Standards-Based Accountability in the United States:

References

• Archbald, D.A. (1998) The reviews of state content standards in English language arts and math-ematics: A summary and review of their methods and findings and implications for future standards development (Report ED-98-P0-038).Washington DC: National Education Goals Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E.L., Barton, P.E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H.F., Linn, R.L., et al. (2010) Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers [Briefing Paper No. 278]. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005) Below the bubble: ‘Educational Triage’ and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal 42 (2) 231–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. (1979) Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning 2, 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. & Loeb, S. (2002) Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24,305–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center on Education Policy (2006) From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Center on Education Policy (2007) Answering the question that matters most: Has student achievement increased since No Child Left Behind? Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Center on Education Policy (2008) Has student achievement increased since 2002? State test score trends through 2006-07. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clune, W.H. (2001) Towards a theory of standards-based reform: The case of nine NSF state-wide systematic initiatives. In S.H. Fuhrman (Ed.) From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-based Reform in the States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C.E., & Turner, E.O. (2011) Research on data use: A framework and analysis measure-ment. Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9 (4), 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, J., Dahlin, M., Adkins, D., & Kingsbury, G.G. (2007) The Proficiency Illusion. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J.B. (2007) Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education 80, 285-313.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service (2011) Coming Tog ether to Raise Achievement: New Assessments for the Common Core State Standards. Princeton, NJ: Center for K-12 Assessment & Perfor-mance Management. Retrieved 22 Sept. 2011 from http://www.ki2center.orgirsc/pdf/Assess-mentsfortheCommonCoreStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C.E., Julian, L., & Petrilli, M.J. (2006) The State of State Standards 2006. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W.A., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998) Performance-based assessments and in-structional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 20 (2), 95–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glidden, H. (2008) Common ground: Clear, specific content holds teaching, texts, and tests to-gether. American Educator Spring, 13-19.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, M.E. (June 2007) Standards-based Reform: Lessons from the Past, Directions for the Future. Paper presented at the Conference on the Uses of History to Inform and Improve Edu-cation Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R.K., Jaeger R.M., Koretz D., Linn, Millman J., and Phillips (1995) Review of the Measurement Quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information Systems, 1991-1994. A report prepared for the Office of Education Accountability, Kentucky General Assem-bly. Frankfort, Ky.: Office of Education Accountability.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.S. (2003) Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education 27, 25–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B.M., Marsh, J., McCombs, J.S., Robyn, A., Russell, J., Naftel, S., & Bar-ney, H. (2007) Implementing Standards-based Accountability under No Child Left Behind Responses of Superintendents, Principals, and Teachers in Three States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B.M., Russell, J.L., Marsh, J.A., & Miles, J. (2008) Accountability and teaching practices: School-level actions and teacher responses. In B. Fuller, M.K. Henne, & E. Hannum (Eds.) Strong State, Weak Schools: The Benefits and Dilemmas of Centralized Accountability (Research in the Sociology of Education, Vol. 16). St. Louis, MO: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B.M., & Yuan, K. (2009) Standards-based Reform in the United States: History, Research, and Future Directions. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2005) Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Public Analysis and Management 24, 297–327.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B.A. (2005) Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics 89, 761–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B.A. (2007) Test-based Accountability and Student Achievement: An Investigation of Dif-ferential Performance on NAEP and State Assessments (Working Paper No. 12817). Cam-bridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2005) Alignment, high stakes, and the inflation of test scores. In J. Herman and E. Haertel (Eds.) Uses and Misuses of Data in Accountability Testing. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Vol. 104, Part 2. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D.M. (2008) Measuring up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D., and Barron, S. I. (1998) The Validity of Gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). MR-1o14-EDU, Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D.M., & Hamilton, L.S. (2006) Testing for accountability in K-12. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.) Educational Measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S., Parke, C.S., & Stone, C.A. (2002) The impact of a state performance-based assessment and accountability program on mathematics instruction and student learning: Evidence from survey data and school performance. Educational Assessment 8, 279–315.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, P.A., Snow, D., Martin-Glenn, M., Van Buhler, R.J., & Snow-Renner, R. (2005) The Influence of Standards on K-12 Teaching and Student Learning: A Research Syn-thesis. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R.L. (2003) Performance standards: Utility for different uses of assessments. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11, 31. Retrieved 20 October 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/viin31/
   Google Scholar
• Massell, D. (1994) Achieving consensus: Setting the agenda for state curriculum reform. In R.F. Elmore & S.H. Fuhrman (Eds.) The Governance of Curriculum: 1994 Yearbook of the Associa-tion for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervi-sion and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D.M., & Hamilton, L.S. (2003) Evaluating Value Added Models for Teacher Accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Education Standards and Testing (1992) Raising Standards for American Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2006) Systems for State Science Assessment. Committee on test De-sign for K-12 Science Achievement. M.R. Wilson and M.W. Bertenthal (eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2011) Incentives and Test-based Accountability in Public Education. Committee on Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Public Education, M. Hout and S.W. Elliott (Eds.) Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., S. Konstantopoulos, and L.V. Hedges (2004) How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26 (3) 237–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009) Comparing Countries' and Economies' Performance. Retrieved 22 Sept 2011 from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/datao-ecd/54/12/46643496.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21” Century Skills (2008) 21st Century Skills, Education, and Competitiveness: A Resource and Policy Guide. Retrieved 22 Sept 2011 from http://www.2istcenturyskills.org/documents/21stcenturyskillseducationandcompetitivenessguide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pedulla, J.J., Abrams, L.M., Madaus, G.F., Russell, M.K, Ramos, MA., & Miao, J. (2003) Perceived Effects of State-Mandated Testing Programs on Teaching and Learning: Findings From a National Survey of Teachers. Boston, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W.J. (1987) The merits of measurement-driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappan 68,679–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. (1994) National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education 102,421–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, LB., & Resnick, D.P. (1992) Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B.R. Gifford & M.C. O'Connor (Eds.) Changing Assessment: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement, and Instruction. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S.G., E. Hanushek, and Kain J.F. (2005) Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica 73 (2) 417–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, R., Slattery, J.B., Vranek, J. L, & Resnick, LB. (2002) Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing (CSE Technical Report 566). Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evalu-ation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., Jacobsen, R., & Wilder, T. (2006) “Proficiency for all"—An oxymoron. Paper prepared for the Symposium, “Examining America's Commitment to Closing Achievement Gaps: NCLB and Its Alternatives,” sponsored by the Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Co-lumbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. Hamilton, LS., Stecher, B.M., & Steele, J.L. (2011) Expanded Measures of School Per-formance. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.S., & O'Day, J. (1991) Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.) The Politics of Curriculum and Testing: The 1990 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B.M. (2002) Consequences of large-scale high-stakes testing on school and classroom prac-tice. In LS. Hamilton, B.M. Stecher & S.P. Klein (Eds.) Making Sense of Test-Based Account-ability in Education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B.M., Camm, F., Damberg, C.L., Hamilton, L.S., Mullen, KJ., Nelson, C., Sorenson, P., Wachs, M., Yoh, A., & Zellman, G.L. (2010) Toward a Culture of Consequences: Performance-based Accountability Systems for Public Services. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B.M., Epstein, S., Hamilton, L.S., Marsh, J.A., Robyn, A., McCombs, J.S., Russell, J.L., & Naftel, S. (2008) Pain and Gain: Implementing No Child Left Behind in California, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, 2004 to 2006. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, C. (2009) Cities in Crisis, 2009: Closing the Graduation Gap. Retrieved 22 Sept 2011 from http://www.edweek.org/media/citiesincrisis2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S Department of Education (2007) Modified Academic Achievement Standards: Non-regulatory Guidance. Retrieved 8 February 2012 from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/saa.html
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S.W., & Wixson, K.K. (2001) Inside English/language arts standards: What's in a grade? Reading Research Quarterly 36, 202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.M., & Floden, R.E. (2001) Hedging bets: Standards-based reform in classrooms. In S.H. Fuhrman (Ed.) From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar