Grade Retention: Is It a Help or Hindrance to Student Academic Success?

References

• Shinn, M. R. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, M. (1993). The path to dropping out: Evidence for intervention. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, J. (1991). Rethinking grade retention. The Education Digest, 56, 30--33.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1997). Thinking about standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 184--189.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., McGill-Franzen, A. M., & Schick, R. (1997). How administrators understand learning difficulties: A qualitative analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 18(3), 223-232.
   Google Scholar
• American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (1997). Passing on failure: District promotion policies and practices. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. E., Whipple, A. D., & Jimerson, S. R. (2002). Grade retention: Achievement and mental health outcomes. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from
   Google Scholar
• Balow, I., & Schwager, M. (1990). Retention in grade: A failed procedure. Report presented to the California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California, Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, S., Krentz, J., & Thurlow, M. (2002). Are we there yet? Accountability for the performance of students with disabilities (Tech. Rep. No. 33). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, M. (1995, December). Grade retention and school dropout: Policy debate and research questions. Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research. PDK International---Research Bulletin No. 15. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, W. (1995). School dropouts: New information for an old problem. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386515)
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Dauber, S. (1994). On the success of failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. (1998, June). A primer on student grade retention: What the research says. NASP Communique, 28, 8.
   Google Scholar
• McMillen, M., Kaufman, P., & Klein, S. (1997). Dropout rates in the United States: 1997. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410370)
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L., & Smith, M. (1990). Synthesis of research on grade retention. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 84--88.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, B., Mead, R., & Payne, D. (2002). A report of a standard setting method for alternate assessments for students with significant disabilities (Synthesis Report 47). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from
   Google Scholar
• Overman, M. (1986). Student promotion and retention. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 609--613.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, R. S., Weitzman, M., & Auinger, P. (1997). Increased behavior problems associated with delayed school entry and delayed school progress. Pediatrics, 100, 654--661.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S., Sinclair, M., Thurlow, M., & Evelo, D. (1995). Tip the balance: Practices and policies that influence school engagement for youth at high risk for dropping out. ABC dropout prevention and intervention series. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED398673)
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Alternatives to grade retention. The School Administrator, 55(7), 8--21.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (1997). Using standards and assessments to support student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 190--199.
   Google Scholar
• DeBettencort, L. U., & Zigmond, N. (1990). The learning disabled secondary student dropout: What teachers should know. What teachers can do. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13(1), 17--20.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. T. (1989). Grade level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16--33). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isenhart, L., & Bechard, S. (1987). Dropout prevention. The ECS survey of state initiatives for youth at risk. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED305205)
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420--437.
   Google Scholar
• Light, H., & Morrison, P. (1990). Beyond retention: A survival guide for regular classroom teachers. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Shepard, L. (1988). Kindergarten readiness and retention: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 307--333.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Shepard, L. (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. Briston, PA: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. (1992). Alternatives to retention: If flunking doesn't work, what does? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED343209)
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M., Christenson, S., Sinclair, M., Evelo, D., & Thornton, H. (1995). Staying in school: Strategies for middle school students with learning and emotional disabilities. ABC dropout prevention and intervention series. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED398671)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (1990). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: First follow-up study 1990. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (1993a). National Longitudinal Transition Study: A summary of findings. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (1993b). Beyond the report card: The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (1997). Dropout rates in the United States: 1995. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., Newman, L., D'Amico, R., Jay, E., Butler-Nalin, P., Marder, C. et al. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of special education students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED341228)
   Google Scholar
• Smalls, U. (1997). Reacting in the best interest of our students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415980)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (2001, January). Office of the Under Secretary and Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. First annual school improvement report: Executive order on actions for turning around low-performing schools, Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar