292
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Role of Knowledge of Results Frequency in Learning Through Observation

&
Pages 62-70 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • McCullagh, P., & Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of the model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107-116.
  • Park, J., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27-36.
  • Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51-59.
  • Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 10-24.
  • Lee, T. D., & Carnahan, H. (1990). Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor learning: More than just a relative frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 777-789.
  • Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
  • Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (in press). Feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. Williams, N. J. Hodges, M. A. Scott, & M. L. J. Court (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
  • Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. J. (1997). Cognitive processes related to the contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau, and Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106-109.
  • Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
  • Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 348-361.
  • Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., Park, J., & Gaunt, B. (2001). Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127-138.
  • Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 119-125.
  • Vogt, S. (1995). On relations between perceiving, imaging and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 191-216.
  • Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 396-401). London: Wiley.
  • Blandin, Y. (2002). L'Apprentissage par observation d'habiletés motrices: Un processus d'apprentissage spécifique? [Observational learning: A tool for the acquisition of new motor skills?] L'Année Psychologique, 102, 523-554.
  • Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957-979.
  • Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (1997). On the cognitive processes involved in the contextual interference effect. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 32, 211-233.
  • Wulf, G., Shea, J. B., & Rice, M. (1996). Type of KR and KR frequency effects on motor learning. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 30, 1-18.
  • Zelaznik, H. N., & Spring, J. (1976). Feedback in response recognition and production. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 309-312.
  • Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89-98.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Doody, S. G., Bird, A. M., & Ross, D. (1985). The effect of auditory and visual models on acquisition of a timing task. Human Movement Science, 4, 271-281.
  • Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493-501.
  • Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19.
  • Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 1-29.
  • Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2000). On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(A), 846-867.
  • Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18-26.
  • Buekers, M. J., & Magill, R. A. (1995). The role of task experience and prior knowledge for detecting invalid augmented feedback while learning a motor skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 84-97.
  • Deakin, J., & Proteau, L. (2000). The role of scheduling of learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 268-276.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.