   Google Scholar
• Nevill, D. D., W. B. Ware, and A. B. Smith. 1978. A comparison of student ratings of teaching assistants and faculty members. American Educational Research Journal 15:25-37.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, A. C. 1990. A look at teacher effectiveness research: Theory and practice. NASSP Bulletin 74 (528): 78-88.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, M. 1993. What student evaluations teach. Perspectives on Political Science 22 (1): 29-40.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1991. Performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 16:129-50.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H. 1927. The Purdue Rating Scale for Instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision 6:399-406.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H., and G. C. Brandenburg. 1927. Experimental data on the Purdue ratings scale for instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision 13:519-27.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, L. A., and W. L. Goodwin. 1979. The effects of varying information about use and disposition of results on university students' evaluations of faculty and courses. American Educational Research Journal 16:25-37.
   Google Scholar
• Ediger, M. 1998. Determining success in university teaching. College Student Journal 32:121-24.
   Google Scholar
• Eiszler, C. F. 2002. College students' evaluations of teaching and grade inflation. Research in Higher Education 43 (4): 483-501.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, T. E., D. M, Lane. and P. Dorfman. 1979. Toward the development of a system for instructional evaluation: Is there consensus regarding what constitutes effective teaching? Journal of Educational Psychology 71 (6): 840-49.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1980. The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching. American Educational Research Journal 17:219-37.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1982. Factors affecting students' evaluations of the same course by the same instructor on different occasions. American Educational Research Journal 19:485-97.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1983. Multitrait-multimethod analysis: Distinguishing between items and traits. Educational and Psychological Measurement 43:351-58.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1987. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11:253-388.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1994. Weighting for the right criteria to validate student evaluations of teaching in the IDEA system. Journal of Educational Psychology 86:631-48.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1995. Still weighting for the right criteria to validate student evaluations of teaching in the IDEA system. Journal of Educational Psychology 87:666-79.
   Google Scholar
• Gillmore, G. 1984. Student ratings as a factor in faculty employment decisions and periodic review. Journal of College and University Law 10:557-76.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, L. 1993. On the erosion of education and the eroding foundations of teacher education (or why we should not take student evaluation of faculty seriously). Teacher Education Quarterly 20 (2): 57-64.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. 1989. Association between student ratings of specific instrumental dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 20:583-645.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. 1997. Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice, ed. R. P. Perry and J. C. Smart, 368-95. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossey, R. 1999. Personnel evaluation in higher education: A mounting call for accountability. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13:115-18.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. 2001. Interpreting the numbers: Using narrative to help others read student evaluations of your teaching accurately. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 87:85-100.
   Google Scholar
• Granzin, K. L., and J. J. Painter. 1973. A new explanation for students' course evaluation tendencies. American Educational Research Journal 10:115-24.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A., and G. Gillmore. 1997. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52:1209-17.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, R. E. 1997a. Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluations of faculty: Galloping polls in the 21st century. Education Policy Analysis Archives 5, no. 6 (February 12), (accessed January 31, 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, R. E. 1997b. Academic freedom, promotion, reappointment, tenure, and the administrative use of student evaluation of faculty (SEF): (Part II) Views from court. Education Policy Analysis Archives 5, no. 6 (August 25), (accessed January 31, 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, R. E. 1997c. Academic freedom, promotion, reappointment, tenure, and the administrative use of student evaluation of faculty (SEF): (Part III) Analysis and implications of views from the court in relation to accuracy and psychometric validity. Education Policy Analysis Archives 5, no. 6 (August 25), (January 31, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, R. E. 1997d. Academic freedom, promotion, reappointment, tenure, and the administrative use of student evaluation of faculty (SEF): (Part IV) Analysis and implications of views from the court in relation to academic freedom, standards, and quality of instruction. Education Policy Analysis Archives 5, no. 6 (November 25), (accessed January 31, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Heller, S. 1984. Math department balks at officials' effort to require forms for student evaluation. Chronicle of Higher Education 28 (8): 24.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. 1976. Evaluation of training. In Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development, 2nd ed., ed. R. L. Craig, 18.1-18.27. New York: ASTD-McGraw Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lechtreck, R. 1990. College faculty evaluation by students—An opportunity for bias. College Student Journal 24:297-99.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and M. J. Dunkin. 1992. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J. C. Smart, vol. 8, 143-233. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and D. Hocevar. 1984. The factorial invariance of student evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal 21:341-66.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and J. U. Overall. 1981. The relative influence of course level, course type, and instructor on students' evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal 18:103-12.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H., F. D. Martin, and D. N. Elliot. 1949. Are student ratings of their instructors related to their grades? Purdue University Studies in Higher Education 44:17-26.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., and L. P. Stewart. 2000. Extending the domain of instructional effectiveness assessment in student evaluations of instruction. Communication Education 49:253-66.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, T. 1995. The status and scope of faculty evaluation. ERIC, ED 385315.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, M., and B. Rodin. 1972. Student evaluations of teaching. Science 177:1164-66.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. J., J. A. Anderson, and A. B. Birchler. 1980. Student evaluation: The faculty responds. Research in Higher Education 12 (4): 317-33.
