Dull Faces: Exoteric and Esoteric Facts and Theories Relative to Amblyopia

References

• Scobee RG. Oculorotary Muscles. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Scobee RG. A Child's Eyes. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Albert DM, Edwards DD. The History of Ophthalmology. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, Inc.; 1990. p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Buffon GL: Dissertation sur la cause der strabisme. Memories d'Acadamie des sciences pour 1743 Amsterdam 1748. Cited by Wilkinson O. Strabismus: Its Etiology and Treatment. Boston: Meado; 1943.
   Google Scholar
• Worth C. Squint: Its Causes, Pathology and Treatment. London: J. Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd.; 1901.
   Google Scholar
• von Graefe A: 1888 Hanbuok Ges Augenhk. 6: 141. Cited by Revell MJ. Strabismus: A History of Orthoptic Techniques. London: Barrie and Jenkins; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs E: 1898 Textbook of Ophthalmology. New York: Appleton (translated from second German edition by A. Duane). Referred to by Henderson J. Symposium of New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Burian HM: Thoughts on the nature of amblyopia ex anopsia. Am Orthopt J 1956; 6: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Linksz A: Theory of Pleoptics. International Ophthalmology Clinics (IOC); 1961. 1/4, p. 747–785.
   Google Scholar
• Demer JL, von Noorden GK, Volkow ND, Gould KL: Brain activity in amblyopia. Am Orthopt J 1991; 41: 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kivlin JD, Flynn JT: Therapy of anisometropic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1981; 18: 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard ZF and Manley D: Long-term results in the treatment of unilateral high myopia with amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 397–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal AR, von Noorden GK: Clinical finding and therapy in unilateral high myopia associated with amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1971; 71: 973–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampolsky A, Flom B, Weymouth P, et al: Unequal corrected visual acuity as related to anisometropic. Arch Ophthalmol 1955; 54: 893–905.
   Google Scholar
• France TD: Progressive anisometropia in strabismic patients. In: Campos, ed. Proceedings of the V International Strabismus Association Meeting. Rome: 1986. p. 139–149.
   Google Scholar
• France LW: Luminance and the Neutral Density filter in the classification of amblyopia. Am Orthopt J 1997; 47: 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Trans Am Ophthalmol S. Hartford: 1903.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh M: Visual distortion in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1958; 42: 449–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selenow A, Ciuffreda KJ: Vision function recovery during orthoptic therapy in an adult esotropic amblyope. J Am Optom Assoc 1986; 57: 132–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cibis L, Hurtt J, Rasicovici A: A clinical study of separation. Am Orthopt J 1968; 18: 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• von Noorden GK, Lipsius RM: Experiences with pleoptics in 58 patients with strabismic amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1964; 58: 41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart J, Burian HM: A study of separation difficulty: Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngson RM: Anomaly in visual acuity testing in children. Br J Ophthalmol 1975; 59: 168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Klein SA: Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vision Res 1985; 25: 979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flom MC, Bedett HE: Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity, and non-acuity features. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1985; 62: 153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Schlossman A. Prognosis, Management and Results of Pleoptic Treatment. In: IOClinics. Linksz A and Guerry D III, eds. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1981. 1: 829–846.
   Google Scholar
• Guibor GP. Squint and Allied Conditions. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer M. Clinical Orthoptics: Diagnosis and Treatment. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1953. p. 356.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Spielmann A: Accommodation et amblyopie. Bull Mem Soc Ophthal Fr 1970; 83: 196–202.
   Google Scholar
• Lennarson LW, France TD, Portnoy J, Scott W: A comparison of distance and near vision in amblyopia. In: Ravault AP, Lenk M, eds. Transactions Vth International Orthoptic Congress. Cannes:LIPS; 1984. p. 329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer G: Focusing responses of the human eye. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1966; 43: 221–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heath GG: The influence of visual acuity on accommodative responses of the eye. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1956; 33: 513–524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toates FM: A model of accommodation. Vision Res 1970; 10: 1069–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF: Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans. Trans Ophth Soc UK 1979; 99: 391–397.
   Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Howell ER: Threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 1977; 17: 1047–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Carkeet A: Amblyopia: A consequence of abnormal visual development. In: Simon K, ed. Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hamer RD: Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant. Vision Res 1990; 30: 1475–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Levi DM, Selenow A. Amblyopia: Basic and Clinical Aspects. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991. p. 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Rumpf D: Contrast and accommodation in amblyopia. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1445–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Fisher SK: Impairment of contrast discrimination in amblyopic eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 461–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France TD, France LW: Low-contrast visual acuity cards in pediatric ophthalmology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988:226: 158–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France TD: The role of contrast sensitivity in visual acuity testing. Am Orthopt J 1986; 36: 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ: The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Vision Sciences 1988; 2: 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Regan D, Neima D: Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 1192–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leguire LE, Suh S, Rogers GL, Bremer DL: SKILL card results in amblyopic children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabmisus 1994; 31: 256–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupersmith MJ, Siegel IM, Carr RE: Subtle disturbances of vision with compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway measured by CS. Ophthalmolmology 1982; 89: 68–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisel TN, Hubel DH: Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol 1963; 26: 978–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Papakostopulos D: Electro oculographic abnormalities in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 218–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arden GB, Barnard WM, Mushin AS: Visually evoked responses in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1974; 58: 183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokyigit B, Gungel H, Yalmaz OF: Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in amblyopia. Transactions 26th European Strabismus Assoc (Barcelona) 2000: 275–278.
   Google Scholar
• Choi MY, Lee KM, Hwang JM, Choi DG, Lee DS, Park KH, Yu YS: Comparison between anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 1052–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arden GB, Vaegan, Hogg CR, Powell DJ, Carter RM: Pattern ERGs are abnormal in many amblyopes. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1980; 100: 453–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arden GB, Wooding SL: Pattern ERG in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess RF, Baker CL, Verhoeve JN, Keesey UT, France TD: The pattern-evoked electroretinogram: Its variability in normals and its relationship to amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1610–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Brown B, Edwards MH: Investigation of multifocal visual evoked potential in anisometropic and esotropic amblyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 38: 2033–2040.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol S: Visual evoked potentials in checkerboard pattern stimuli in strabismic amblyopia. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Visual Evoked Potential in Man: New Developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Campos EC, Gulli R: Lack of alternation in patients treated for strabismic amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 63–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner RL, Charles ST, Flynn JT: Pupillary responses in rivalry and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Trimarchi F, Casali F, Franchini F, Gilardi E: Pupillographic responses in patients with untreated strabismic amblyopia. In: Moore S, Mein J, and Stockbridge L, eds. Orthoptics Past, Present and Future. Proceeding of the 3rd International Orthoptic Congress. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical; 1976. p. 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger K: Pupillenstorungen und amblyopie. Ber Zussamenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 1961; 63: 275.
   Google Scholar
• Portnoy JZ, Thompson HS, Lennarson L. (aka France L), Corbett JJ: Pupillary defects in amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96: 609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Noorden GK, Mackensen G: Pursuit movements of normal and amblyopic eyes: An electro-ophthalmologic study—I. Physiology of pursuit movements. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 325–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Noorden GK, Mackensen G: Pursuit movements of normal and amblyopic eyes—II. Pursuit movements in amblyopic patients. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 477–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukai S, Tsutsui J, Nakamura Y: Abnormal pursuit movements of the fellow eye in amblyopia with strabismus. In: Moore S, Mein J, and Stockbridge L, eds. Orthoptics Past, Present and Future. Proceeding of the 3rd International Orthoptic Congress. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical; 1976. p. 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• von Noorden G: Reaction time in normal and amblyopic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1961; 66: 695–701.
   Google Scholar
• Hamasaki DI, Flynn JT: Amblyopic eyes have longer reaction time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 846–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor CM, Levi DM: Disturbances of small-field horizontal and vertical optokinetic nystagmus in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980; 19: 668–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D: A hypothesis-based approach to clinical psychophysics and to the design of visual tests. Proctor Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1311–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto F, Uchida S: Kinetic vision in refractive amblyopia. In: Proceedings VIIIth International Orthoptic Congress. Kyoto, Japan: 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Giaschi D, Regan D, Kraft S, Hong XH: Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 2483–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel GL, Brattan PE, Bedell HD: Are the dominant eyes of amblyopes normal? Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980; 57: 1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Bremer DL. Amblyopia: The normal eye is not normal. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990; 27: 32.
   Google Scholar
• Duane A: Normal values of the accommodation of all ages. JAMA 1912; 59: 1010–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Duane A: Studies in monocular and binocular accommodation with their clinical applications. Am J Ophthalmol 1922; 5: 865–877.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham SV: Accommodation in the amblyopic eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1961; 52: 197–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood ICJ, Tomlinson A: The accommodative response in amblyopia. Am J Optom 1975; 52: 243–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschen DG, Kendall JH, Riesen KS: An evaluation of the accommodative response in amblyopic eyes. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 597–602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haynes H, White BL, Held R: Visual accommodation in human infants. Science 1965; 148: 528–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohn G, Van Hof-van Djin: Development of spatial vision. In: Vision and Visual Dysfunction Cronly-Dillon J, ed.: Volume 10, Regan D, ed. Spatial Vision. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1991. p. 86.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Adele P: Evoked potential estimates of visual accommodation in infants. Vision Res 1983; 23: 851–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslin R: Infant accommodation and convergence. In: Simons K, ed. Early Visual Development Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 1993. p. 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Otto J, Safra D: Methods and results of quantitative determination of accommodation in amblyopia and strabismus. In: Moore S, Mein J, and Stockbridge L, eds. Orthoptics Past, Present and Future. Proceeding of the 3rd International Orthoptic Congress. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical; 1976. p. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Kenyon RV: Accommodative vergence and accommodation in normals, amblyopes, and strabismics. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ, eds. Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects. Boston: Butterworth; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Levi LM, Carkeet A: A consequence of abnormal visual development. In: Early Visual Development: Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Kiorpes L, Boothe RG: Accommodative range in amblyopic monkeys (Macaca nemestrina). Vision Res 1984; 24: 1829–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda KJ, Hokoda SC, Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Selenow A: Static aspects of accommodation in human amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 60: 436–449.
   Google Scholar
• Hering E. The Theory of Binocular Vision. Bridgeman B, Stark L, eds. New York: Plenum Press; 1977 (translated from Die Lehre vom binokularen Sehen 1868).
   Google Scholar
• Hokoda SC, Ciuffreda KJ: Measurement of accommodative amplitude in amblyopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1982; 2: 205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsumi T, Sugasawa J, Ishida U, Nobe Y: Accommodative response in anisometropic amblyopia with successfully recovered visual acuity. In: Ravault AP, Lenk M, eds. Transactions Fifth International Orthoptic Congr. Cannes LIPS; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Jampolsky A: Determination of diagnostic characteristics: Selected texts. In: Jampolsky A, Scott AB, eds. International Ophthalmology Clinics (IOC) 1964; 4: 578.
   Google Scholar