Environmental Concerns and the New Environmental Paradigm in Bulgaria

References

• Albrecht, D., Bultena, G., Holberg, E., & Nowak, P. (1982). The new environmental paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 13(3), 39-43.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2002). Environmental perception: Factor profile of extreme groups. European Psychologist, 7, 225-237.
   Google Scholar
• Botcheva, L. (1996). Focus and effectiveness of environmental activism in Eastern Europe: A comparative study of environmental movements in Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia, and Romania. The Journal of Environment and Development, 5, 292-308.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (1999). Values or views of government? Analyzing the ideological sources of public policy preferences. Social Science Research, 28, 137-161.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In A. K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S.-S., & Poon, C.-S. (2000). A comparison of waste reduction practices and the new environmental paradigm in four southern Chinese areas. Environmental Management, 26, 195-206.
   Google Scholar
• Cordano, M., Welcomer, S. A., & Scherer, R. F. (2003). An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 22-28.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D., & Clark, J. R. (1993). Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 289-304.
   Google Scholar
• Drori, I., & Yutchmann-Yaar, E. (2002). Environmental vulnerability in public perceptions and attitudes: The case of Israel's urban centers. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 53-63.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment, 35(9), 7-39.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Scarce, R. (1991). The polls-poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651-672.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. W., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff B., Nair, I., & Lave, L.B. (1991). What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 11, 303-314.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country results from an Istanbul survey. Environment and Behavior, 30, 520-534.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, J. M., & Lasley, P. (1985). The new environmental paradigm scale: A reexamination. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(1), 9-12.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch, G.D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior, 27, 513-539.
   Google Scholar
• Klarer, J., & Moldan, B. (1997). The environmental challenge for central European economies in transition. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics, 32(1), 93-107.
   Google Scholar
• Lalonde, R., & Jackson, E.L. (2002). The new environmental paradigm scale: Has it outlived its usefulness? The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(4), 28-36.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-033). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
   Google Scholar
• Mariana, N. (1998). Technological hazards in Bulgaria. In K. Paskleva, P. Shapira, J. Pickles, & B. Koulov (Eds.), Bulgaria in transition: Environmental consequences of political and economic transition, Chapter 3 (pp. 39-56). Brookefield, VT: Ashgate Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, F. P., & Snow, R. (1990). The new environmental paradigm and further scale analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(4), 20-26.
   Google Scholar
• Nooney, J. G., Woodrum, E., Hoban, T. J., & Clifford, W. B. (2003). Environmental worldview and behavior.Environment and Behavior, 35, 763-783.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Fisher, A., Staneva, M., Kozhouharova-Zhivkova, V., & Dobreva, S. (1999). Determinants of support for climate change policies in Bulgaria and the USA. Risk Decision and Policy, 4, 255-269.
   Google Scholar
• O'Riordan, T. (1995). Frameworks for choice: Core beliefs and the environment. Environment, 37(8), 4-9, 25-29.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J., & Michkova, D. (1993). Environmental data and social change in Bulgaria: Problems and prospects of data availability for future research (Research Rep. No. 9308). Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. C., Lovrich, N. P., Jr., Tsurutani, T., & Abe, T. (1987). Culture, politics, and mass publics: Traditional and modern supporters of the new environmental paradigm scale in Japan and the United States. The Journal of Politics, 49(1), 54-79.
   Google Scholar
• Rauwald, K. S., & Moore, C.F. (2002). Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries. Environment and Behavior, 34, 709-739.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, B. E., Hushen, K., McGinty, D., Perkins, S., & Tate, J. (2005). Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm in systematic and e-mail samples of college students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(2), 15-23.
   Google Scholar
• Schuett, M. A., & Ostergren, D. (2003). Environmental concern and involvement of individuals in selected voluntary associations. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(4), 30-38.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, W. P., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior: A five country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26, 239-260.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L., Kolarova, D., & Rucai, A. (1998). Risk perceptions in Bulgaria and Romania. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-cultural risk perception research (pp. 145-184). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M. A. E., & Witt, S. L. (1989). Gender differences in environmental orientations: A comparison of publics and activists in Canada and the US. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 627-649.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M. A., & Cordell, K. H. (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior, 29, 618-637.
   Google Scholar
• Widegren, O. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 75-100.
   Google Scholar