411
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation – the (not so) softlysoftly approach to governance and its consequences for compulsory education in the Nordic countries

Pages 671-687 | Published online: 01 Dec 2011

References

  • Abbott, K. & Snidal, D. (2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. International Or-ganization, 54 (3), 421–456.
  • Aho, E., Pitkänen, K. and Sahlberg, P. (2006) Policy Development and Reform Principles of Basic and Secondary Education in Finland since 1968, Washington, DC: The World Bank, Educa-tion Working paper series, No. 2.
  • Andersen, V. N., Dahler-Larsen, P., & Strombwk P., Carsten (2009) Quality assurance and evalu-ation in Denmark. Journal of Education Policy, 24 (2): 135–147.
  • Antikainen, A. (2006) In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Edu-cational Research 50 (3), 229–243.
  • Antikainen, A. (2010) The capitalist state and education: The case of restructuring the Nordic, Current Sociology, 58 (4): 530–550.
  • Ball, S. (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18 (2): 215–228.
  • Bjärklund, A., Edin, P.-A., Fredriksson, P. and Krueger, A. (2004) Education, Equality, and Effi-ciency — An Analysis of Swedish School Reforms during the 1990s, IFAU — Education, Equal-ity, and Efficiency Report.
  • Brandsen, T., Boogers, M. & Tops P. (2006) Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guidelines. Public Administration Review, 66 (4): 546–553.
  • Clarke, J. (2004) Changing Welfare, Changing States. London: Sage.
  • Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage. 2nd Edition
  • Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (2009) National Testing of Pupils in Eu-rope: Objectives, Organization and Use of Results, Eurydice, Brussels.
  • Eurydice (2004) Evaluation of Schools Providing Compulsory Education in Europe, Eurydice, Directorate-General for Education and Culture, European Commission: Brussels.
  • Eurydice (2009/10a) Organisation of the education system in Denmark http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/indexen.php
  • Eurydice (2009/10b) Organisation of the education system in Finland http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/indexen.php
  • Eurydice (2009/10c) Organisation of the education system in Iceland http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/indexen.php
  • Eurydice (2009/10d) Organisation of the education system in Norway http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/indexen.php
  • Eurydice (2009/10e) Organisation of the education system in Sweden http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/indexen.php
  • Foss Hansen, H., (2009) Educational evaluation in Scandinavian countries: Converging or diverg-ing practices? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53 (1): 71-87.
  • Grek, S., Lawn, M., Lingard, B., Ozga, J., Rinne, R., Segerholm, C., Simola, H. (2009a) National policy brokering & the construction of the European Education Space in England, Sweden, Finland & Scotland. Comparative Education, 45 (1): 5–21.
  • Grek, S., Lawn, M., Lingard, B. & Varjo, J. (2009b) North by northwest: Quality assurance & evalu-ation processes in European education. Journal of Education Policy, 24 (2): 121–133.
  • Henning Loeb, I. and Lumsden Wass, K. (2011) Internal marketization and teachers defending their educational setting. Accounting and mobilization in Swedish upper secondary education. Education Inquiry 2 (4) (this issue).
  • Hudson, C. (2007) Governing the governance of education — the state strikes back? European Educational Research Journal, 6 (3): 266–282.
  • Hudson, C. (2010) Transforming the educative state in the Nordic countries? In Jakobi, A. P., Martens, K. & Wolf, K. D. (eds.) Education in Political Science Discovering a Neglected Field, London & New York: Routledge.
  • Lankinen, T. (2010) Case studt/Finland presented at Building Blocks for Education: Whole Sys-tem Reform conference 13-14 September, Toronto, Canada.
  • Leth Nielsen, K. & Munch Thorsen, K. (2003) Development of Methods of Self-Evaluation in the Danish School Sector, ICSEI Australia.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (2005) The Ministry of Education, Science and Cul-ture in Iceland, Reykjavik: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
  • Moos, L. (2009) Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8 (3): 397–406.
  • Neave, G. (1998) The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education 33 (3): 265-84
  • Newman, J. (2005) Introduction. In Newman, J (ed.) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–15.
  • Norwegian Directorate for Education & Training (2011) OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes Country Background, Report for Norway.
  • Nusche, D., G. Halász, J. Looney, P. Santiago & C. Shewbridge (2011) OECD Review of Evaluation and Assessment in Education Sweden, OECD.
  • OECD (2002) Education at a Glance, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Devel-opment.
  • Ozga, J. (2009) Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24 (2): 149–162.
  • Perryman, J. (2006) Panoptic performativity & school disciplinary regimes. Journal of Education Policy, 21 (2): 147–161.
  • Ramboll (2011) Country Background Report for Denmark, for OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes, Ramboll management, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Regeringen (2010): Danmark 2020 Viden > uwkst > velstand > velfxrd, Kobenhavn: Statsministeriet
  • Rinne, R., Kivirauma, J. and Simola, H. (2002) Shoots of revisionist education policy or just slow readjustment? The Finnish case of educational reconstruction, Journal of Education Policy, 17 (6): 643–658.
  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
  • Rönnberg, L. (2011) Exploring the intersection of marketisation and central state control through Swedish national school inspection. Education Inquiry, 2 (4), 695–713.
  • Segerholm, C. (2009) “We are doing well on QAE": The case of Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 24 (2): 195–209.
  • Shewbridge, C., Jang, E., Matthews, P. & Santiago, P. (2011) OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education, Denmark, OECD.
  • Simola, H., Rinne, R. & Kivirauma, J. (2002) Abdication of the education state or just shiffing responsibilities? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46 (3), 247–264.
  • Simola, H. et al. (2009) Quality assurance and evaluation (QAE) in Finnish compulsory schooling: A national model or just unintended effects of radical decentralisation? Journal of Education Policy, 24 (2): 163-178.
  • Solhaug, T. (2011) New public management in educational reform in Norway. Policy Futures in Education, 9 (2): 267–279.
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11) 1991–2006.
  • Soderberg, S., Wiren, E. and Ramstedt, K. (2004) The Role of Evaluation, Assessment and In-spection in Swedish Educational Policy, Berlin: Sixth Conference of the European Evaluation Society (EES) “Governance, Democracy and Evaluation”, 30 September-2 October.
  • Telhaug, A., Oftedal, M., Odd, A. and Aasen, P. (2006) The Nordic model in education: Educa-tion as part of the political system in the last 50 years, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50 (3): 245-283.
  • Tjeldvoll, A. (ed.) (1998) Education and the Scandinavian Welfare State in the Year 2000: Equal-ity, Policy, and Reform, New York: Garland.
  • Tolofari, S. (2005) New public management and education. Policy Futures in Education, 3 (1): 75–89.