Uncertainty in travel demand forecasting models: literature review and research agenda

REFERENCES

• Angrainni, R., T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2009), Continuous choice model of timing and duration of joint activities, Transportation Research Record, 2135, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrainni, R., T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2009), Car allocation between household heads in car deficient households: A decision model, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 8, 301–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2000), Albatross: A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System, EIRASS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2004), Re-induction of Albatross' decision rules using pooled activity-travel diary data and an extended set of land use and costs-related condition states, Transportation Research Record 1831, 230–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2004), A learn-ing-based transportation oriented simulation system, Transportation Research B, 38, 613–633.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2005), Albatross V2: A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System, EIRASS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2008), Towards longitudinal activity-based models of travel demand, Proceedings 13th HKSTS Conference, Hong Kong, China, pp. 439–450.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2009), A dynamic model of activity generation: Development and empirical derivation. In: W.H.K. Lam, S.C. Wong, H.K. Lo (eds.), Companion Volume of the 18th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (ISTTT18), pp. 311–328.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2009), A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation, Transportation Research B, 43, 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A. and H.J.P. Timmermans (2011), A dynamic model of time-budget and activity generation: Development and empirical derivation, Transportation Research C, 19, 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armoogum, J. (2003), Measuring the impact of uncer-tainty in travel demand modeling with a demographic approach, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, D.J. (1980), Uncertainty in the context of highway appraisal, Transportation, 9, 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J. and A.K. Mohammadian (2009), Framework for the development of the agent-based dynamic activ-ity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model, Transportation Letters, 1, 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J., A.K. Mohammadian and S.T. Doherty (2008), Analysis of activity conflict resolution strategies, Transportation Research Board, 2054, 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J., A.K. Mohammadian and M.J. Roorda (2009), Implementation of a scheduling conflict resolution model in an activity scheduling system. Transportation Research Record, 2135, 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J., T.H Rashidi, M Javanmardi and A.K. Mohammadian (2011), Dynamic activity generation model using competing hazard formulation, Proceedings 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bang Sailing, K. and S. Leleur (2011), Transport appraisal and Monte Carlo simulation by use of the CBA-DK model, Transport Policy, 18, 236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellemans, T., D. Janssens, G. Wets, T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2010), Implementation framework and development trajectory of Feathers activity-based simu-lation platform, Proceedings of the 89th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Beser Hugosson, M. (2004), Quantifying uncertainties in the SAMPERS long distance forecasting system, paper presented at WCTR 2004, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Beser Hugosson, M. (2005), Quantifying uncertainties in a national forecasting model, Transportation Research A, 39, 531–547.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C.R., J.Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan and A. Sivakumar (2004), A comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns, Transportation Research Record, 1894, 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. and F. Koppelman (1999), A retrospective and per-spective survey of time-use research. Paper presented at the 78th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat C. and F. Koppelman (2000), Activity-based travel demand analysis: history, results and future directions. Paper presented at the 79th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatta, B.P. and O.I Larson (2007), Measurement errors in data used in transportation models and their conse-quences for parameter estimation, Paper presented at the 11th WCTR Conference, Berkeley, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsall, P.W., A.F. Champerowne, A.C. Mason and A.G. Wilson (1977), Transport modeling: Sensitivity analysis and policy testing, Progress in Planning, 7, 153–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonova, E., W. Castaings and S. Tarantola (2011), Model emulator and moment-independent sensitivity analysis: An application to environmental modeling, to appear in Environmental Modelling and Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman J. and M.E. Ben-Akiva (1999), The day activity schedule approach to travel demand analysis. Paper presented at the 78th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, A.M. (1999), Risk analysis for privately funded trans-port schemes, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, A.M. and M.J. Bright (2003), Reducing or managing the forecasting risk in privately-financed projects, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley M., M. Outwater, N. Jonnalagadda and E. Ruiter (2001), Estimation of an activity-based microsimula-tion model for San Francisco, Paper presented at the 80th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Brail, R.K., ed. (2008), Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions, Lincoln Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brundell-Freij, K. (1997), How good is an estimated logit model? Estimation accuracy analyzed by Monte Carlo simulations, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brundell-Freij, K. (2000), Sampling specification and esti-mation as sources of inaccuracy in complex transport models — Some example analyzed by Monte Carlo simu-lation and bootstrap, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel, J. (2004), Stochastic risk in forecasting vs. policy-oriented uncertainty, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglione, J., J. Freedman, and M. Bradley (2003), Systematic investigation of variability due to random simulation error in an activity-based micro-simulation forecasting model, Transportation Research Record, 1831, 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K. and J. Polak (2009), A Bayesian approach to modeling uncertainty in transport infrastructure project forecasts, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Circella, G., M. Dell'Orco and D. Sassanelli (2005), Uncertainty in choice behavior prediction: a hybrid approach to com-bine fuzziness and randomness, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S.D. and D.P. Waitling (2005), Modeling network time reliability under stochastic demand, Transportation Research B, 39, 119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M.J. and R.J. Johnston (2006), Multivariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transportation model: MEPLAN, Transportation Research D, 11, 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, M., B. Kochan, T. Bellemans, D. Janssens and G. Wets (2011), Assessment of the effect of microsimulation error on key travel indices: Evidence from the activity-based model Feathers, Transportation Research Record 1558, to appear.
   Google Scholar
• Duru, O., E. Bulut and S. Yoshida (2010), Modelling and sim-ulation of variability and uncertainty in ship investments: implementation of fuzzy Monte-Carlo method, Paper presented at the WCTR Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Geenhuizen, M.S.V., H.J. van Zuylen and P. Nijkamp (1998), Limits to predictability, Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, J. and J.L. Bowman (2007), Convergence of an activity-based travel model system to equilibrium: Experimental design and findings, Proceedings of the 11th National Transportation Planning and Application Conference of the Transportation Research Board, Daytona Beach, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, K.M.N. and J.A. Carrasco (2011), Investigating the role of social networks in start time and dura-tion of activities: Trivariate simultaneous econometric model. Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, K.M.N. and E.J. Miller (2009), Modeling activity gen-eration: A utility-based model of activity agenda forma-tion, Transportmetrica, 5, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Q., T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2009), Social influence on location choice dynamics, Proceedings of the 14th HKSTS Conference, Hong Kong, China, 505–515.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., T.A. ` and H.J.P. Timmermans (2010), Habit format and affective responses in location choice dynam-ics. Proceedings of the 12th WCTR Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Han Q., T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2011), Learning and affective responses in location choice dynamics, Environment and Planning B, to appear.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Q., T.A. Arentze, H.J.P. Timmermans, D. Janssens and G. Wets (2008), Modeling context-sensitive dynamic activity-travel behavior under conditions of uncer-tainty incorporating reinforcement learning, habit formation, and behavioral and cognitive adaptation strategies, Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., T.A. Arentze, H.J.P. Timmermans, D. Janssens and G. Wets (2009), Developing dynamic models of activity-travel behavior: Principles, mechanisms, challenges in data collection and methodological issues, Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., T.A. Arentze, H.J.P. Timmermans, D. Janssens and G. Wets (2011), The effects of social networks on choice set dynamics: Results of numerical simulations using an agent-based approach, Transportation Research Part A, 45, 310–322
   Google Scholar
• Henson, K.M., K. G. Goulias and R.G. Golledge (2009), An assessment of activity-based modeling and simula-tion for applications in operational studies, disaster preparedness, and homeland security, Transportation Letters, 1, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, D., G. Wets. T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2007), Modelling short-term dynamics in activity-travel patterns: Conceptual framework of the Feathers model, Proceedings WCTR Conference, Berkeley, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, C.M., Y. Chang and A.A. Amekudzi (2010), Incorporating uncertainty into transportation decision making: A sustainability-oriented approach, Paper presented at the 89th annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, C-H., T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2004), Activity-travel rescheduling decisions: Empirical esti-mation of the Aurora model, Transportation Research Record, 1898, 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jong, G. de, A. Daly, M. Pieters, S. Miller, R. Plasmeijer and F. Hofman (2005), Uncertainty in traffic forecasts: literature review and new results for The Netherlands, Proceedings European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France..
   Google Scholar
• Jong, G. de, A. Daly, M. Pieters, S. Miller, R. Plasmeijer and F. Hofman (2007), Uncertainty in traffic forecasts: literature review and new results for The Netherlands, Transportation, 34, 375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonnalagadda N, J. Freedman, W Davidson and J. Hunt (2001), Development of a micro-simulation activity-based model for San Francisco destination and mode choice models. Paper presented at the 80th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Krisnamurthi, S. and K.M. Kockelman (2006), Propagation of uncertainty in transportation-land use models: An investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP predictions in Austin, Texas, Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Kuwano, M., J. Zhang and A. Fujiwara (2011), Dynamic dis-crete choice model with multidimensional social inter-actions, Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W.H.K., H. Shao and A. Smalee (2008), Modelling impact of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply, Transportation Research B, 42, 890–910.
   Google Scholar
• Lawe, S., J. Lobb, A.W. Sadek and S. Huang (2010), TRANSIMS Implementation in Chittenden County, Vermont: Development, calibration and preliminary sensitivity analysis, Transportation Research Record 2132, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leurent, F. (1998), Sensitivity and error analysis of the dual criteria traffic assignment model, Transportation Research B, 32, 189–204.
   Google Scholar
• Margvelashvili, N. and E.P. Campbell (2011), Sequential data assimilation in fine-resolution models using error-subspace emulators: Theory and preliminary evaluation. To appear in Journal of Marine Systems.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matas, A., J-L. Raymond and A. Ruiz (2010), Traffic forecasts under uncertainty and capacity constraints, Paper pre-sented at the WCTR Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, M.G. (2007), The four step model. In: D.A. Hensher and K.J. Button (eds.), Handbook of Transport Modelling, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, K., M. Balmer, F. Ciari, A. Horni, M. Rieser, R.A. Waraich and K.W. Axhausen (2010), Large-scale agent-based travel demand optimization applied to Switzerland, including mode choice, Paper presented at the 12th World Conference on Transportation Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E.J. and M.J. Roorda (2003), Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling (TASHA), Transportation Research Record, 1831, 114–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., S. Khasnabis and S. Swain (2011), An approach to incorporate uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision making: Detroit river interna-tional crossing case study, Paper presented at the 90th annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, R., R.N. Buliung and M.J. Roorda (2010), Built envi-ronment influences on school travel mode choice in Toronto, Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2156, 150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadian, A. and S.T. Doherty (2005), Mixed logit model of activity-scheduling time horizon, incorporat-ing spatial-temporal flexibility variables, Transportation Research Record, 1926, 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadian, A. and S.T. Doherty (2006), Modeling activity scheduling time horizon: Duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activi-ties, Transportation Research A, 40, 475–490.
   Google Scholar
• Moons, E.A.L.M.G., G.P.M. Wets, M. Aerts, T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2005), The impact of irrel-evant attributes on the performance of classifier systems in generating activity schedules, Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Moons, E.A.L.M.G., G.P.M. Wets, M. Aerts, T.A. Arentze and H.J.P. Timmermans (2005), The impact of simplification in a sequential rule-based model of activity-scheduling behavior, Environment and Planning A, 37, 551–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosa, A.I. (2011), Mixed multinomial logit model of house-hold interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation and social behav-ior, Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, K. (2004), Routing in iteration transportation sim-ulations. In M. Schreckenberg and R. Selten (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, 305-318. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M., K.M. Kockelman and S.T. Waller (2010), Relaxing the multivariate normality assumption in the simulation of transportation system dependencies: An old technique in a new domain, Transportation Letters, 2, 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppeheim, N. (1995), Urban Travel Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
   Google Scholar
• Paez, A. and S. Farber (2011), Recreation and leisure by persons with disabilities: analysis of transportation fac-tors based on Canada's participation activity limitation survey, Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pas, E.I. and S. Sundar (1995), Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior: Some additional evidence, Transportation, 22, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendyala, R.M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto and S. Fujji (2005), FAMOS: Florida activity nobility simulator. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Pontius Jr., R.G. and J. Spencer (2005), Uncertainty in extrap-olations of predictive land-change models, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32 (2), 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, A., and K.M. Kockelman (2002), Uncertainty propagation in an integrated land-use-transportation modeling framework: Output variation via UrbanSim, Transportation Research Record, 1805, 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins J. (1978), Mathematical modeling: The error of our ways, Traffic Engineering and Control, 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rodier, C.J. and R.A. Johnston (2002), Uncertain socioeco-nomic projections used in travel demand and emissions models: could plausible errors result in air quality non-conformity? Transportation Research A, 36, 613–631.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, M.J., E.J. Miller and K. Habib (2008), Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Micro simulation Model. Transportation Research A, 42, 360–375.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, M.J., E.J. Miller and N. Kruchten (2006), Incorporating within-household interactions into a mode choice model using a genetic algorithm for parameter estimation. Transportation Research Record, 1985, 171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, M.J. and T. Ruiz (2008), Long and short-term dynamics in Activity Scheduling: A structural equations approach, Transportation Research A, 42, 545–562.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T. and M.J. Roorda (2008), Analysis of planning decisions during the activity scheduling process. Transportation Research Record, 2054, 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T., and M.J. Roorda (2011), Assessing planning deci-sions by activity type during the scheduling process, Transportmetrica, 7, 417–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlich, R. and K.W. Axhausen (2005), Analysing interper-sonal variability for homogeneous groups of travelers, Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs- und Raumplanung 296, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Sevéikovd, H., A.E. Raftery and P.A. Waddell (2007), Assessing uncertainty in urban simulations using Bayesian meld-ing, Transportation Research Part B, 41, 652–669.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L, R. Beckman, K. Baggerly, D. Anson and M. Williams (1995), TRANSIMS: TRansportation ANalysis and SIMulation System: Project Summary and Status.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H.J.P. (2009), On the relevance of the prin-ciple of parsimony for developing agent-based models in urban planning. In: Proceedings Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H.J.P. and J. Zhang (2009), Modelling house-hold activity travel behaviour, Transportation Research B, 43, 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• Veldhuisen, K., H.J.P. Timmermans and L.L. Kapoen (2000), Ramblas: A regional planning model based on the micro-simulation of daily activity travel patterns, Environment and Planning A, 32, 427–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldhuisen, K.J., H.J.P. Timmermans, and L.L. Kapoen (2000), Microsimulation model of activity-travel pat-terns and traffic flows: Specification, validation tests and Monte Carlo error, Transportation Research Record, 1706, 126–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P., M. Bradley and J.L. Bowman (2004), Activity-based travel forecasting in the United States: Progress since 1995 and prospects for the future. Proceedings of the Conference on Progress in Activity-Based Models, Maastricht, 28–32 May (CD Rom).
   Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P., R. Donnelly and S. Gupta (2008), Network equi-librium with activity-based microsimulation models: The New York experience. Transportation Research Record, 2054, 102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P., E. Peterson and R. Donnelly (2002), Micro-simulation in travel demand modeling: Lessons from the New York "best practice" model, Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.L. (2005), Making household micro-simulation of travel and activities accessible to planners, Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.L., J. Li, S. Srinivasan and D. Bolduc (2010), Travel demand models in the developing world: Correcting for measurement errors, Transportation Letters, 2, 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D. and J. Li (2011), A two-level multiple discrete con-tinuous model of time allocation to virtual and physical activities, Transportmetrica, 7, 395–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, I and W. Ralston Jr., (2006), The Scenario Planning Handbook: Developing Strategies in Uncertain Times. Thompson Publishing, Washington DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. and A. Chen. (2011), Uncertainty analysis of a com-bined travel demand model. In: Sumalee, A., W.H.K. Lam, H.W. Lo and B. Siu (eds.), Transportation and Urban Sustainability, HKSTS, Hong Kong, pp. 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. and A. Chen. (2011), Sensitivity-based uncer-tainty analysis of a combined travel demand model. Transportation Research Record, 1535, to appear.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S-Y. and K.G. Goulias (2010), Impact of time-space prism accessibility on time use and its propagation through intra-household interaction, Transportation Letters, 2, 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., C. Xie and S.T Waller (2011), An integrated equilibrium travel demand model with nested logit structure: Problem formulation and uncertainty analysis, Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. and K.M. Kockelman (2001), The propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models: An explor-atory analysis, Annals of Regional Science 36, 909–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, F. and H. van Zuylen (2010), Uncertainty and pre-dictability of urban link travel time: A delay distribution based analysis, Proceedings of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ziems, S., S. Bhargava, J. Plotz and R.M. Pendyala (2011), Stochastic variability in microsimulation modeling and convergence of corridor-level characteristics. To appear in Transportation Research Record 3560
   Google Scholar