Gender Discrimination May Be Worse Than You Think: Testing Ordinal Interactions in Power Research

References

• Bass, B. M. (1981). Stodgill's handbook of leadership (Rev.). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broverman, N. F., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, N. F., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214-229.
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. I. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues 55, 81-99.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D. (Ed.). (1959). Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M. (2004). Means of assessing ordinal interactions in social psychology: The case of sexism in judgments of social power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1857-1877.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., & Loomis, R. J. (2004). The effect of instructor gender and race/ethnicity on gaining compliance in the classroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 937-958.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S. M., & Mace, B. L. (2005). Social power in the classroom: Student attributions for compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35, 1738-1754.
   Google Scholar
• Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Ray, A. G. (2001). School psychologists' perceptions of social power bases in teacher consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 1-23.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., & Lanning, W. (1989). A multivariate analysis of the relationship between social power motivation and personality characteristics in college students. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 522-527.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2005). SPSS for Widows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 12.0 update (5th ed.). Boston: Allynn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. W., & Thomas, K. W. (1974). Power and conflict in the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10, 321-336.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Towards a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99-110.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D. (1984). The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 5, pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001). The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. In A.Y. Lee-Chai and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387-411.
   Google Scholar
• Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 51-88.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227-251.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In A. Y. Lee-Chai and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217-240). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-332.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., & Roach, K. D. (1992). Power in the classroom: Seminal studies. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McRoskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 47-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, K. D. (1991). Graduate teaching assistants' use of behavior alteration techniques in the university classroom. Communication Quarterly, 39, 178-188.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, K. D. (1994). Temporal patterns and effects of perceived instructor compliancegaining use. Communication Education, 43, 236-245.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1938). Power: A new social analysis. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2001). Getting what they came for: How power influences the dynamics and outcomes of interpersonal interaction. In A. Y. Lee-Chai and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 133-155). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Strube, M. J., & Bobko, P. (1989). Testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions: Simulations and further comments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 247-252.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Stimulus book for the Wechsler Memory Scale-III. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar