1,035
Views
76
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Observational Modeling Effects for Movement Dynamics and Movement Outcome Measures Across Differing Task Constraints: A Meta-Analysis

, &
Pages 185-205 | Published online: 07 Aug 2010

References

  • Adams, D. L. (1994). The relative effectiveness of three instructional strategies on the learning of an overarm throw for force. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, International Institute for Sport and Human Performance.
  • Al-Abood, S. A. (2001). Effects of visual demonstrations on motor skill acquisition: A visual perception perspective (Exp. 3). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester, UK.
  • Al-Abood, S. A., Bennett, S. J., Hernandez, F. M., Ashford, D., & Davids, K. (2002). Effects of verbal instruction and image size on visual search strategies in basketball free throw shooting. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 271-278.
  • Al-Abood, S. A., Davids, K., & Bennett, S. J. (2001). Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstration and verbal instruction in directing learners' search during skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 295-305.
  • Anderson, D. F., Gebhart, J. A., Pease, D. G., & Ludwig, D. A. (1982). Effect of age, and temporal placement of a model on children's performance on a balance task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 1263-1266.
  • Anderson, D. F., Gebhart, J. A., Pease, D. G., & Rupnow, A. A. (1983). Effects of age, sex, and placement of a model on children's performance on a ball-striking task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1187-1190.
  • Annett, J. (1986). On knowing how to do things. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation in action patterns (pp. 187-200). Berlin: Springer.
  • Armstrong, W. (1971). Effects of videotape feedback on learning specific gross motor skills in tennis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.
  • Ashford, D. G. (1999). Effects of modelling on skill acquisition for the volleyball floating serve in novices. Unpublished master's thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
  • Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 211-269). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavioral modification. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
  • Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257-278.
  • Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2000). On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 846-867.
  • Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18-26.
  • Bradley, W. F. (1975). A comparison of three instructional methods on the improvement of selected badminton skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State University, Mufeesboro.
  • Bunyan, P., & Barton, L. (1993). The role of visual and verbal information when learning an elementary kayak task. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 10, 7-8.
  • Bush, R. L. (1987). The effects of observational learning of selected volleyball skills. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Fullerton.
  • Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • De Maeght, S., & Prinz, W. (2004). Action induction through observation. Psychological Research, 68, 97-114.
  • Drury, F. A. (1959). An evaluation of visual aids in the learning of selected volleyball skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Ames.
  • Dubanoski, R., & Parton, D. A. (1971). Effect of the presence of a human model on imitation behavior in children. Developmental Psychology, 4, 463-468.
  • Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 170-177.
  • Erbaugh, S. J. (1985). Role of visual feedback in observational learning of primary-grade children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 755-762.
  • Feltz, D. L. (1982). The effects of age and number of demonstrations on modeling of form and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 291-296.
  • Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1977). Informational-motivational components of a model's demonstration. Research Quarterly, 48, 525-533.
  • Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis research. Educational Reviewer, 5, 3-8.
  • Gould, D. (1978). The influence of motor task types on model effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 182A (University Microfilms No. 7811242).
  • Gould, D. R., & Roberts, G. C. (1982). Modeling and motor skill acquisition. Quest, 33, 214-230.
  • Gray, C. A., & Brumbach, W. B. (1967). Effect of daylight on film loops on learning badminton. Research Quarterly, 38, 562-569.
  • Gray, J. T., Neisser, U., Shapiro, B. A., & Kouns, S. (1991). Observational learning of ballet sequences: The role of kinematic information. Ecological Psychology, 3, 121-134.
  • Gray, S. W. (1990). Effect of visual-motor rehearsal with videotaped modeling on racquetball performance of beginning players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 379-385.
  • Hall, E. G., & Erffmeyer, E. S. (1983). The effect of visuomotor behavior rehearsal with videotaped modeling of free throw accuracy on intercollegiate female basketball players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 343-346.
  • Halverson, L. E., Robertson, M. A., Safrit, M. J., & Roberts, T. W. (1977). Effects of guided practice on overarm throw velocities of kindergarten children. Research Quarterly, 48, 311-318.
  • Hamerslough, W. S. (1971). The effectiveness of three methods of instruction, followed by mental rehearsal, in learning three complex gross motor tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, College of Human Development and Performance, Eugene.
  • Hebert, E. P., & Landin, D. (1994). Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 250-257.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490-499.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1983). A random effects model for effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 388-395.
  • Hedges, L. V., Cooper, H., & Bushman, B. J. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis in meta-analysis: A comparison of combined probability and confidence interval procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 188-194.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. London: Academic Press.
  • Hopkins, W. (2002). A new view of statistics. http://www.sportsci.org/jour/resresource.html
  • Horn, R. R., Williams, A. M., & Scott, M. A. (2002). Learning from demonstrations: The role of visual search during observational learning from a video and point-light models. Journal of Span Sciences, 20, 253-269.
  • Humphrey, G. (1921). Imitation and the conditioned reflex. Pedagogical Seminary, 10, 116-127.
  • Lafollette, J. (1969). The effect of videotape feedback and demonstration on learning basic archery skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Laguna, P. L. (1996). The effects of model demonstration strategies on motor skill acquisition and performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 30, 55-79.
  • Landers, D. M. (1975). Observational learning of a motor skill: Temporal spacing of demonstrations and audience presence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 281-287.
  • Landers, D. M., & Landers, D. M. (1973). Teacher versus peer models: Effects of model's presence and performance level on motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 129-139.
  • Lirgg, C. D., & Feltz, D. L. (1991). Teacher versus peer models revisited: Effects on motor performance and self-efficacy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 217-234.
  • Magill, R. A. (1993). Motor learning: Concepts and applications. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
  • Magill, R. A., & Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. G. (1996). A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of information for learning a rhythmical gymnastics skill. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 27, 7-22.
  • Martens, R., Burwitz, L., & Zuckerman, J. (1976). Modeling effects on motor performance. Research Quarterly, 47, 277-291.
  • McAuley, A. (1985). Modeling and self-efficacy: A test of Bandura's model. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 283-295.
  • McCullagh, P. (1986). Model status as a determinant of observational learning and performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 319-331.
  • McCullagh, P., & Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107-116.
  • McCullagh, P., & Little, W. S. (1989). A comparison of modalities in modeling. Human Performance, 2, 101-110.
  • McCullagh, P., & Little, W. S. (1990). Demonstrations and knowledge of results in motor skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 735-742.
  • McCullagh, P., Stiehl, J., & Weiss, M. R. (1990). Developmental modeling effects on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of motor performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 344-350.
  • McFarquhar, R. H. (1978). Observational learning and the sequencing of demonstrations. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. (Available at Photographic Services Urbana, IL, as one 35-mm microfilm reel.)
  • McGuire, W. J. (1961). Effects of serial position and proximity to reward within a demonstration film. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 209-216). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Morris, S. B. (2000). Distribution of the standardised mean change effect size for meta-analysis on repeated measures. British Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Psychology, 53, 17-29.
  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.
  • Nelson, D. O. (1958). The effects of slow-motion loop film on the learning of golf. Research Quarterly, 29, 37-45.
  • Newell, K. M. (1985). Coordination, control and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control (pp. 295-317). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Paulat, J. G. (1969). The effect of augmented videotaped information and loop film models upon the learning of a complex motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation. New York: Norton.
  • Pierce, C. G. (1977). Observational learning: Temporal spacing and retention of a model presentation of a gross motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
  • Poulton, E. C. (1957). On prediction in skilled movements. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 467-478.
  • Priebe, R. E., & Burton, W. H. (1939). The slow-motion picture as a coaching device. School Review, 47, 192-198.
  • Roach, N. K., & Burwitz, L. (1986). Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: The effects of verbal directing cues. VIII Commonwealth and International Conference on Sport, Physical Education, Dance, Recreation, and Health (pp. 349-354). Glasgow, Scotland: Spon.
  • Romack, J. L. (1995). Observational learning and acquisition of complex motor patterns by children: A perception/action approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, International Institute for Sport and Human Performance, Eugene.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Roshal, S. M. (1949). Effects of film-mediated perceptual-motor learning with varying representations of the task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State College. (University Microfilms No. 1629.)
  • Roshal, S. M. (1961). Film-mediated learning with varying representation of task: Viewing angle, portrayal of demonstration, motion, and student participation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 155-175). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Ross, D., Bird, A. M., Doody, S. G., & Zoeller, M. (1985). Effects of modeling and video feedback with knowledge of results on motor performance. Human Movement Science, 4, 149-157.
  • Ruffa, E. J. (1937). How motion pictures help the coach. Athletic Journal, 12, 20-23 and 30-31.
  • Schaal, S. (1999). Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robotics? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 233-242.
  • Schaal, S., Ijspeert, A., & Bilard, A. (2003). Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: London-B, 358, 537-547.
  • Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. G. (1992). Investigating the informational nature of a modeled visual demonstration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
  • Scully, D. M. (1986). Visual perception of technical execution and aesthetic quality in biological motion. Human Movement Science, 5, 185-206.
  • Scully, D. M. (1987). Visual perception of biological motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  • Scully, D. M. (1988). Visual perception of human movement: The use of demonstration in teaching motor skills. British Journal of Physical Education Research Supplement, 4, 12-14.
  • Scully, D. M., & Newell, K. M. (1985). Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: Towards a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11, 169-186.
  • Thomas, J. R., & Nelson (1996). Research methods in physical activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Tredway, R. D. (1972). A study comparing the effects of three instructional methods in teaching bowling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia State University, Institution, WV.
  • Wagman, D., & Monroe, D. (1996). Observational learning: Applications to sport. Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 34, 55-74.
  • Weeks, D. L. (1992). A comparison of modeling modularities in the observational learning of an externally paced skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 373-380.
  • Weeks, D. L., & Anderson, L. P. (2000). The interaction of observational learning with overt practice: Effects on motor skill learning. Acta Psychologica, 104, 259-271.
  • Weeks, D. L., Hall, A. K., & Anderson, L. P. (1996). A comparison of imitation strategies in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 348-358.
  • Weir, P. L., & Leavitt, J. L. (1990). The effects of model's skill level and model's knowledge of results on the acquisition of an aiming task. Human Movement Science, 9, 369-383.
  • Weiss, M. R. (1981). The effects of age, modeling, and verbal self-instruction on children's performance of a sequential motor task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
  • Weiss, M. R. (1983a). Developmental modeling enhancing children's motor skill acquisition. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 53, 49-50, 67-68.
  • Weiss, M. R. (1983b). Modeling and motor performance: A developmental perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 190-197.
  • Weiss, M. R. Ebbeck, V, & Rose, D. J. (1992). "Show and tell" in the gymnasium revisited: Developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal effects on motor skill learning and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 292-301.
  • Weiss, M. R., & Klint, K. A. (1987). "Show and tell" in the gymnasium: An investigation of developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 234-241.
  • Weiss, M. R., McCullagh, P., Smith, A. L., & Berlant, A. R. (1998). Observational learning and the fearful child: Influence of peer models on swimming skill performance and psychological responses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 380-394.
  • Whiting, H. T. A., Bijlard, M. J., & den Brinkler, B. P. L. M. (1987). The effects of the availability of a dynamic model on the acquisition of a complex cyclical action. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 43-59.
  • Wiese, D. M. (1989). The effect of model type on cognitive recognition, form kinematics, and outcome during the initial phase of sport skill acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, College of Human Development and Performance, Eugene. (Microfilm publications No. 8918958.)
  • Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport (pp. 238-273). London: Spon.
  • Williams, J. G. (1984). Movement imitation: Some fundamental processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London, England.
  • Williams, J. G. (1989). Throwing action from full-cue and motion-only video-models of an arm movement sequence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 259-266.
  • Williams, J. G., & Thompson, H. (1994). Adaptations in posture and perceived strain in lifting action through video-modeling. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 27, 117-129.
  • We excluded the following studies from the present meta-analysis because they did not meet our criteria for inclusion (see Experiment 1, Method, Eligibility Criteria):
  • Abravanel, E., Levan-Goldschmidt, E., & Stevenson, M. (1976). Action imitation: The early phase of infancy. Child Development, 47, 1032-1044.
  • Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89-98.
  • Al-Abood, S. A., Davids, K., Bennett, S. J., Ashford, D., & Martinez, M. M. (2001). Effects of manipulating relative and absolute motion information during observational learning of an aiming task. Journal of Sport Sciences, 19, 507-520.
  • Alford, G. S., & Rosenthal, T. L. (1973). Process and products of modeling in observational concept attainment. Child Development, 44, 714-720.
  • Aronfreed, J. (1969). The problem of imitation. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 209-317). New York: Academic Press.
  • Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. E., & Sherman, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
  • Baer, D. M., & Sherman, J. A. (1964). Reinforcement control of generalized imitation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1, 37-49.
  • Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 211-269). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1965a). Behavioral modifications through modeling procedures. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullman (Eds.), Research in behavior modification (pp. 310-340). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Bandura, A. (1965b). Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589-595.
  • Bandura, A. (1965c). Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-55). New York: Academic Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Observational learning. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Social foundation of thoughts and action: A social cognitive theory (pp. 47-105). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E. & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 125-139.
  • Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. (1966). Observational learning as a function of symbolization and incentive set. Child Development, 37, 499-506.
  • Bandura, A., & Jeffery, R. W. (1973). Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 122-130.
  • Bandura, A., Jeffery, R. W., & Bachicha, D. L. (1974). Analysis of memory codes and cumulative rehearsal in observational learning. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 295-305.
  • Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 1-9.
  • Bandura, A., & Menlove, F. L. (1968). Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 99-108.
  • Bandura, A., & Mischel, W. (1965). Modification of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 698-705.
  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963a). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3-11.
  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963b). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 601-607.
  • Baron, R. (1970). Attraction toward a model and model's competence as determinants of adult imitative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 345-351.
  • Behets, D. (1993). Systematic observation training of preservice physical education teachers. 87-94.
  • Berger, S. M. (1966). Observer practice and learning during exposure to a model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 696-701.
  • Berger, S. M., Carli, L. L., Hammersla, K. S., Karshmer, J. F., & Sanchez, M. E. (1979). Motoric and symbolic mediation in observational learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 735-746.
  • Berger, S. M., Smith-Irwin, D., & Frommer, G. P. (1970). Electromyographic activity during observational learning. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 86-94.
  • Berlant, A. R. (1995). Modeling, motivational orientation, and motor skill learning: An integrated approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene. (University Microfilms International Ref: UO 95-288.)
  • Berlant, A. R., & Weiss, M. R. (1997). Goal orientation and the modeling process: An individual's focus on form and outcome. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 317-330.
  • Bird, A. M., & Rikli, R. (1983). Observational learning and practice variability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 1-4.
  • Black, C. B., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Can observational practice facilitate error recognition and movement reproduction? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 331-339.
  • Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 265-292.
  • Bond, C. F. J., & Titus, L. J. (1984). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
  • Braun, S. H. (1972). Effects of schedules of direct or vicarious reinforcement and modeling cues on behavior in extinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 356-365.
  • Brewer, K. R., & Wann, D. L. (1998). Observational learning effectiveness as a function of model characteristics: Investigating the importance of social power. Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 1-10.
  • Brody, G., & Stoneman, Z. (1981). Selective imitation of same-age, older, and younger peer models. Child Development, 52, 717-720.
  • Brody, G., & Stoneman, Z. (1985). Peer imitation: An examination of status and competence hypothesis. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 161-170.
  • Broeher, H. (1974). Influence of various combinations of model performances and feedback on the learning of a complex motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • Brown, D. W. (1928). A comparison of whole, part, and combination methods of learning piano music. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 235-247.
  • Brown, H. S., & Messersmith, L. (1948). An experiment in teaching tumbling with and without motion pictures. The Research Quarterly, 19, 304-307.
  • Brown, I., & Inouye, D. K. (1978). Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 900-908.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1973). Organization of early skilled action. Child Development, 44, 1-11.
  • Bryant, S. E., & Fox, S. K. (1995). Behavior modeling training and model's competence as determinants of adult imitation behavior. The Psychological Record, 45, 495-503.
  • Burstein, E., Stotland, E., & Zander, A. (1961). Similarity of a model and self-evaluation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 257-264.
  • Burwitz, L. (1975). Observational learning and motor performance. FEPSAC Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Burwitz, L. (1981). The use of demonstration and videotape recorders in sport and physical education. In I. M. Cockerill & W. W. MacGillivary (Eds.), Vision and sport (182-194). London: Stanley Thornes.
  • Cadopi, M., Chatillon, J. F., & Baldy, R. (1995). Representation and performance: Reproduction of form and quality of movement in dance by eight- and 11-year-old novices. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 217-225.
  • Carnegie, E. M. (1997). The effectiveness of demonstration in conveying kinematic and kinetic information for skill acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ulster, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 153-167.
  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). The role of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 269-281.
  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 385-398.
  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 85-97.
  • Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Tryon, A. S. (1983). Learning through observation: The effects of peer modeling on acquisition and generalization in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 355-366.
  • Coates, B., & Hartup, W. W. (1969). Age and verbalization in observational learning. Developmental Psychology, 1, 556-562.
  • Cooper, L. K., & Rothstein, A. L. (1981). Videotaped replay and the learning of skill in open and closed environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52, 191-199.
  • Corbin, C. B., Laurie, D. R., Gruger, C., & Smiley, B. (1984). Vicarious success experience as a factor influencing self-confidence, attitudes, and physical activity of adult women. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 17-23.
  • Cox, K. M. (1969). An experiment in teaching complex motor skills to university freshmen male students using continuous and discrete concept sequences with and without videotaped replay. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Craig, R. C. (1956). Directed versus independent discovery of established relations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 223-234.
  • Daems, A., & Verfaillie, K. (2000). Viewpoint-dependent priming effects in the perception of human actions and body postures. Visual Cognition, 6, 665-693.
  • Darden, G. F. (1997). Demonstrating motor skills—Rethinking the expert demonstration. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68, 31-35.
  • Davids, K., Bennett, S. J., Handford, C., & Jones, B. (1999). Acquiring co-ordination in self-paced, extrinsic timing tasks: A constraints-led perspective. The International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30, 437-461.
  • Deakin, J. M., & Proteau, L. (1998). The role of scheduling on learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 268-276.
  • Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., et al. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions: Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain, 120, 1763-1777.
  • DeCharms, R., & Rosenbaum, M. E. (1960). Status variables and matching behavior. Journal of Personality, 28, 492-502.
  • Del Ray, P. (1971). The effects of videotaped feedback on form accuracy and latency in an open and closed environment. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 281-287.
  • Del Ray, P. (1972). Feedback provided through videotaped display. The Physical Educator, 29, 118-119.
  • Del Ray, P. (1978). Sex, video-taped feedback and modeling effects on motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 323-331.
  • Doody, S. G., Bird, A. M., & Ross, D. (1985). The effect of auditory and visual models on acquisition of a timing task. Human Movement Science, 4, 271-281.
  • Downey, M. J. (1988). Effects of age, pre-task cues, and task complexity on response acquisition in observational learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Downey, P. J., Neil, G. I., & Rapagna, S. (1996). Evaluating modeling effects in dance. Impulse: The International Journal of Dance Science, Medicine, and Education, 4, 48-64.
  • Dowrick, P. W. (1978). Suggestions for the use of edited video replay in training behavioral skills. Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicap, 2, 21-24.
  • Dowrick, P. W. (1983). Self-modeling. In P. J. W. Dowrick & S. J. Biggs (Eds.), Using video: Psychological and social applications. New York: Wiley.
  • Dowrick, P. W. (1991). Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
  • Dowrick, P. W., & Dove, C. (1980). The use of self-modeling to improve the swimming performance of spina bifida children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 51-56.
  • Eason, B. L. (1972). The effect of videotape instruction on learning a gross motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, TX.
  • Feltz, D. L. (1982). Teaching a high-avoidance motor task to a retarded child through participant modeling. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 152-155.
  • Feltz, D. L., Landers, D. M., & Raeder, U. (1979). Enhancing self-efficacy in high avoidance motor tasks: A comparison of modeling techniques. The Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 112-122.
  • Fisher, M. J. (1995). Observational learning: An assessment of information transfer. Master's thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. (University Microfilms. No. 1346.)
  • Flanders, J. P. (1968). A review of research on imitative behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 316-337.
  • Fouts, G. T., & Liikanen, P. (1975). The effects of age and developmental level on imitation in children. Child Development, 46, 555-558.
  • Fouts, G. T., & Parton, D. A. (1969). Imitation: Effects of movement and static events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 118-126.
  • Fox, P. W., & Levy, C. M. (1969). Acquisition of a simple motor response as influenced by the presence or absence of visual feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1, 169-180.
  • Gallagher, J. D., & Thomas, J. R. (1984). Rehearsal strategy effects on developmental differences for recall of a movement series. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 123-128.
  • Gallagher, J. D., & Thomas, J. R. (1986). Developmental effects of grouping and recoding on learning a movement series. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 117-127.
  • Gelfand, D. M. (1962). The influence of self-esteem on rate of verbal conditioning and social matching behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 259-265.
  • Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.
  • George, T. R., Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A. (1992). Effects of model similarity on self-efficacy and muscular endurance: A second look. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 237-248.
  • Gerst, M. (1971). Symbolic coding processes in observational learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 9-17.
  • Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
  • Gould, D., & Weiss, M. (1981). The effects of model similarity and model talk on self-efficacy and muscular endurance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 17-29.
  • Gould, D. R., & Roberts, G. C. (1982). Modeling and motor skill acquisition. Quest, 33, 214-230.
  • Greenwald, A. G., & Albert, S. M. (1968). Observational learning: A technique for elucidating S-R mediation processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 267-272.
  • Grusec, J. E., & Brinker, D. B. (1972). Reinforcement for imitation as a social learning determinant with implications for sex-role development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 149-158.
  • Grusec, J. E., & Michel, W. (1966). Model's characteristics as determinants of social learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 211-215.
  • Hall, C., Moore, J., Annett, J., & Rodgers, W. (1997). Recalling demonstrated and guided movements using imagery and verbal rehearsal strategies. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 136-144.
  • Hartman, M. D. (1989). The effects of an observational training program on feedback behaviors of pre-service educators in a clinical adapted physical education setting. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
  • Hartup, W. W., & Coates, B. (1967). Imitation of a peer as a function of reinforcement from the peer group and rewardingness of the model. Child Development, 38, 1003-1016.
  • Hicks, D. J. (1965). Imitation and retention of film-mediated aggressive peer and adult models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 97-100.
  • Hoff, D. J. (1969). A comparison between videotape and conventional method of instruction in bowling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
  • Humphrey, G. (1921). Imitation and the conditioned reflex. Pedagogical Seminary, 28, 1-21.
  • Ishikura, T., & Inomata, K. (1995). Effects of angle of model demonstration on learning of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 651-658.
  • Ishikura, T., & Inomata, K. (1998). An attempt to distinguish between two reversal processing strategies for learning modeled motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86(3, Pt. 1), 1007-1015.
  • James, R., & Dufek, J. S. (1993). Movement observation: What to watch … and why. Strategies, 7, 17-19.
  • Jeffery, R. W. (1976). The influence of symbolic and motor rehearsal in observational learning. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 116-127.
  • Kanfer, F. H., & Duerfeldt, P. H. (1967). Learners' competence, model competence, and number of observational trials in vicarious learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 153-157.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1974a). Comparative effects of some variations in covert modeling. Journal of Behavior, Therapy, and Experimental Psychology, 5, 225-232.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1974b). Covert modeling, model similarity, and the reduction of avoidance behavior. Behavioral Therapy, 5, 325-340.
  • Kelly, S., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation. Psychological Research, 65, 15-23.
  • Kimble, G. A., & Wulff, J. J. (1961a). The effectiveness of instruction in reading a scale as influenced by the relative amounts of demonstration and problem-solving practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 227-239). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Kimble, G. A., & Wulff, J. J. (1961b). "Response guidance" as a factor in the value of student participation in film instruction. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 217-226). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Knapp, C. G., Dixon, W. R., & Lazier, M. (1958). Learning to juggle: Ill. A study of performance by two different age groups. The Research Quarterly, 29, 32-36.
  • Kolonay, B. J. (1977). The effects of visuo-motor behavioral rehearsal on athletic performance. Unpublished master's thesis, Hunter College, New York.
  • Kowalski, E. M. (1990). Modeling and motor sequencing strategies of learning disabled boys. Doctoral dissertation, Micro form Publications, College of Human Development and Performance, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • Kowalski, E. M., & Sherrill, C. (1992). Motor sequencing of boys with learning disabilities: Modeling and verbal rehearsal strategies. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 261-272.
  • Kuhn, D. (1973). Imitation theory from a cognitive perspective. Human Development, 16, 157-180.
  • Landers, D. M. (1978). How, when, and where to use demonstrations: Suggestions for the practitioner. Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 49, 65-67.
  • Laugier, C., & Cadopi, M. (1996). Representational guidance of dance performance in adult novices: Effect of concrete vs. abstract movement. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 27, 91-108.
  • Lee, T., & White, M. A. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model's practice schedule on observational learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 349-367.
  • Lee, T. D., Wishart, L. R., Cunninghan, S., & Carnahan, H. (1997). Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 100-105.
  • Leifer, A. D., Collins, W. A., Gross, B. M., Taylor, P., Andrews, L., & Blackmer, E. (1971). Developmental aspects of variables relevant to observational learning. Child Development, 42, 1509-1516.
  • Little, W. S., & McCullagh, P. (1989). Motivation orientation and modeled instruction strategies: The effects on form and accuracy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 41-53.
  • Lockhart, J. A. (1944). The value of the motion picture as an instructional device in learning a motor skill. Research Quarterly, 15, 181-187.
  • Maccoby, E. E., & Wilson, W. C. (1957). Identification and observational learning from films. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 76-87.
  • Maccoby, N., & Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Combining practice with demonstration in teaching complex sequences: Summary and interpretation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 77-86). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Magill, R. A. (1993). Modeling and verbal feedback influences on skill learning. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 24, 358-369.
  • Majeres, R. L., & Timmer, T. (1981). Imitation preference as a function of motor competence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 175-180.
  • Margolius, G. J., & Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Optimum methods of combining filmed demonstrations with practice in teaching complex sequences: Serial learning of a mechanical assembly task. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 33-53). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Margolius, G. J., Sheffield, F. D., & Maccoby, N. (1961a). Repetitive versus consecutive demonstration and practice in the learning of a serial mechanical-assembly task. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 87-100). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Margolius, G. J., Sheffield, F. D., & Maccoby, N. (1961b). Timing of demonstration and overt practice as a function of task organization. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 101-105). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Mataric, M. J., & Pomplun, M. (1998). Fixation behavior in observation and imitation of human movement. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 191-202.
  • May, M. A. (1946). The psychology of learning from demonstration films. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 1-12.
  • McCullagh, P. (1987). Model similarity effects on motor performance. The Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 249-260.
  • McCullagh, P. (1993). Modeling, learning, developmental and social psychological considerations. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 106-126). New York: MacMillan.
  • McCullagh, P., & Little, W. S. (1989). A comparison of modalities in modeling. Human Performance, 2, 101-110.
  • McCullagh, P., & Meyer, K. N. (1997). Learning versus correct models: Influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 56-61.
  • McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R., & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 17, 476-513.
  • McCullagh, P. D. (1976). Model status and attention: A partial test of social learning theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • McDavids, J. W. (1964). Effects of ambiguity of imitative cues upon learning by observation. Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 165-174.
  • McGuire, W. J. (1961a). Effects of serial position and proximity to reward within a demonstration film. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 209-216). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • McGuire, W. J. (1961b). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of demonstrational films: Repetition of instructions, slow motion, distribution of showings, and explanatory narration. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 187-207). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • McKenzie, T. L, Clark, E. K., & McKenzie, R. (1984). Instructional strategies: Influence on teacher and student behavior. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 3, 20-28.
  • McLaughlin, L. J., & Brinley, J. F. (1973). Age and observational learning of a multiple-classification task. Developmental Psychology, 9, 9-15.
  • Mead, B. J. M. (1973). Observational learning of throwing by young boys under conditions of actual and symbolic presentations of a model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 33, 9-10, 4919-A. (University Microfilms No. 73-6066.)
  • Meaney, K. S. (1994). Developing modeling effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a novel task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 1031-1039.
  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 74-78.
  • Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Newell, K. M., Morris, L. R., & Scully, D. M. (1985). Augmented information and the acquisition of skill in physical activity. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 13, 235-261.
  • Noel, R. C. (1980). The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal on tennis performance. Journal of Sports Psychology, 2, 221-226.
  • Ochs, K. (1970). The effect of videotape replay as an instructional aid to beginning bowling classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.
  • O'Connell, E. J., Jr. (1965). The effect of co-operative and competitive set on the learning of imitation and vicarious reinforcement. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1, 172-183.
  • Parton, D. (1976). Learning to imitate during infancy. Child Development, 47, 14-31.
  • Patrick, K., & Richman, C. L. (1986). Imitation in toddlers as a function of motor and verbal aspects of modeling. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 507-518.
  • Paulus, P. B., Gatchel, R. J., & Seta, J. J. (1978). Enhancement and reduction of task performance by psychological modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 126-130.
  • Pellett, T. L. (1992). Visual pretraining effects on coincident timing skill acquisition and retention. Unpublished master's thesis, College of Human Development and Performance, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • Penman, K. A., Bartz, D., & Davis, R. (1968). Relative effectiveness of an instant replay videotape recorder in teaching trampoline. Research Quarterly, 39, 1060-1062.
  • Perry, D. G., & Perry, L. C. (1974). Observational learning in children: Effects of sex of model and subject's sex role behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1083-1088.
  • Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation. New York: Norton.
  • Pollock, B. J., & Lee, T. D. (1992). Effects of the model's skill level on observational motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 25-29.
  • Putman, M. L. (1989). The effectiveness of two observational learning programs on increasing the ability of pre-service physical education teachers to observe desist episodes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Reid, V. G. S. (1987). Learning methods and their effectiveness on the performance level of administering motor assessment tests. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Long Beach.
  • Rikli, R., & Smith, G. (1980). Videotape feedback effects on tennis serving form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 895-901.
  • Roberts, M. C., Santogrossi, D. A., & Thelen, M. H. (1976). The effects of prior experience in the modeling situation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 524-531.
  • Rosekrans, M. A. (1967). Imitation in children as a function of perceived similarity to a social model and vicarious reinforcement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 307-315.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 153-182). New York: Academic Press.
  • Rosenbaum, M. E. (1967). The effect of verbalization of correct responses by performers and observers on retention. Child Development, 38, 615-622.
  • Rosenbaum, M. E., Chalmers, D. K., & Horne, W. C. (1962). Effects of success and failure and the competence of the model on the acquisition and reversal of matching behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 54, 251-258.
  • Rosenbaum, M. E., & Tucker, I. F. (1962). Competence of the model and the learning of imitation and non-imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 183-190.
  • Rosenblith, J. F. (1959). Learning by imitation in kindergarten children. Child Development, 30, 69-80.
  • Roshal, S. M. (1961). Film-mediated learning with varying representation of the task: Viewing angle, portrayal of demonstration, motion, and student participation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 155-175). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council
  • Rosser, R. A., & Brody, G. H. (1981). Acquisition of a concrete operational rule observational learning: How abstract is the acquired abstraction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 27, 3-13.
  • Rothstein, A. L., & Arnold, R. K. (1976). Bridging the gap: Application of research on videotape feedback and bowling. Motor Skills Theory and Practice, 1, 35-62.
  • Ruffa, E. J. (1937). How motion pictures help the coach. Athletic Journal, 12, 20-23; 30-31.
  • Rumiati, R. I., & Tessari, A. (2002). Imitation of novel and well-known actions. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 425-433.
  • Rushall, B. S. (1988). Covert modeling as a procedure for altering an elite athlete's psychological state. The Sport Psychologist, 2, 131-140.
  • Schmidt, R., Zuckerman, J., Martin, H. A., & Wolfe, K. F., Jr. (1971). A novel discrete gross motor learning task: Modification of the Bachman ladder. Research Quarterly, 42, 78-82.
  • Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. G., Magill, B. G., & Sidaway, B. (1993). The acquisition of co-ordination from modeled information during different stages of learning. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(Suppl. S1-S96), S69.
  • Scully, D., & Carnegie, E. (1998). Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstrations. Irish Journal of Psychology, 19, 472-485.
  • Scully, D. M. (1986). Visual perception of technical execution and aesthetic quality in biological motion. Human Movement Science, 5, 185-206.
  • Scully, D. M. (1987). Visual perception of biological motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  • Scully, D. M. (1988). Visual perception of human movement: The use of demonstration in teaching motor skills. British Journal of Physical Education Research Supplement, 4, 12-14.
  • Scully, D. M., & Newell. K. M. (1985). Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: Toward a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11, 169-186.
  • Shea, C., Wright, D., & Whitacre, C. (1993). Actual and observational practice: Unique perspectives on learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(Suppl. A79).
  • Shea, C., Wright, D., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27-36.
  • Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Theoretical considerations in the learning of complex sequential task from demonstration and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 13-32). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Sheffield, F. D., & Maccoby, N. (1961). Summary and interpretations of research on organisational principles in constructing filmed demonstrations. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 117-134). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Sheffield, F. D., Margolius, G. J., & Hoehn, A. J. (1961). Experiments on perceptual mediation in the learning of organizable sequences. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 107-116). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Sheriff, T., & Hedberg, A. (1974). Retention of observational learning as a function of verbal coding and overt practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 179-182.
  • Sidaway, B., & Hand, M. J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 122-126.
  • Singer, R. N., & Pease, D. (1976). A comparison of discovery learning and guided instructional strategies on motor skill learning, retention, and transfer. Research Quarterly, 47, 788-796.
  • Smith, L. E., & Harrison, J. S. (1962). Comparison of the effects of visual, motor, mental and guided practice upon speed and accuracy of performance of a simple eye-hand co-ordination task. Research Quarterly, 33, 299-307.
