Evaluating youth-friendly health services: young people's perspectives from a simulated client study in urban South Africa

References

• World Health Organisation. Adolescent friendly health services: an agenda for change. 2002; Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. International conference on population and development (ICPD) (Cairo 1994) – programme of action. 1995; New York: UNFPA.
   Google Scholar
• The African Union Commission. Universal access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: Maputo Plan of Action for the operationalization of the continental policy framework for sexual and reproductive health rights 2007–2010. 2006; Addis Ababa: African Union Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick MD, Catalano RF, Sawyer SM, Viner R, Patton GC. Seizing the opportunities of adolescent health. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1564–7. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Summary of the declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS. 2002; Geneva: UNAIDS.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Tetteh K, Pettifor A, Moleko W. Working with public-sector clinics to provide adolescent-friendly services in South Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2001; 9: 160–9. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Ashton J, Dickson K, Pleaner M. The evolution of the national adolescent friendly clinic initiative in South Africa. 2009; Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson KE, Ashton J, Smith J-M. Does setting adolescent-friendly standards improve the quality of care in clinics? Evidence from South Africa. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 80–9. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• loveLife. 2004 report on activities and progress. 2004; Cape Town: The New loveLife Trust.
   Google Scholar
• loveLife. HIV prevention in the Melmoth area, KwaZulu-Natal: an assessment of effects associated with loveLife's intervention. 2007; Sandton, Johannesburg: The New loveLife Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews C, Guttmacher S, Fisher A, Mtshizana Y, Nelson T, McCarthy J, etal. The quality of HIV testing services for adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa: do adolescent-friendly services make a difference?. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 44: 188–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• loveLife. Annual monitoring report. 2008; Sandton, Johannesburg: The New loveLife Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Geary RS, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kahn K, Tollman S, Norris SA. Provision of youth friendly services in rural South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 259. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Schuler SR, McIntosh EN, Goldstein MC, Pande BR. Barriers to effective family planning in Nepal. Stud Fam Plann. 1985; 16: 260–70. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Larke N, Cleophas-Mazige B, Plummer ML, Obasi AIN, Rwakatare M, Todd J, etal. Impact of the MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual and reproductive health interventions on use of health services by young people in rural Tanzania: results of a cluster randomized trial. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47: 512–22. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Nalwadda G, Tunmwesigye NM, Faxelid E, Byamugisha J, Mirembe F. Quality of care in contraceptive services provided to young people in two Ugandan districts: a simulated client study. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e27908. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Renju J, Andrew B, Kishamawe C, Kato C, Changalucha J, Obasi A. A process evaluation of the scale up of a youth friendly health services initiative in northern Tanzania. J Int AIDS Soc. 2010; 13: 32. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Madden JM, Quick JD, Ross-Degnan D, Kalfe KK. Undercover careseekers: simulated clients in the study of health provider behaviour in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 45: 1465–82. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Rowe AK, Onikpo F, Lama M, Deming MS. Evaluating health worker performance in Benin using the simulated client method with real children. Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 95. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Davey-Smith G, Mertens T. What's said and what's done: the reality of sexually transmitted disease consultations. Public Health. 2004; 118: 96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington D, Schuler SR. The simulated client method: evaluating client-provider interactions in family planning clinics. Stud Fam Plann. 1993; 24: 187–93. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Richter L, Norris S, de Wet T. Transition from birth to ten to twenty: the South African cohort reaches 13 years of age. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004; 18: 290–301. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Richter L, Norris S, Pettifor J, Yach D, Cameron N. Cohort Profile: Mandela's children: the 1990 birth to twenty study in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36: 504–11. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health Republic of South Africa. National contraception and fertility planning policy and service delivery guidelines. 2012; Pretoria: Department of Health Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health Republic of South Africa. National contraception clinical guidelines. 2012; Pretoria: Department of Health Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• STATA Corp. STATA 11. College Station. 2011
   Google Scholar
• Bruce J. Elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990; 21: 61–91. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Langhaug LF, Cowan FM, Nyamurera T, Power RM, The Regai Dzive Shiri Study Group. Improving young people's access to reproductive health care in rural Zimbabwe. AIDS Care. 2003; 15: 147–57. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Erulkar AS, Onoka CJ, Phiri A. What is youth-friendly? Adolescents’ preferences for reproductive health services in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Afr J Reprod Health. 2005; 9: 51–8. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Global consultation on adolescent friendly health services. A consensus statement. 2001; Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Panday S, Makiwane M, Ranchod C, Letsoalo T. Teenage pregnancy in South Africa: with a specific focus on school-going learners. 2009; Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2012. 2012; Geneva: UNAIDS.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of South Africa. Children's Act. Cape Town: 2006 Contract No. 28944.
   Google Scholar
• Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Pillay-van-Wyk V, etal. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communication survey 2008: a turning tide among teenagers?. 2009; Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tylee A, Haller DM, Graham T, Churchill R, Sanci LA. Adolescent Health 6: youth-friendly primary-care services: how are we doing and what more needs to be done?. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1565–73. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56: 119–27. [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Saewyc EM. What about the boys? The importance of including boys and young men in sexual and reproductive health research. J Adolesc Health. 2012; 51: 1–2. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health Republic of South Africa. National adolescent and youth friendly health services strategy 2012. 2012; Pretoria: Department of Health Republic of South Africa.
   Google Scholar