Functional Benefits of Sensory and Motor Evaluation Before Strabismus Surgery

References

• Montori VM, Guyatt GH: Corruption of the evidence as threat and opportunity for evidence-based medicine. Harvard Health Policy Review 2007; 8: 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS: Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 1996; 312: 71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher AE: Controversy over “contradiction”: Should randomized trials always trump observational studies? Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 384–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris H, O'Connor AR, Stephenson MG, Mitchell M, Price GJ, Anderson S: Clinical assessment of stereopsis and its functional significance. Br Ir Orthopt J 2005; 2: 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lueder GT, Arnoldi K: Does “touching four” on the Worth 4-dot test indicate fusion in young children? Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1237–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins PF: The effect of dissociation on the sensory status. Am Orthopt J 2002; 52: 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Leske DA, Holmes JM: Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis. J AAPOS 2004; 8: 28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathacopoulos RA, Rosenbaum AL, Zanoni D, Stager DR, McCall LC, Ziffer AJ, Everett M: Distance stereoacuity: Assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim C, Mutlu FM, Chen Y, Altinsoy HI: Assessment of central and peripheral fusion and near and distance stereoacuity in intermittent exotropic patients before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128: 222–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WE, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Mohney BG, Birch EE, Weakley Jr DR, Holmes JM: Improvement in distance stereoacuity following surgery for intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ, Morton GV: Postoperative binocularity in adults with longstanding strabismus. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 316–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris RJ, Scott WE, Dickey CF: Fusion after surgical alignment of longstanding strabismus in adults. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SL, Stager Sr DR, Felius J: Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 931–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JT, Guyton DL: Ophthalmic prisms: Measurement errors and how to minimize them. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JT, Guyton DL: Ophthalmic prisms: Deviant behavior at near. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 684–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helveston EM: Prism placement: Measurements of horizontal and vertical deviations with the head tilted. Arch Ophthalmol 1975; 93: 483–486.
   Google Scholar
• Scattergood KD, Brown MH, Guyton DL: Artifacts introduced by spectacle lenses in the measurement of strabismic deviations. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96: 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ: Intractable diplopia after strabismus surgery in adults. Arch Ophthalmology 2002; 120: 1498–1504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan AO: Persistent diplopia following secondary intraocular lens placement in patients with sensory strabismus from uncorrected monocular aphakia. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 51–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleberry C, Arnoldi K: Predicting postoperative paradoxical diplopia. Am Orthopt J 2003; 53: 88–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnoldi K: The Burian Memorial Lecture: Factors contributing to the outcome of sensory testing in patients with anomalous binocular correspondence. Transactions of the Xth International Orthoptic Congress (on CD-ROM) 2004; 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Aust W, Welge-Lussen L: Preoperative and postoperative changes in the angle of squint following long-term preoperative prismatic compensation. Ann Ophthalmol 1971; 3: 517–523.
   Google Scholar
• Berard PV: The use of prisms in the pre- and postoperative treatment of deviations of comitant squint. In: Fells P, ed. Proceedings of the First Congress of the International Strahismological Association. St Louis: Mosby; 1971, pp. 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Jampolsky A: A simplified approach to strabismus diagnosis. In: Symposium on Strabismus, Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1971, pp. 34–92.
   Google Scholar
• PPrism Adaptation Study Research Group: Efficacy of prism adaptation in the surgical management of acquired esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 1248–1256.