  • Southard, D., & Higgins, T. (1987). Changing movement patterns: Effects of demonstration and practice. Research Quarterly, 58, 77-80.
  • Taffee, J. (1977). Observational learning and symbolic coding of a sequential motor task by educatable mentally handicapped children. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  • Thomas, J. R., Pierce, C., & Ridsdale, S. (1977). Age differences in children's ability to model motor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 48, 592-598.
  • Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (1998). Social learning theory: An empirically-based approach to understanding human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1, 33-52.
  • Turpin, J. M. (1977). The effect of verbal training without model, verbal modeling and verbal training with model on the acquisition and retention of a six-task motor sequence by educable mentally retarded children. Unpublished master's thesis, The Pennsylvania Sate University, University Park.
  • Twitmyer, E. M. (1931). Visual guidance in motor learning. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 165-187.
  • Vereijken, B. (1991). Modeling in the learning of complex, cyclical movements. In R. Daugs et al. (Eds.), Sportmotorisches Lernen und Techniktraining, Band 2: Internationales Symposium, Motorik- und Bewegungsforschung" 1989 in Saarbrucken, Berlin: Verlag Karl Hofmann Schorndorf.
  • Vereijken, B., & Whiting, H. T. A. (1990). In defence of discovery learning. Canadian Journal of Sports Science, 15, 99-106.
  • Vogt, S. (1995). On relations between perceiving, imaging and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 191-216.
  • Wagman, D., & Monroe, D. (1996). Observational learning: Applications to sport. Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 34, 55-74.
  • Wapner, S., & Cerillo, L. (1968). Imitation of a model's hand movements; age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Development, 39, 887-894.
  • Weeks, D. L., & Choi, J. (1992). Modelling the perceptual component of a coincident-timing skill: The influence of frequency of demonstration. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 23, 201-213.
  • Weinberg, R. S., Seabourne, T. G., & Jackson, A. (1982). Effects of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal on state-trait anxiety and performance: Is practice important? Journal of Sport Behavior, 5, 209-219.
  • Weinberg, R. S., Sinardi, M., & Jackson, A. (1983). Effect of modeling and bar height on anxiety, self-confidence and gymnastic performance. International Gymnast (Tech. Suppl.), TS11-TS13.
  • Weiss, M. R. (1982). Developmental modeling: Enhancing children's motor skill acquisition. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Dance, 53, 49-50, 67.
  • Weiss, M. R., Ebbeck, V., & Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M. (1993). Developmental and psychological factors related to children's observational learning of physical skills. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 301-317.
  • Weiss, W., Maccoby, N., & Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Combining practice with demonstration in teaching complex sequences: Serial learning of a geometric-construction task. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student responses in programmed instruction (pp. 55-76). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
  • Whiting, H. T. A. (1988). Imitation and the learning of complex cyclical actions. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 381-401). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M. (1993). Giving and evaluating demonstrations. Strategies, May, 13-15.
  • Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M., & Weiss, M. R. (1992). Modeling effects on children's form kinematics, performance outcome, and cognitive recognition of a sport skill: An integrated perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 67-75.
  • Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: Spon.
  • Williams, J. (1986). Perceiving human movement: A review of research with implications for the use of the demonstration during motor learning. Physical Education Review, 9, 53-58.
  • Williams, J. G. (1984). Movement imitation: Some fundamental processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, Institute of Education.
  • Williams, J. G. (1987a). Visual demonstration and movement production: Effects of motoric mediation during observation of a model. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 825-826.
  • Williams, J. G. (1987b). Visual demonstration and movement sequencing: Effects of instructional control of the eyes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 366.
  • Williams, J. G. (1988). Perception of a throwing action from point-light demonstrations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 273-274.
  • Williams, J. G. (1989a). Visual demonstration and movement production: Effects of timing variations of a model's action. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 891-896.
  • Williams, J. G. (1989b). Effects of kinematically enhanced video-modeling on improvement of form in a gymnastic skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 473-474.
  • Williams, J. G. (1989c). Motor skill instruction, visual demonstration and eye movement. Physical Education Review, 12, 49-55.
  • Williams, J. G. (1993). Motoric modeling: Theory and research. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 24, 237-279.
  • Williams, M. L., & Willoughby, R. H. (1971). Observational learning: The effects of age, task difficulty, and observer's motoric rehearsal. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12, 146-156.
  • Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. (1997). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau, and Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106-109.
  • Wuyts, I. J., & Buekers, M. J. (1995). The effects of visual and auditory models on the learning of a rhythmical synchronisation dance skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 105-115.
  • Yando, R., Seitz, V., & Zigler, E. (1978). Imitation: A developmental perspective. New York: Wiley.
  • Yussen, S. R. (1974). Determinants of visual attention and recall in observational learning by pre-schoolers and second graders. Developmental Psychology, 10, 93-100.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Rosenthal, T. L. (1974). Observational learning of rule governed behavior in children. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 29-42.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.