   Google Scholar
• Saroyan, A., and C. Amundsen. 2001. Evaluating university teaching: Time to take stock. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26:341-53.
   Google Scholar
• Shevlin, M., P. Banyard, M. Davies, and M. Griffiths. 2000. The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (4): 397-405.
   Google Scholar
• Shingles, R. D. 1977. Faculty ratings: Procedures for interpreting student evaluations. American Educational Research Journal 14:459-70.
   Google Scholar
• Small, A. C., A. R. Hollenbeck, and R. L. Haley. 1982. The effect of emotional state on student ratings of instructors. Teaching of Psychology 9 (4): 205-08.
   Google Scholar
• Soyjka, J., A. K. Gupta, and D. R. Deeter-Schmelz. 2002. Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: A study of similarities and differences. College Teaching 50 (2): 44-49.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, P. A. 1992. Improving teacher evaluation. ERIC, ED MF01/PC01.
   Google Scholar
• Sproule, R. 2000. Student evaluation of teaching: A methodological critique of evaluation practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives 8 (50), http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n50.html.
   Google Scholar
• Starry, A. R., J. O. Derry, and G. L. Wright. 1973. An automated instructor and course appraisal system. Educational Technology 13 (5): 61-64.
   Google Scholar
• Tagomori, H., and L. A. Bishop. 1995. Student evaluation of teaching: Flaws in the instruments. Thought & Action 1(1): 63-78.
   Google Scholar
• Theall, M., and J. A. Centra. 2001. Assessing the scholarship of teaching: Valid decision from valid evidence. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 86:31-43.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, C. M. 1986. A comparative examination of classroom interactions between professors and minority and non-minority students. American Educational Research Journal 23:6.
   Google Scholar
• Vasta, R., and R. F. Sarmiento. 1979. Liberal grading improves evaluations but not performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 71 (2): 207-11.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C., and T. A. Angelo. 1998. A collective effort classroom assessment technique: Promoting high performance in student teams. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 75:101-12.
   Google Scholar
• Widlak, F. W., E. D. McDaniel, and J. F. Feld-husen. 1973. Factor analysis of an instructor rating scale. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. P., D. A, Delli. and L. Johnson. 1999. Student evaluation of faculty: Effects of purpose on pattern. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13 (2): 179-90.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, U. 1992. Faculty teaching performance evaluation in higher science education: Issues and implications (a "cross-cultural" case study). Science Education 76 (6): 673-84.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J., and M. Theall. 1989. Who reads ratings: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of users of student ratings of instruction. ERIC, ED MF01/PC02.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, H. 1998. Academic contests: Merit pay in Canadian universities. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 53:647-64.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, S. M., and D. M. Talbot. 2001. Understanding student evaluations: What all faculty should know. College Teaching 49:26-31.
   Google Scholar
• Rolph. P., and J. Rolph. 1989. Evaluating courses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 14:117-31.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2000. Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: Rating interpretation guides (RIGs). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 121-34.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T., and E. Hartley. 1972. Some additional factors in student evaluation of courses. American Educational Research Journal 9:241-50.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, R. G. 1978. Variables affecting university student ratings of instructor behavior. American Educational Research Journal 15:287-99.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, J. E., and L. Kremer. 1980. Attitudes toward higher education and course evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (5): 610-17.
   Google Scholar
• Fulda, J. S. 2000. Student evaluations of teaching: Brought to you by computer. British Journal of Educational Technology 31 (1): 81-82.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., S. d'Apollonia, and S. Rosen-field. 1996. The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J. C. Smart, vol. 11, 213-64. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., and D. A. Mizener. 1983. Does the altitude similarity of college professors and their students produce "bias" in course evaluations? American Educational Research Journal 20:123-36.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, R. J., and F. S. Buchtel. 1990. Attributional bias and course evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:341-51.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. K. 1998. Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23:191-211.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P. E. 1991. The TEVAL experience, 1983-88: The impact of a student evaluation of teaching scheme on university teachers. Studies in Higher Education 16 (2): 151-78.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H. 1928. The relationship between students' marks and students' attitudes toward instructors. School and Society 28:759-60.
   Google Scholar
• Cranton, P. A., and R. A. Smith. 1986. A new look at the effect of course characteristics on student ratings of instruction. American Educational Research Journal 23:117-28.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. A. 1982. Validity of student ratings in psychology courses: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Teaching of Psychology 9:78-82.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. A. 1983. Comment on a selective review of the validity of student ratings of teaching. Journal of Higher Education 54:448-58.
   Google Scholar