Heteroscedastic Test Statistics for One-Way Analysis of Variance: The Trimmed Means and Hall's Transformation Conjunction

References

• Bickel, P. J., & Lehmann, E. L. (1975). Descriptive statistics for nonparametric models: II. Location. Annals of Statistics, 3, 1045-1069.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. A., & Govern, D. M. (1994). A new and simpler approximation and ANOVA under variance heterogeneity. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 91-101.
   Google Scholar
• Algina, J., Oshima, T. C., & Lin, W.-Y. (1994). Type I error rates for Welch's test and James's second-order test under nonnormality and inequality of variance when there are two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 275-292.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders [query: Sander in text], J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analysis of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R (2003). Applying contemporary statistical techniques. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J. H., & Luh, W. M. (2000). An invertible transformation two-sample trimmed t statistic under heterogeneity and nonnormality. Statistics and Probability Letters, 49, 1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1992a). The bootstrap and Edgeworth expansion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1992b). On the removal of skewness by transformation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B54, 221-228.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, F. (1991). Some mixed questions and comments on robustness. In W. Stahel & S. Weisberg (Eds.), Directions in robust statistics and diagnostics (Part I, pp. 101-111). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. R. (1992). Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 297-313.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. R., Rubinstein, E. N., Hayes, W. S., & Olds, C. C. (1992). Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research: The one- and two-factor fixed effects ANOVA cases. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 315-339.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, G. W. (1970). Algorithm 395: Student's t distribution. Communications of the ACM, 13, 619-620.
   Google Scholar
• Hoaglin, D. C. (1985). Summarizing shape numerically: The g-and-h distributions. In D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. W. Tukey (Eds.), Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes (461-513). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. (1981). Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiung, T., & Olejnik, S. (1996). Type I error rates and statistical power for the James second-order test and the univariate F test in two-way fixed effects ANOVA models under heteroscedasticity and/or nonnormality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 57-71.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. J. (1978). Modified t tests and confidence intervals for asymmetrical populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 536-544.
   Google Scholar
• Keselman, H. J., Carriere, K. C., & Lix, L. M. (1995). Robust and powerful nonorthogonal analyses. Psychometrika, 60, 395-418.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-H., & Cohen, A. S. (1998). On the Behrens-Fisher problem: A review. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 356-377.
   Google Scholar
• Keselman, H. J., Lix, L. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Psychological Methods, 3, 123-141.
   Google Scholar
• Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, R. R., Taylor, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2000). Tests for mean equality that do not require homogeneity of variances: Do they really work? Communications in Statistic—Simulation and Computation, 29, 875-895.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhoff, J. (1994). Trimmed mean of sample median? Statistics & Probability Letters, 20, 401-409.
   Google Scholar
• Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K. Lowman, L. L., Petoskey, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L. (1993). The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: One theory or two? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1242-1249.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffé, H. (1970). Practical solutions to the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1051-1058.
   Google Scholar
• Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 409-429.
   Google Scholar
• Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579-620.
   Google Scholar
• Luh, W. M. (1999). Developing trimmed mean test statistics for two-way fixed-effects ANOVA models under variance heterogeneity and nonnormality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 243-264.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. Y. (1971). Probabilities of the Type I errors of the Welch tests for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 605-608.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W., & McLaughlin, D. H. (1963). Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample: Trimming/winsorization I. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics: Series A, 25, 331-352.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, J. L., & Gasko, M. (1983). Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean. In D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. Tukey (Eds.), Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis (pp. 297-338). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, P. J., & Penfield, D. A. (1997). Alexander and Govern's approximation: Providing an alternative to ANOVA under variance heterogeneity. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 271-286.
   Google Scholar
• Staudte, R. G., & Sheather, S. J. (1990). Robust estimation and testing. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, S. M. (1977). Do robust estimators work with real data? Annals of Statistics, 5, 1055-1098.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical Statistics and Psychology, 31, 144-152.
   Google Scholar
• Clinch, J. J., & Keselman, H. J. (1982). Parametric alternatives to the analysis of variance. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 207-214.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, P. B., & Woehlke, P. L. (1998). Twenty years of research methods employed in American Educational Research Journal, Educational Researcher, and Review of Educational Research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Luh, W. M., & Guo, J. H. (1999). A powerful transformation trimmed mean method for one-way fixed effects ANOVA model under nonnormality and inequality of variances. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 303-320.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, A. E. (1974). Sample-size determination. Huntington, NY: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, J., & Iglewicz, B. (1984). Some properties of the Tukey g and h family of distributions. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 13, 353-369.
   Google Scholar
• Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, D. P., Wu, E. K. H., & Zhou, J. (1998). On the trimmed mean and minimax-variance L-estimation in Kolmogorov neighbourhoods. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 26, 231-238.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrical Journal, 32, 771-780.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1994a). A one-way random effects model for trimmed means. Psychometrika, 59, 289-306.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1994b). Some results on the Tukey-McLaughlin and Yuen methods for trimmed means when distributions are skewed. Biometrical Journal, 36, 259-273.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65, 51-77.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). ANOVA: The practical importance of heteroscedastic methods, using trimmed means versus means, and designing simulation studies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 99-114.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1995c). Three multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 37, 643-656.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1996). Statistics for the social sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1997). A bootstrap modification of the Alexander-Govern ANOVA method, plus comments on comparing trimmed means. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 655-665.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1998). The goals and strategies of robust methods. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 1-39.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R., Charlin, V., & Thompson, K. L. (1986). New Monte Carlo results on the robustness of the ANOVA F, W, and F* statistics. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 15, 933-944.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R., & Keselman, H. J. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods: Measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods, 8, 254-274.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Can tests for treatment group equality be improved? The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 123-134.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61, 165-170.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS Basic Software, Version 6. Cary, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky, S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352-360.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oshima, T. C., & Algina, J. (1992). Type I error rates for James's second-order test and Wilcox's Hm test under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 255-263.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
   Google Scholar