Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation: An Expectancy Perspective

References

• Ferris, K. R. (1977). A test of the expectancy theory as motivation in an accounting environment. Accounting Review, 52(3), 605-614.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S., Randolph, W. A., & Blencoe, A. G. (1982). Level and source of feedback as determinants of feedback effectiveness. Proceedings of the Academy of Management 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 175-179), New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. L., Beard, J. D., & Rymer, J. (1991). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13(2), 45-53.
   Google Scholar
• Snead, K. C., & Harrell, A. M. (1995). An application of expectancy theory to explain a manager's intention to use a decision support system. Decision Sciences, 25(4), 499-513.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, M. J., & Harrell, A. M. (1981). Modeling effort decisions with behavioral decision theory: Toward an individual differences model of expectancy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(3), 303-325.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. C. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. R., Haas, R. W., & Sciglimpaglia, D. (1996). Using peer evaluations to assess individual performances in group class projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 18(2), 17-27.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, P., & McInnes, M. (1986). Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. Accounting Review, 61(4), 587-600.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, F. G., Chen, Y., Grover, V., & Stewart, K. A. (1992). An application of expectancy theory for assessing user motivation to utilize an expert system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3), 183-198.
   Google Scholar
• Cederblom, D., & Lounsbury, J. W. (1980). An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 33(3), 567-579.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorpade, J., & Lackritz, J. R. (2001). Peer evaluation in the classroom: A check for sex and race/ethnicity effects. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 274-281.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, J., & Raeside, R. (1990). Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), 210-231.
   Google Scholar
• Murky, D., & Frizzier, K. B. (1986). A within-subjects test of expectancy theory in a public accounting environment. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2), 400-404.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrard, W. R., & Raafat, F. (1994). An empirical study of peer bias in evaluations: Students rating students. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 43-47.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. A. (1998). Grading cooperative projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74(2), 59-67.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Cooper, E. A. (1996). Using expectancy theory to assess student motivation. Issues in Accounting Education, 11(1), 113-129.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, R. S. (1996). Performance rating. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, A. M., Caldwell, C., & Doty, E. (1985). Within-person expectancy theory predictions of accounting students' motivation to achieve academic success. Accounting Review, 60(4), 724-735.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. B., & Smith, F. I. (1997). Assessment of a complex peer evaluation instrument for team learning and group processes. Accounting Education, 2(1), 21-40.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. F. (1990). Perceived similarity and accuracy of peer ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 213-218.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, D., & Cadiz, D. (1998). Evaluating team work on student projects: The use of behaviorally anchored scales to evaluate student performance. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 424250.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1984). Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morahan-Martin, J. (1996). Should peers' evaluations be used in class projects? Questions regarding reliability, leniency, and acceptance. Psychological Reports, 78(3), 1243-1250.
   Google Scholar
• Gueldenzoph, L. E., & May, G. L. (2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 9-20.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. L., Hass, R. W., & Wotruba, T. R. (1998). The use of self-ratings and peer ratings to evaluate performances of student group members. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(3), 200-209.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, D. R. (1995). What teachers may do to influence student motivation: An application of expectancy theory. The Journal of General Education, 44(3), 171-179.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G. (1983). Expectancy theory as explanation of voluntary use of a decision support system. Psychological Reports, 52(1), 247-260.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. W. (1981). An investigation of student peer evaluation on group project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 3(1), 50-52.
   Google Scholar