   Google Scholar
• PRepka MX, Wentworth D, Prism Adaptation Study Research Group: Predictors of prism response during prism adaptation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991; 28: 202–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRepka MX, Connett JE, Scott WE, Prism Adaptation Study Research Group: The one-year surgical outcome after prism adapatation for the management of acquired esotropia. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 922–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutschke PJ, Keech RV: Surgical outcome after prism adaptation for esotropia with a distance-near disparity. J AAPOS 2001; 5: 189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Stewart SA: Prism adaptation for esotropia with a distance-near disparity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992; 29: 12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Trotter J, Watts P, Kraft SP, Abdolell M: Preoperative prism adaptation in acquired esotropia with convergence excess. J AAPOS 2003; 7: 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron A, Merin S: The pre-op adaptation test (PAT) in the surgery of exotropia. Acta Strabologica 1985; 2: 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsuki H, Hasbe S, Okano M, Furuse T: Comparison of surgical results of responders and nonresponders to the prism adaptation test in intermittent exotropia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997; 75: 528–531.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsuki H, Hasebe S, Kono R, Yamane T, Fujiwara H, Shiraga F: Prism adaptation response is useful for predicting surgical outcome in selected types of intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131: 117–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielmann A: A translucent occluder for studying eye position under unilateral or bilateral cover test. Am Orthopt J 1986; 36: 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Aman-Ullah M, Day C, Abdolell M, Smith D: The role of binocular occlusion in determining the preferred eye for fixation in intermittent exotropia: A guide to choosing the eye for unilateral surgery. Am Orthopt J 2006; 56: 126–132.
   Google Scholar
• Benegas N, Kushner BJ, Morton G: The +10 diopter lens occluder. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1071–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ, Morton G: Measurement of strabismus in the shortened exam lanes versus the 20-foot lane. Ann Ophthalmol 1982; 14: 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon MA, Gibson F: Strabismus measurements using the alternating and simultaneous prism cover tests: A comparative study. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2001; 38: 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JD, Davies GT: Monofixational intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ: Occurrence of monofixational exotropia after exotropia surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 1082–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mims III JL, Wood RC: The maximum motor fusion test: A parameter for surgery for acquired esotropia. J AAPOS 2000; 4: 211–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ela-Dalman N, Velez G, Thacker N, Britt MT, Velez FG: Maximum motor fusion combined with one-hour preoperative prism adaptation test in patients with acquired esotropia. J AAPOS 2006; 10: 561–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow FW: The influence of prolonged monocular occlusion in revealing errors of the muscle balance. Br J Ophthalmol 1920; 4: 145–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scobee RG. The Oculorotary Muscles. St. Louis: Mosby; 1952, p. 171.
   Google Scholar
• Burian HM, Franceschetti AT: Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the classification of exodeviations. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1970; 68: 56–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iacobucci I, Henderson JW: Occlusion in the preoperative treatment of exodeviations. Am Orthopt J 1965; 15: 42–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burian HM: Exodeviations: Their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 62: 1161–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederecker O, Scott WE: The value of diagnostic occlusion for intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1975; 25: 90–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gürlü VP, Erda N: Diagnostic occlusion test in intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2008; 12: 504–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippman S, Weintraub D, Cohen KR, Weseley AC: Prisms in the preoperative diagnosis of intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J 1988; 38: 101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ: Richard G. Scobee Memorial Lecture: Exotropic deviations: A functional classification and approach to treatment. Am Orthopt J 1988:38: 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ, Morton GV: Distance/near differences in intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 478–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson JH, Arnoldi K: The gradient AC/A ratio: What's really normal? Am Orthopt J 2004; 54: 125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnoldi KA, Reynolds JD: Diagnosis of pseudodivergence excess exotropia secondary to high accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Am Orthopt J 2006; 56: 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Simons K, Arnoldi K, Brown MH: Color dissociation artifacts in double Maddox rod cyclodeviation testing. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1897–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feibel RM, Roper-Hall G: Measurement of the field of binocular single vision in the evaluation of incomitant paralytic strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 800–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ: Binocular field expansion in adults after surgery for esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112: 639–643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark JT: Obstacles to fusion: Strabismus and diplopia. Am Orthopt J 2008; 58: 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller J, Ellis FJ: Unique features of adult strabismus. Am Orthopt J 2008; 58: 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins RH: The value of preoperative and postoperative diplopia testing. Am Orthopt J 2008; 58: 35–38.
   Google Scholar