1,754
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Section

Evaluation systems in a crowded policy space: Implications for local school governance

, &
Article: 30202 | Published online: 01 Sep 2016

References

  • Behn R. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. 2001; Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
  • Bergh A. Why quality in education – and what quality? A linguistic analysis of the concept of quality in Swedish government texts. Education Inquiry. 2011; 2(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 709–723.
  • Blanchenay P., Burns T., Köster F. Shifting Responsibilities: 20 Years of Education Devolution in Sweden. 2014; Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD, EDU Working Paper No. 104.
  • Bovens M. Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics. 2010; 33(5Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 946–967.
  • Carvalho L. The fabrications and travels of a knowledge-policy instrument. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 172–188.
  • Dahler-Larsen P. Evaluation as a situational or universal good? Why evaluability assessment for evaluation systems is a good idea, what it might look in practice, and why it is fashionable. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 29–46.
  • Drery D. Policy by the way: when policy is incidental to making other policies. Journal of Public Policy. 1998; 18(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 163–176.
  • Ehren M. C. M., Altrichter H., McNamara G., O'Hara J. Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools: describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries, Educational Assessment. Evaluation and Accountability. 2013; 25(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 3–43.
  • Eklöf H., Andersson E., Wikström C. The concept of accountability in education: does the Swedish school system apply?. CADMO. 2009; 2: 55–66.
  • Fox J. A. The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice. 2007; 17(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 663–671.
  • Grek S. What PISA knows and can do: studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 243–254.
  • Grundmann R., Stehr N. The power of scientific knowledge: from research to public policy. 2012; Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gustafsson J.-E., Lander R., Myrberg E. Inspections of Swedish schools: a critical reflection on intended effects, causal mechanisms and methods. Education Inquiry. 2014; 5(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 461–479.
  • Gustafsson J.-E., Cliffordson C., Erickson G. Likvärdig kunskapsbedömning i och av den svenska skolan – problem och möjligheter [Equity in and testing in and of the Swedish school – problems and opportunities]. 2014b; Stockholm: SNS förlag.
  • Hall P. Sandberg Å;. NPM in Sweden: the risky balance between bureaucracy and politics. Nordic Lights: Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. 2013; Stockholm: SNS förlag. 406–419.
  • Hanberger A. Framework for exploring the interplay of governance and evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2013; 16(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 9–28.
  • Hanberger A. What PISA intends to and can possibly achieve: a critical programme theory analysis. European Educational Research Journal. 2014; 13(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 167–180.
  • Hanberger A. Evaluation in local school governance: a framework for analysis. 2016. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 29914, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29914.
  • Hanberger A., Lindgren L., Lundström U. Navigating the evaluation web: evaluation in Swedish local school governance. Education Inquiry. 2016; 7(3): 29913, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29913.
  • Hansen M., Lander R. Om statens verktyg för skoljämförelser. Vem vill dansa SALSA? [The government's instrument for school comparisons. Who will dance the SALSA?]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige. 2009; 14(1): 1–21.
  • Hansson F., Hägnemark G. Kvalitets- och effektivitetsanalyser inom rättsväsendet och skolområdet [Analyses of quality and effectiveness in the judicial and school systems]. 2012; Stockholm: Swedeval Utvärdering.
  • Hudson C. Governing the governance of education: the states strikes back?. European Educational Research Journal. 2007; 6(3Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 266–282.
  • Hult A., Segerholm C. Juridification as governing in education: the Swedish Schools Inspectorate as an example. (manuscript); Umeå, Sweden: Department of Education, Umeå University.
  • Jarl M., Rönnberg L. Skolpolitik. Från riksdagshus till klassrum [Education politics. From parliament to classroom]. 2015; Stockholm: Liber.
  • Keane J. Monitory democracy. Paper prepared for the ESRC seminar series, “Emergent Publics”. 2008; Milton Keynes: The Open University. 13–14 March 2008.
  • Lawn M., Grek S. Europeanizing education: governing a new policy space. 2012; Providence, RI: Symposium Books.
  • Leeuw F., Furubo J.-E. Evaluation systems: what are they and why study them?. Evaluation. 2008; 14(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 157–170.
  • Levin B. Governments and education reform: some lessons from the last 50 years. Journal of Education Policy. 2010; 25(6Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 739–747.
  • Lindgren J., Hult A., Segerholm C., Rönnberg L. Mediating school inspection: key dimensions and keywords in agency text production 2003–2010. Education Inquiry. 2012; 3(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 569–590.
  • Lindgren L. Nya utvärderingsmonstret. Kvalitetsmätning i den offentliga sektorn. [The new evaluation monster. Performance measurement in the public sector]. 2014; Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Lindgren L., Hanberger A. Overcrowding on the Swedish education evaluation arena: consequences for accountability. 2014. Paper presented at 11th EES Biennial Conference, Dublin, 1–3 October 2014.
