Numerosity and Rhythmicity in Stimulus-Response Compatibility

References

• Angel, A. (1973). Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 193-200.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelson, P., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1992). The time course of Braille word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 284-297.
   Google Scholar
• Chochon, F., Cohen, L., Van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 617-630.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219-250.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neuro- sciences, 21, 355-361.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, D. (1992). Wynn on mathematical empiricism. Mind & Language, 7, 333-358.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1987). The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 66, 237-250.
   Google Scholar
• Kanizsa, G. (1994). Gestalt theory has been misinterpreted, but has also had some real conceptual difficulties. Philosophical Psychology, 7, 149-162.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Pokorny, R. A., Corcos, D. M., & Ivry, R. (1985). Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms? A correlational analysis. Acta Psychologica, 60, 173-191.
   Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A., & Brewster, J. M. (1985). Rhythms and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 150-167.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, L. E. (1982). Single judgments of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 175-182.
   Google Scholar
• Kwantes, P. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1999). Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 376-381.
   Google Scholar
• Lassaline, M. E., & Logan, G. D. (1993). Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 561-581.
   Google Scholar
• Macdougall, R. (1902). The relation of auditory rhythm to nervous discharge. Psychological Review, 9, 460-480.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O. (2006). Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 387-396.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O., Atkins, S. G., & Van Nes, F. (2005). Compatibility effects based on stimulus and response numerosity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 265-270.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfeld, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
   Google Scholar
• Penhune, V. B., Zatorre, R. J., & Evans, A. C. (1998). Cerebellar contributions to motor timing: A PET study of auditory and visual rhythm reproduction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 752-766.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Van Zandt, T. (1994). Human factors in simple and complex systems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Radeau, M., Mousty, P., & Bertelson, P. (1989). The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition. Psychological Research, 51, 123-128.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, T. C., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (1994). On the cognitive structure of basic arithmetic skills: Operation, order, and symbol transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1139-1153.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372-393.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. (1970). Some variables affecting the relation between relative stimulus frequency and choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 33, 45-55.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, H. G., & McConkie, A. (1973). S-R compatibility, response discriminability, and response codes in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 375-378.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). Latency/duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
   Google Scholar
• Viviani, P. (1979). Choice reaction time for temporal numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 157-167.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
   Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. (1980). Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (73-128). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, P. H., Hurwitz, I., & Moss, H. (1977). Serial organization of motor skills in left- and right-handed adults. Neuropsychologia, 15, 539-546.
   Google Scholar
• Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (1990). On the relation between production and verification tasks in the psychology of simple arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 83-97.
   Google Scholar