Peer Observation of Teaching: Perceptions of the Observer and the Observed

References

• Austin, A. E. 1992a. Supporting junior faculty through a teaching fellows program. In New directions for teaching and learning, No. 50: Developing new and junior faculty, ed. M. D. Sorcinelli and A. E. Austin, 73-86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. 1992b. Supporting the professor as teacher: The Lilly Teaching Fellows Program. Review of Higher Education 16:85-106.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, L. 1998. The professional development of teachers in higher education: Structures, methods, and responsibilities. Innovations in Education and Training International 35 (2): 99-107.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. 2002. Peer observation of teaching in Australia. Paper for LTSN Generic Centre, (accessed January 9, 2005). http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record&section=generic&id=28/
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D., and R. Edwards. 2001. We need objective, rigorous peer review of teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education 47 (17): B24.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. J., J. Jonson, and K. Smith. 2000. An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching. In Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future, ed. K. E. Ryan, 73-86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp, L. A., and J. C. Ory. 1994. Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, W. E. 1996. Developing an effective faculty evaluation system. Manhattan: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, R. R. 1996. Formative and summative evaluation in the faculty peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education 20 (4): 235-40.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. 1975. Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction. Journal of Higher Education 46:327-37.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. 1986. Colleague evaluation: The critical link. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. 275722.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. 1993. Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, K. P. 1986. Using assessment to improve instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. 284296.
   Google Scholar
• Dilts, D. A. 1980. A statistical interpretation of student evaluation feedback. Journal of Economic Education 11 (2): 10-15.
   Google Scholar
• Dilts, D. A., L. J. Haber, and D. Bialik. 1994. Assessing what professors do: An introduction to academic performance appraisal in higher education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, R. 1993. The re-examination of faculty priorities. Change 25 (4): 10-25.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, R., P. Hutchings, and K. Quinlan. 1991. The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship of teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• French-Lazovik, G. 1981. Peer review: Documentary evidence in the evaluation of teaching. In Handbook of teacher evaluation, ed. J. Millman, 73-89. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, H. 1999. Observation of teaching. In A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education, ed. H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, and S. Marshall, 226-41. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Glassick, C. E., M. T. Huber, and G. I. Maeroff. 1997. Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. J., B. E. Adam, R. C. Froh, and B. A. Yonai. 1994. Assigning and assessing faculty work. New Directions for Institutional Research 84:79-91.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., and P. Orsmond. 2004. Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education 29:489-503.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, F. R. 1987. Teachers observing teachers. In Teaching at an urban university, ed. J. H. Broderick, 15-24. Boston: Center for the Improvement of Teaching, University of Massachusetts at Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Hogston, R. 1995. Evaluating quality nursing care through peer review and reflection: The findings of a qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 32 (2): 162-72.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. 1996. The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues, and prospects. Innovative Higher Education 20 (4): 221-34.
   Google Scholar
• Keig, L. W., and M. D. Waggoner. 1994. Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no. 2. Eric Document Reproduction Service no. 378925.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, J. 1990. Construct validity of multiple measures in teaching, research, and service and reliability of ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 213-18.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 1995. A multidimensional model for peer evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 6:95-113.
   Google Scholar
• Maehr, M. L., and L. A. Braskamp. 1994. The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magin, D. J. 1998. Rewarding good teaching: A matter of demonstrated proficiency or documented achievement? International Journal of Academic Development 3:124-35.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. F. 1986. Evaluation strategies can be improved with peer observation. School Administrator 43 (1): 14.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G., and J. Double. 1998. Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Training International 35 (2): 161-69.
   Google Scholar
• Mento, A. J., and A. Giampetro-Meyer. 2000. Peer observation of teaching as a true developmental opportunity. College Teaching 48 (1): 28-31.
   Google Scholar
• Millis, B. J. 1987. Colleagues helping colleagues: A peer observation program model. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development 7:15-21.
   Google Scholar
• Morehead, J. W., and P. J. Shedd. 1997. Utilizing summative evaluation through external peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education 22 (1): 37-44.
   Google Scholar
• Ory, J. C. 2000. Teaching evaluation: Past, present, and future. In Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future, ed. K. E. Ryan. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, P. J. 1997. The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perlberg, A. 1983. When professors confront themselves: Towards a theoretical conceptualization of video self-confrontation in higher education. Higher Education 12 (6): 633-63.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D. 2000. Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D., P. Kelly, and M. Caskey. 2002. Ethical considerations for teachers in the evaluation of other teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16:317-24.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Higher Education Research Program. 1989. The business of the business. Policy Perspectives 1:1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Race, P. 2001. The lecturer's toolkit. 2nd ed. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., and S. I. Cheldelin. 1989. The knower and the known: Making the connections. Evaluation of the New Jersey Master Faculty Program. South Orange: New Jersey Institute for Collegiate Teaching and Learning, Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Richlin, L., and B. Manning. 1996. Using portfolios to document teaching excellence. In Honoring exemplary teaching: New directions for teaching and learning, no. 65, ed. M. D. Svinicki and R. J. Menges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, G. 1993. Quality education. Milwaukee: ASOQC Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seldin, P. 1984. Changing practices in faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., C. Hausken, H. Kovacevich, and M. McGuire. 1988. Alternatives for developing teacher effectiveness. Seattle: School of Education, Seattle Pacific University.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. E. 1997. Models for improving college teaching: A faculty resource. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no. 6. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. 403811
   Google Scholar
• Wankat, P. C., and F. S. Oreovicz. 1993. Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Woolwine, D. E. 1988. New Jersey Master Faculty Program research report. South Orange, NJ: New Jersey Institute for Collegiate Teaching and Learning. Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Yon, M., C. Burnap, and G. Kohut. 2002. Evidence of effective teaching: Perceptions of peer reviewers. College Teaching 50 (3): 104-10.
   Google Scholar