Success in the female entrepreneurial networking process

References

• Aaltio-Marjosola, Iiris (1999). Case-tutkimus metodisena lähestymistapana. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from, http://www.metodix.com/testi/harri/metodit/iiris2.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. C., Zimmer H. Entrepreneurship through social networks. The art and science of entrepreneurship. Sexton D. L., Smilor R. W.Ballinger: Cambridge, 1986; 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E., Reese P. R., Dubini P. Women on the Verge of a Breakthrough? Networking Among Entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 1989; 1: 339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson A. R., Jack S. L. The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or lubricant?. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2002; 14: 193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J. W. Motives in fantasy, action and society. van Nostrand: Princeton NJ, 1958
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J. W. An introduction to motivation. van Nostrand: Princeton NJ, 1964
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J. W., Feather N. T. A theory of achievement motivation. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1966
   Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J. Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review. 1968; 58(2): 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J. Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on theory building. Bull I., Thomas H., Willard G.Elsevier Science: Oxford UK, 1995; 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes H. J.Jr. Class and commettees in a Norwegian island parish. Human relations. 1954; 7: 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birley S. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing. 1985; 1: 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bott E. Family and Social Network. Roles, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. London: Tavistock Publication, 1957
   Google Scholar
• Bridge S., O'Neill K., Cromie S. Understanding enterprise, entrepreneurship & small business. MacMillan Press: London, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bruderl J., Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics. 1998; 10(3): 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush G. G. Research on woman business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future direction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1992; 16(4): 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Caird S. A review of methods of measuring enterprising attributes. Durham University Business School: Durham UK, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Cassell C., Symon C. Qualitative research in work contexts. Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. Cassell C., Symon C.Sage: London, 1994; 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper A. C., Gimenogascon F. J. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing. 1994; 9(5): 371–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chell E. Towards researching the ‘opportunistic entrepreneur’. A social constructionist approach and research agenda. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2000; 9(1): 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Chu P. Social network models of overseas Chinese entrepreneurship: The experience in Hong Kong and Canada. Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l. Administration/ Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. 1996; 13(4): 358–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmén E. Svensk industriell företagsverksamhet [Business activities in Sweden]. IUI: Stockholm, 1950
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson P. The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth. Katz J., Shepherd S.Elsevier/JAI Press: Amsterdam/London, 2003; 6: 315–372.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L. & Naldi, L. (2004) Research on small firm growth: a review. Retrieved Retrieved May 13, 2008, from, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00002072/01/EISB_version_Research_on_small_firm_growth.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donckels R., Lambrecht J. Networks and Small Business Growth: An Explanatory Model. Small Business Economics. 1995; 7: 273–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doz Y., Hamel G. Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business School Press: Boston MA, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Duchesneau D. A., Gartner W. B. A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry. Frontiers of entrepreneurial research. Kirchoff B. A.Babson College: Wellesley MA, 1988; 372–386.
   Google Scholar
• Du Rietz A., Henrekson M. Testing the female under performance hypothesis. Small Business Economics. 2000; 14(1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 1989; 14(4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein S., O'Brien M. The person situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 1985; 98: 513–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford D. The Development of Buyer-Seller Relationships in Industrial Markets. European Journal of Marketing. 1980; 14(5–6): 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsgren M., Johansson J. International studies in global change: 2 Managing networks in international business. Gordon and Breach: London, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W., B.1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review. 10, 698–706. s. 698–701.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner W. B. Who is an entrepreneur?’ is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business. 1988; 13: 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner W. B. Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship research? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. 2001; 25(4): 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner W. B., Birley S. Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing. 2002; 17: 387–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbreth L. Why women succeed in business. North American Review. 1928; CCXXVI(846): 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher G. Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. Grabher G.Routledge: London/New York, 1993; 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Greve A. Networks and Entrepreneurship. An Analysis of Social Relations, Occupational Background, and Use of Contacts During the Establishment Process. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1995; 11(1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson E. Qualitative Methods in Management Research. Sage: Newbury Park CA, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E. (1993). Case Study Research in Management. School of Business. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. ( revised 2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., F. (1994). Case Studies in Organisational Research. In Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research – A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial Networks and New Organization Growth. ’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., Summer, pp. 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson, H. (1982). International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods – An Interaction approach. New York:Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes G. W., Haynes D. C. The debt structure of small businesses owned by women in 1987 and 1993. Journal of Small Business Management. 1999; 37(2): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K. The female entrepreneur – Woman and/or entrepreneur? Aspects of women entrepreneurship. Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development: Stockholm, 1996; 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A., Vaidyanath D. Managing strategic alliances to achieve a competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 2002; 28(3): 413–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland R. D., Reutzel C. R., Webb J. W. Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold?. Academy of Management Journal. 2005; 48(4): 556–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarillo J. C. Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources. Journal of Business Venturing. 1989; 4: 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. (1978). Enterprise and environment, a study of an organization: A report from a research of family enterprises and their conditions in four small villages in Jönköping region. Växjö High School in Växjö.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson B. Business formation: A network approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1988; 31: 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson J., Mattson L., G. Inter – Organizational Relations in Industrial Systems – a Network Approach compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach. International Studies of Management and Organization. 1987; 17(1): 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleva T. Family firms and networks. The role of trust and commitment: A case study of two Finnish furniture networks. Taloustieteiden tiedekunta, Jyväskylän yliopisto: Jyväskylä, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Kanter R. Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books: New York, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Knoke D. Organizational networks and corporate social capital. Corporate social capital and liability. Leenders R., Gabbay S.Kluwer: Boston, 1999; 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, A. (1993). At the margins of the economy. Women's selfemployment in Finland 1960–1990. Turku: Publications of the Turku Scholl of Economics and Business Administration., Series A 9.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrö, P. (2001). The reality of women entrepreneurs – Questioning men's criteria for success. Presented in the 2001 Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Jönköping Sweden, June 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrö P., Hyrsky K. From marginality to centre: Women's entrepreneurship policy challenges governments gender neutrality in Finland. Women entrepreneurship and social capital. Dialogue and construction. Aaltio I., Kyrö P., Sundin E.Copenhagen Business School Press: Helsinki, 2008; 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lahti A. Revolutionary rating method for innovative SME's. Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja D-221. Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration: Helsinki, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H. Entrepreneurhip and development. American Economic Review. 1968; 58: 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss C. (engl. transl. 1969). The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Beacon Press: Boston, 1949
   Google Scholar
• Lintunen, L. (2000). ‘Who is the winner entrepreneur?’ An epistemological study of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lipparini A., Sopero M. The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks. Journal of Business Venturing. 1994; 9(2): 125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littunen H. Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Business Economics. 2000; 15(1): 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni G., Ornati O. A. Constellations of firms and new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing. 1988; 3: 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillat D. Milieux et dynamique territorial de Innovation. Revue canadienne de sciences régionales. 1992; XV(2): 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Maillat D. Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 1995; 17: 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Maysami R. C., Goby P. Female business owners in Singapore and elsewhere: A review of studies. Journal of Small Business Management. 1999; 37(2): 96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland D. C. The achieving society. Free Press/Collier-McMillan: New York, 1961
   Google Scholar
• McClelland D. C. Achievement motivation can be developed. Harvard Business Review. 1965; 7: 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland D. C., Winter D. G. Motivating economic achievement. Free Press: New York, 1969
   Google Scholar
• McKenna E. F. M. Psychology in business. Lawrence Erlbaum: London, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Melin L. The field-of-force metaphor: A study in industrial change. International Studies of Management and Organization. 1987; XVII(1): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meller P., Marfan M. Small and large industry: Employment generation, linkages, and key sectors. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 1981; 29(2): 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D. P., Buttner E. H. Women entrepreneurs. Moving beyond the glass ceiling. Sage Publications: London, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. 1998; 23: 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. (1997). Johdatus tieteenfilosofiaan, käsitteen- ja teorianmuodostus. Nidotun laitoksen 1.painos. Kirja ilmestyi ensimmäisen kerran 1980. Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava, Keuruu. s. 193.
   Google Scholar
• Ostgaard T. A., Birley S. New Venture Growth and Personal Networks. Journal of Business Research. 1996; 36(1): 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker S. C. The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. M. What is a processual analysis?. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 1997; 13(4): 337–348.
   Google Scholar
• Powell W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996; 41: 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. (1998). How firms come to be? Towards a theory of the prefirm. Dissertation: Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2006). ‘What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial?’. Case and Teaching paper series, UVA-ENT-0065. University of Virginia – The Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker and Humblot: Leipzig, 1912
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1928). The instability of capitalism. in The Economic Journal. September. pp. 361–386.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. Business cycles. Porcupine Press: Philadelphia PA, 1939/1982
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (6th printing 1987). Unwin Paperbacks: London, 1942
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal of Economic History. 7( 2) (Nov., 1947), 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1951). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934).
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA, 1934/1962
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In R. V.Clemence, Essays – On entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism. (pp. 253–271.). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. (Reprinted from Change and the entrepreneur (1949). Prepared by the Research Center in Entrepreneurial History, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.).
   Google Scholar
• Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review. 2000; 25(1): 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shionoya Y. Schumpeter and idea of social science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Slotte-Kock S., Coviello N. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. January. 2010; 34(1): 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Snehota, I. (1990). Notes on a theory of business enterprise. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Business Administration. Uppsala Sweden: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Sonfield, M. C. & Barbato, R. J. (1999). Credit and equity support as components of self-employment programs. Retrieved September 22, 1999 from http://www.soc.titech.ac.jp/icm/micro/sonfield-barbato.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson H. H., Gumpert D. E. The heart of entrepreneurship. The entrepreneurial venture. Sahlman A. W., Stevensson H. H.Harvard Business School: Boston MA, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Strake J. The ability/performance dimension of self-esteem implications of women's achievement behaviour. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1979; 3(4): 365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundin E. Women's entrepreneurship – Reflection of society at large. Aspects of Women Entrepreneurship. Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development, B: Stockholm, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Szarka J. Networking and small firms. International Small Business Journal. 1990; 8: 10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons J. A. Entrepreneurial mind. Brick House: Andover, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Timmons J. A. New venture creation. Entrepreneurship for the 21st century. Irwin McGraw-Hill: Singapore, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, J., & Spinelli, S. (2009). New Venture Creation, Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 8th edition/2009.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 1993; 8(3): 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, S. (1989). Problems of small venture start-up, survival, and growth: A transaction set approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth. Katz J. A.JAI Press: Greenwich CT, 1997; 3
   Google Scholar
• Walls T. R., Dowler D. L., Cordingly K., Orslene L. E., Greer J. D. Microenterprising and people with disabilities: Strategies for success and failure. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2001; 67(2): 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter F., Lasch F. Entrepreneurship research in Europe: Taking stock and looking forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2008; 32(2): 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wincent J., Westerberg M. Personal traits of CEOs, inter-firm networking and entrepreneurship in their firms: Investigating strategic SME network participants. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2005; 10(3): 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager M. A. Women in business. Volume the international library of critical writings in business history. An Elgar Reference Collection: Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Yin R. Case study research, design and methods. Sage: Beverly Hills CA, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer T. W., Scarborough N. M. Entrepreneurship and new venture formation. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River NJ, 1996
   Google Scholar