‘Whenever I put a black jacket on, I get dandruff ’

References

• Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. 3: Speech Acts.
   Google Scholar
• Hazen, M.D. (1995) Interpersonal argument: dimensions of the said and unsaid. In Proceedings of the 3r1 International Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 1, pp. 207-221. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson, K. (1998) Retorik eller konsten alt övertyga. Stockholm: Norstedts förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, J. (2004) Retorikk i vat- lid. Oslo: Spartacus forlag AS.
   Google Scholar
• Kuypers, J. (2009) Rhetorical Criticism. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1991) Semantics (1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liljestrand, B. (1983) Sprák i text. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Melanchthon, P. (2001) Elementa rhetorices (transl. Volkhard Wels). Berlin: Weidler.
   Google Scholar
• Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (2000). Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (2003) Dirven, R. & Porings, R. (eds.). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Musson, G. & Tietze, S. (2004) Places and spaces: The role of metonymy in organizational talk. Journal of Management Studies 41 (8), 1301–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordkvelle, Y. (2002) FORUM: Didaldikk. Fra retorikk til kjøkkenlatin. Nordisk Pedagogik, 3,130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (1999) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Perme, L. (2000) Prolog. Malmo: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Quintilian (1961-1966) The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian (Butler, H.E. transl.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, J. (2000) Retoriken och retorikerna. Rhetorica Scandinavica 16, 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seto, K. (1999) Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rhetorica Scandinavica, (2006) “Retorikens didaldik” no 38, (ed. Anders Sigrell).
   Google Scholar
• Ryden, H. et al. (1995) Sprdkorientering for gymnasieskolan. Stockholm: Bokffirlaget Natur och Kukur.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. (2003). Progymnasmata, pragmadialectics and pedagogy. Proceedings of the 5th Con-ference on Argumentation. Sic Sat 2003, pp. 965–969.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. (2003) Progymnasmata — an answer for today's rhetorical pedagogy? Academic Exchange Quarterly, Spring, 112–117.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. (2007) The normativity of the progymnasmata exercises. ISSA-proceedings 2006, van Eemeren F. et al. (eds.). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 1285–1291.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. & Church, A. (2005) Cum poterit — rhetorical exercises for transition students Scandinavian Journal for Educational Research 49 (5), 543-557.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. (2011a) All ffireläsa är all lyssna. Om retorik som konsten all lyssna. I: Forelesning ens kunst Skodvin, Flyum, Knudsen & Simonsen (red.). Oslo: Unipub 2011 pp. 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrell, A. (2011b) The ethical entailment of our language choices. In Scandinavian Studies in Rhetoric. Kjeldsen, J. & Grue, J. (eds.). Qdäkra: Retorikffirlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2008) Manoeuvring strategically with metonymy in the confrontation and argumentation stages of a discussion. In F.H. van Eemeren, D. Williams and I. Zagar (eds.), Understanding Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rosenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Sugeno, T. (1996) Metonymy as the primary trope. Poetica 46,101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, G. (1991) The New Science of Giambattista Vico (T.G. Bergin & M.H. Fisch (transl.). New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. (2009) Rhetorical Criticism. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenstrom, R. (2012) Metaforer i naturvetenskapliga ämnen. http://www.mv.helsinki.fi/wadenstr/texter/metaforer.htm
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (1984) The enthymeme in perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltereit, R. (1999) Grammatical constraints on metonymy: On the role of the direct object. In Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, E. (2009). Diskutera! Aktuella frOg or. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar