Dissociation of Bimanual Responses With the Simon Effect: On the Nonunitization of Bimanual Responses

References

• Berlucchi, G., Aglioti, S., & Tassinari, G. (1994). The role of the corpus callosum and bilaterally distributed motor pathways in the synchronization of bilateral upper-limb responses to lateralized light stimuli. In S. P. Swinnen, H. Heuer, J. Massion, & P. Casaer (Eds.), Interlimb coordination: Neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints (pp. 209-227). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckolz, E., O'Donnell, C., & McAuliffe, J. (1996). The Simon effect: Evidence of a response processing "functional locus." Human Movement Science, 15, 543-564.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, J. M. (1886). The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time. Brain, 9, 512-515.
   Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysical studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A. (1997). Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 684-704.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A. (2004). Attentional distribution of task parameters to the two hands during bimanual performance of right- and lefthanders. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 71-81.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Effects of response readiness and reaction time and force output in people with Parkinson's disease. Brain, 125, 1733-1750.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica, 77, 137-151.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Swinnen, S. P., & Walter, C. (2001). Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 103-112.
   Google Scholar
• Jagacinski, R. J., Marshburn, E., Klapp, S. T., & Jones, M. R. (1988). Tests of parallel versus integrated structure in polyrhythmic tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 416-442.
   Google Scholar
• Kaluzny, P., Palmeri, A., & Wiesendanger, M. (1994). The problem of bimanual coupling: A reaction time study of simple unimanual and bimanual finger responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 93, 450-458.
   Google Scholar
• Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1278-1291.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381-392.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
   Google Scholar
• Marascuilo, L. A. (1971). Statistical methods for behavioral science research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 36, 335-365.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229-238.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1979). Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility. Memory and Cognition, 7, 375-381.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., Nelson, J. M., & Jagacinski, R. J. (1998). Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently? Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 301-322.
   Google Scholar
• Kohfeld, D. L. (1971). Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 251-257.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1997). Effects of response probability on response force and simple RT. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 405-420.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1454-1471.
   Google Scholar
• Mordkoff, J. T., Miller, J., & Roch, A. C. (1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysical measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 25-41.
   Google Scholar
• Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 520-538.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, M. J., & Barber, P. J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
   Google Scholar
• Plat, F. M., Praamstra, P., & Horstink, M. W. I. M. (2000). Redundant-signals effects on reaction time, response force, and movement-related potentials in Parkinson's disease. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 533-539.
   Google Scholar
• Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1485-1497.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Franz, E. A. (2003, March). Bimanual reaction times in patients with unilateral stroke and neurologically-normal controls, Presentation at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1967). Choice reaction time as a function of auditory S-R correspondence, age, and sex. Ergonomics, 10, 659-664.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.
   Google Scholar
• Spijkers, W., & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A(3), 716-740.
   Google Scholar
• Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207-227.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—Good news for bad clocks. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 42, 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Stapf, K. H. (1984). A double response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 545-558.
   Google Scholar
• Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1979). The relationship between reaction time and intensity in discrete auditory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 95-102.
   Google Scholar
• Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S-R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 336-346.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1903). Le mouvement [Movement]. Paris: Doin.
   Google Scholar
• Yamanishi, J., Kawato, M., & Suzuki, R. (1981). Studies on human finger tapping neural networks by phase transition curves. Biological Cybernetics, 33, 199-208.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. O. (2002). Response force in RT tasks: Isolating effects of stimulus probability and response probability. Visual Cognition, 477-501.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
   Google Scholar