  • Lingard B. Policy as numbers: accounting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher. 2011; 38(4Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 355–382.
  • Lundahl L. A matter of self-governance and control: the reconstruction of Swedish education policy, 1980–2003. European Education. 2005; 37(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 10–25.
  • Lundström U. Systematic quality work in Swedish Schools. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 2015; 19(1Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 23–43.
  • Majone G. Evidence, argument & persuasion in the policy process. 1989; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Mangez E., Hilgers M. The field of knowledge and the policy field in education: PISA and the production of knowledge for policy. European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11(2Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 189–205.
  • Montin S. Från tilltrobaserad till misstroendebaserad styrning. Relationen mellan stat och kommun och styrning av äldreomsorg [From governance by trust to governance by distrust. The relation between central and local government in the field of eldercare]. Nordisk Administrativ Tidskrift. 2015; 1(92Special Issue: The Role of Evaluation in Local School Governance in Sweden): 58–75.
  • OECD. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Sweden. 2011; Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. PISA 2012 results: what students know and can do: student performance in mathematics, reading and science. 2014; Paris: OECD Publishing. Vol. I, revised ed.
  • OECD. Improving schools in Sweden: an OECD perspective. 2015; Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public management reform: a comparative analysis. 2011; Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd ed.
  • Proposition 2012/13:195. Minskade krav på dokumentation i skolan [Reduced demands for documentation in schools].
  • Rist R., Stame N. From studies to streams: managing evaluative systems. 2006; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Rizvi F., Lingard B. Globalizing education policy. 2010; Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • SALAR. Information om enkät Elevernas syn på skolan [Information about the questionnaire “Pupils’ view of schools”]. 2010. Available online at http://skl.se/skolakulturfritid/skolaforskola/sklssatsningarutvecklaskolan/enkatelevernassynpaskolan/informationenkatfragor.5321.html, accessed 2015-08-02.
  • SALAR. Öppna jämförelser – Grundskola 2015. Tema systematiskt kvalitetsarbete med SKL:s handbook [Open comparisons – compulsory school 2015. Using SALAR's manual for systematic quality work]. 2015; Stockholm: Swedish Association for Local Authorities and Regions.
  • Sandén J. Hur lärarnas admininstrativa arbete kan påverka kvaliteten i skolan [How teachers’ administrative work can affect school quality]. 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg University, School of Public Administration.
  • Schillemans T., Bovens M. Dubnick M. J., Frederickson H. G. The challenge of multiple accountability: does redundancy lead to overload?. Accountable Governance: Problems and Promises. 2011; Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe. 3–21.
  • SFS 2010:800. Skollagen [The education act].
  • SFS 2011:185. Skolförordning [The education ordinance].
  • Skolinspektionen. Årsredovisning 2014 [Annual report 2014]. 2015a; Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
  • Skolinspektionen. Huvudmannens styrning av grundskolan [The school provider's governing of comprehensive school]. 2015b; Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
  • Skolinspektionen. 2015c. About the Swedish Schools Inspectorate. Available online at http://www.skolinspektionen.se/en/About-Skolinspektionen/About-the-Swedish-Schools-Inspectorate/, accessed 2015-04-04.
  • Skolinspektionen. Skolenkäten [The school survey]. 2015d. Available online at http://www.skolinspektionen.se/skolenkaten, accessed 2015-04-04..
  • Skolverket. Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisuretime centre. 2011; Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • Skolverket. Systematiskt kvalitetsarbete för skolväsendet. Skolverkets allmänna råd med kommentarer [Systematic quality work for schools. General advice with comments]. 2012; Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Skolverket. Municipal responsibility in practice: a qualitative study. 2013; Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Skolverket. Skolverkets årsredovisning 2014. [Skolverket annual report, 2014]. 2015a. Available online at http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3387, accessed 2015-06-08.
  • Skolverket. SIRIS kvalitet och resultat i skolan [SIRIS quality and effectiveness in school]. 2015b. Available online at http://siris.skolverket.se/siris/f?p=Siris:1:0, accessed 2015-06-06.
  • SOU 2013:30. Det tar tid – om effekter av skolpolitiska reformer [It takes time – on the impact of school reforms]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • SOU 2014:5. Staten får inte abdikera – om kommunalisering [The government cannot abdicate – on decentralisation]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • SOU 2014:12. Utvärdera för utveckling – om utveckling av skolpolitiska reformer [Evaluation for development – on the development of educational reforms]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
  • Svenskt Näringsliv. Kvalitetsrekommendation för vård, skola och omsorg [Quality recommendations for health care, school and social work]. 2013; Stockholm: Svenskt Näringsliv. Expertgruppen för kvalitet i välfärden.
  • Wildawsky A. Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. 1979; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.