1,359
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Assessment, evaluation and quality assurance: Implications for integrity in reporting academic achievement in higher education

Pages 201-216 | Received 09 Jul 2013, Accepted 09 Jul 2013, Published online: 01 Jun 2012

References

  • Benjamin, R. (2009) The CLA: What It Is Today, What It Will Be Tomorrow. New York: Council for Aid to Education.
  • Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press/Mc Graw-Hill Education.
  • Bostock, S.J. (1998) Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology 29, 225–240.
  • Braskamp, L.A., Ory, J.C. and Pieper, D.M. (1981) Student written comments: Dimensions of in-structional quality. Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 65–70.
  • Brown, R. (2010) The current brouhaha about standards in England. Quality in Higher Education 16, 129–137.
  • Cowan, R., David, P. and Foray, D. (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 211–253.
  • Dewey, J. (1939) Theory of Valuation. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol.2, No.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Elton, L. (1998) Dimensions of excellence in university teaching. International Journal for Aca-demic Development 3, 3–11.
  • Elton, L. (2004) A challenge to established assessment practice. Higher Education Quarterly 58, 43–62.
  • Enders, J. and Boer, H. (2009) The mission impossible of the European university: Institution-al confusion and institutional diversity. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maas-sen (eds.), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • European Commission. (2009) ECTS Users' Guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Ford, M.E. (1992) Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  • Guskey, T.R. and Bailey, J.M. (2001) Developing Grading and Reporting Systems for Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Hill, D. (2010) A contentious triangle: Grading and academic freedom in the academy. Higher Education Quarterly 65, 3–11.
  • Hunt, L.H. (ed.). (2008) Grade Inflation: Academic Standards in Higher Education. New York: SITNY Press.
  • Jones, A. (2009) Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education 34, 85–100.
  • Kehm, B. and Teichler, U. (2006) Which direction for bachelor and master programmes? A stock-taking of the Bologna process. Tertiary Education and Management 12, 269–282.
  • Oppenheim, A.N., Jahoda, M. and James, R.L. (1967) Assumptions underlying the use of univer-sity examinations. Higher Education Quarterly 21, 341–351.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010) AHELO: Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes. OECD: Newsletter — December 2010.
  • Ramsden, P. (1991) A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 16, 129–150
  • Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge-Falmer
  • Ryan, K.E. (ed.). (2000) Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education: A Vision for the Future (New Directions for Teaching and Learning Series, Vol. 83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sadler, D.R. (1985) The origins and functions of evaluative criteria. Educational Theory 35, 285–297.
  • Sadler, D.R. (1987) Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Word Review of Edu-cation 13, 191–209.
  • Sadler, D.R. (2005) Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30, 175–194.
  • Sadler, D.R. (2009a) Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34, 159–179.
  • Sadler, D.R. (2009b) Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education 34, 807–826.
  • Sadler, D.R. (2010) Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. As-sessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35, 727–743.
  • Sadler, D.R. (2011) Academic freedom, achievement standards and professional identity. Quality in Higher Education 17, 103–118.
  • Scriven, M. (1967) The methodology of evaluation. In R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagne and M. Scriven (eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. (AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Eval-uation, Vol. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Sherman, T.M., Armistead, L.P., Fowler, F., Barksdale, M.A. and Reif, G. (1987) The quest for ex-cellence in university teaching. Journal of Higher Education 58, 66–84.
  • Skelton, A. (2005) Understanding Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Towards a Critical Approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Stufflebeam, D.L., Foley, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R.L., Merriman, H.O. and Provus, M.M. (1971) Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Phi Delta Kappa National Study Committee on Evaluation. Itasca, Illinois: Peacock.
  • Westerheijden, D.F., Stensaker, B. and Rosa, M.J. (eds.). (2007) Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation (Higher Education Dy-namics Series, Vol. 20). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Whitley, B.E. Jr. and Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002) Academic Dishonesty: An Educator's Guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.