The Search for "Optimal" Cutoff Properties: Fit Index Criteria in Structural Equation Modeling

References

• Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS, structural equations, program manual: Version 3.0. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375-377.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303-316.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structure analysis and the "problem" of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512-519.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Felsovalyi, A., Sivo, S. A., & Keenan, S. (2002). SAS for Monte Carlo studies: A guide for quantitative researchers. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. (2005) Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999) Effects of sample size, estimation, methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993.) Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indexes for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2005). The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 368-390.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004.) In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, II, 320-341.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Hartmann, W. (1992.) A procedure for obtaining initial values of parameters in the RAM model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 57-176.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990.) Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989.) Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indexes for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (1996.) SAS System (Version 6.12) [computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. S. (1993.) Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2004.) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973.) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Bozdogan, H., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1996.) Inference problems with equivalent models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 279-314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar