Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation

References

• Newell, K. M. (2003). Schema theory: Then and now. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 383-388.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Black, C. B., & Wright D. L. (2000). Can observational practice facilitate error recognition and movement production? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 7(4), 331-339.
   Google Scholar
• Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957-979.
   Google Scholar
• Bruechert, L., Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (2003). Reduced knowledge of results frequency enhances error detection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 467-472.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. J. (2004). Learning a single limb multi-joint coordination pattern: The impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer. Experimental Brain Research, 156, 39-54.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, L. M., & Wiegand, R. L. (1979). Motor schema formation and retention in young children: A test of Schmidt's schema theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 247-251.
   Google Scholar
• Castiello, U., Stelmach, G. E., & Lieberman, A. N. (1993). Temporal dissociation of the prehension pattern in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 31, 395-402.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748-757.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination (pp. 113-150). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. M. (1990). Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 169-177.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. M. (1991). Composition of practice: Influence on the retention of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 187-195.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145-157.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice condition: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., Park, J., & Gaunt, B. (2001). Effects of modeled auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127-138.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Cognitive effort and schema theory: Implications for a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-382.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Turock, D. L. (1990). Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Tests of two invariance properties. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 3-55). Hillsdale; NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1693-1708.
   Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106, 69-95.
   Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64-70.
   Google Scholar
• Wadman, W. J., Denier van der Gon, J. J., Geuze, R. H., & Mol, C. R. (1979). Control of fast goal directed arm movements. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5, 3-7.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre, C., & Shea, C. H. (2000). The performance and learning of generalized motor programs: Relative (GMP) and absolute (parameter) errors. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 163-175.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. B. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 1454-166). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1988). Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. In O. J. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 289-314). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre, C., & Shea, C. H. (2002). The role of parameter variability on retention, parameter transfer, and effector transfer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 47-57.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Proportional and non-proportional transfer of movement sequences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. E. (1990). Generalized motor programs: Reexamining claims of effector independence in writing. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 294-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wright D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32-38.
   Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Ragsdale, M. R. (1979). Further tests of Schmidt's schema theory: Development of a schema rule for coincident timing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 159-166.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G. (1991). The effect of type of practice on motor learning in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 123-134.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G. (1992). Reducing knowledge of results can produce context effects in movements of the same class. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 71-84.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, G. L., & Wright, C. E. (1995). Temporal rescaling of simple and complex ratios in rhythm tapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 602-627.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. R., Larochelle, S., & Grudin, J. T. (1988). Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 524-548.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, H., Ende-Henningsen, B., & Gordon, A. M. (1995). Asymmetric control of bilateral isometric finger forces. Experimental Brain Research, 105, 304-311.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, H. (1988). Testing the invariance of relative timing: Comments on Gentner, 1987. Psychological Review, 97, 402-497.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, H. (1991). Invariant relative timing in motor program theory. In F. Fagard & P. H. Wolff (Eds.), The development of timing control and temporal organization in coordinated action (pp. 37-68). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 241-252.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I. (1995). The organization of action sequences: Evidence from a relearning task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 179-192.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, I. M., & Tsetlin, M. (1971). Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. M. Gelfand, V. Gurfinkel, S. Fomin, & M. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 1-22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. R. (1987). Timing of skilled motor performance: Tests of the proportional duration model. Psychological Review, 94, 255-276.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 77-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., Putnam, C., & Goodman, D. (1983). On the spacetime structure of human inter-limb coordination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A. 347-375.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Zanone, P.-G. (2002). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 776-797.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 395-401.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 21, 1015-1027.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51-59.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 79-83.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). Contrasting perspectives on order and regulation in movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 437-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Relative timing in brain and behavior: Some observations about the generalized motor program and selforganized coordination dynamics. Human Movement Science, 16, 453-460.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Norman, P. E. (1978). Motor schema formation in children. Developmental Psychology, 14, 153-156.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H., Bruechert, L., & Little, M. (2002). Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 299-307.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., & Little, M. (2000). Effects of modeled auditory information on a sequential timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 349-356.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 10-24.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, D. J., & Zelaznik, H. N. (1984). The acquisition of time properties associated with a sequential motor skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 275-301.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Elliott, D., & Carnahan, H. (1987). The preparation of actions and parameters of actions. Acta Psychologica, 66, 83-102.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. (2004). Contextual interference. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 29-44). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problem of flexibility and fluency in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483-506.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 9, 241-289.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. F., & Christina, R. W. (1981). A test of Schmidt's schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52, 474-483.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, H. D., & Stelmach, G. E. (1977). A test of the schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 193-201.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, P. A. (1972). How we control the contraction of our muscles. Scientific American, 226, 30-37.
   Google Scholar
• Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 65-70.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. (1981). Skill learning. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 203-226). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M., & Shapiro, D. C. (1976). Variability of practice and transfer of training: Some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 233-243.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 253-270.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (2003a). The effects of practice on effector transfer. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 33-40.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H. & Shea, C. H. (2003b). The independence of sequence structure and element production in timing sequences. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 401-420.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., & Shea, C. H. (in press). The detection and utilization of sequence information: Influence on response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H, Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Part-whole practice of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 51-60.
   Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive practice. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
   Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Lévesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning—Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 557-575.
   Google Scholar
• Raibert, M. H. (1977). Motor control and learning in a state space model (Tech. Rep. AI-M-351), Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (NTIS No. AD-A026-960).
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. (1988). Investigations on the basis of generalized motor program hypothesis. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 261-288). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1985). The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 188-200.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366-375.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987-1006.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameter learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1550.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomics Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, bad, and ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121-144). London: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (1996). The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 59-68.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., Sidaway, B., & Anderson, D. I. (1994). The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 330-338.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. (March, 1977). Bilateral transfer of a motor program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Benguerel, A. P., & Cowan, H. A. (1974). Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French. Phonetica, 30, 41-55.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
   Google Scholar
• Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62-70.
   Google Scholar