Beliefs, perceptions and health-seeking behaviours in relation to cervical cancer: a qualitative study among women in Uganda following completion of an HPV vaccination campaign

References

• Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Uganda Demographic and Health survey. 2011; Statistics. Calverton, MD: ICF International; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, African Population and Health Research Center, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Prevention of cervical cancer through screening using Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and treatment with cryotherapy. A demonstration project in six African countries: Malawi, Madagascar, Nigeria, Uganda, The United republic of Tanzania and Zambia. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Contract No.: ISBN 978 92 41 503860. 2012
   Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Nambooze S, Wabwire-Mangen F, Wabinga HR. Changing cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda 1991–2006. Int J Cancer. 2010; 126: 1187–95.
   Google Scholar
• Banura C, Sandin S, van Doorn LJ, Quint W, Kleter B, Wabwire-Mangen F, etal. Type-specific incidence, clearance and predictors of cervical human papillomavirus infections (HPV) among young women: a prospective study in Uganda. Infect Agent Cancer. 2010; 5: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Daley E, Perrin K, Vamos C, Hernandez N, Anstey E, Baker E, etal. Confusion about Pap smears: lack of knowledge among high-risk women. J Women's Health. 2013; 22: 67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivistik A, Lang K, Baili P, Anttila A, Veerus P. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, screening and reasons for non-participation in cervical cancer screening programme in Estonia. BMC Women's Health. 2011; 11: 43.
   Google Scholar
• Stein K, Lewendon G, Jenkins R, Davis C. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods. J Med Screen. 2005; 12: 185–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, etal. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 677–86.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzick J, Mayrand MH, Ronco G, Snijders P, Wardle J. Chapter 10: new dimensions in cervical cancer screening. Vaccine. 2006; 24(Suppl 3): 90–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardahan M, Temel AB. Visual inspection with acetic acid in cervical cancer screening. Cancer Nurs. 2011; 34: 158–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sahasrabuddhe VV, Parham GP, Mwanahamuntu MH, Vermund SH. Cervical cancer prevention in low- and middle-income countries: feasible, affordable, essential. Cancer Prev Res. 2012; 5: 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham A, Bishop A, Coffey P, Winkler J, Bradley J, Dzuba I, etal. Factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer prevention services in low-resource settings. Salud Publica Mex. 2003; 45(Suppl 3):S408–16.
   Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. The scope of health education and health behavior. Health behavior and health education theory, research, and Practice. 2008; San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 4–38. 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Paul P, Winkler JL, Bartolini RM, Penny ME, Huong TT, Nga le T, etal. Screen-and-treat approach to cervical cancer prevention using visual inspection with acetic acid and cryotherapy: experiences, perceptions, and beliefs from demonstration projects in Peru, Uganda, and Vietnam. Oncologist. 2013; 18: 1278–84.
   Google Scholar
• PATH. Lessons learned from a pilot program in Uganda. 2010; Kampala, Uganda: PATH.
   Google Scholar
• Mwaka AD, Okello ES, Kiguli J, Rutebemberwa E. Understanding cervical cancer: an exploration of lay perceptions, beliefs and knowledge about cervical cancer among the Acholi in northern Uganda. BMC Women's Health. 2014; 14: 84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-84 [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Mwaka AD, Okello ES, Orach CG. Barriers to biomedical care and use of traditional medicines for treatment of cervical cancer: an exploratory qualitative study in northern Uganda. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015; 24: 503–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12211.
   Google Scholar
• Walter FM, Mwaka AD, Neal RD. Achieving earlier diagnosis of symptomatic cervical cancer. Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64: 495–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681649 [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Mwaka AD, Okello ES, Wabinga H, Walter FM. Symptomatic presentation with cervical cancer in Uganda: a qualitative study assessing the pathways to diagnosis in a low-income country. BMC Women's Health. 2015; 15: 15. 10.1186/s12905-015-0167-4 [PubMed Abstract] [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Champion Victoria L, Skinner Celette S.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. The Health Belief Model. Health behavior and health education theory, research and practice. 2008; San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. 46–65. 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Arguto I, Bishop A, Sanchez G, Betancourt Z, Robles S. Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med. 2004; 39: 91–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redwood-Campbell L, Fowler N, Laryea S, Howard M, Kaczorowski J. ‘Before you teach me, I cannot know’: immigrant women's barriers and enablers with regard to cervical cancer screening among different ethnolinguistic groups in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2011; 102: 230–4. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• John Creswell V, Knight H. Lauren, Quesenbery SK, Marilyn P. Scott. Qualitative procedures. 2008; Thousand Oaks, CA: Power Scott Merilyn. 173–202.. 3rd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Halcomb EJ, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson PM. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 1000–11.
   Google Scholar
• Forman J, Creswell JW, Damschroder L, Kowalski CP, Krein SL. Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research. Am J Infect Contr. 2008; 36: 764–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM. Focus group discussions- when to use focused groups. 2013; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. 2008; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mupepi SC, Sampselle CM, Johnson TRB. Knowledge, attitudes, and demographic factors influencing cervical cancer screening behavior of Zimbabwean women. J Women's Health. 2011; 20: 943–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper M. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening. Nurs Stand. 2011; 25: 41–6.
   Google Scholar
• Spadea T, Bellini S, Kunst A, Stirbu I, Costa G. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review. Prev Med. 2010; 50: 159–64.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah F, Su TT. Enhancement of the cervical cancer screening program in Malaysia: a qualitative study. J Cancer Prev. 2010; 11: 1359–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EE, Fogg L, Menon U. Knowledge and beliefs related to cervical cancer and screening among Korean American women. West J Nurs Res. 2008; 30: 960–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sherris J, Wittet S, Kleine A, Sellors J, Luciani S, Sankaranarayanan R, etal. Evidence-based, alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in low-resource settings. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009; 35: 147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman AL, Shepeard H. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of the general public regarding HPV: findings from CDC focus group research and implications for practice. Health Educ Behav. 2007; 34: 471–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fort VK, Makin MS, Siegler AJ, Ault K, Rochat R. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Mulanje, Malawi: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011; 5: 125–31.
   Google Scholar
• Agurto I, Bishop A, Sanchez G, Betancourt Z, Robles S. Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med. 2004; 39: 91–8.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan JR, Viswanath K.K Glantz, et al. Communication theory and health behavior change. The media studies framework. Health behavior and health education theory, research, and practice. 2008; San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 364–87. 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Natan M, Adir O. Screening for cervical cancer among Israeli lesbian women. Int Nurs Rev. 2009; 56: 433–41.
   Google Scholar
• Logan L, McIlfatrick S. Exploring women's knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011; 20: 720–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, De Vito C, Bahirathan L, Carol A, Carroll JC, Cotterchio M, etal. What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates?. A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 111.
   Google Scholar
• Sabates R, Feinstein L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 2998–3010.
   Google Scholar
• Mutyaba T, Mmiro FA, Weiderpass E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda. BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Ibekwe CM, Hoque ME, Ntuli-Ngcobo B. Perceived benefits of cervical cancer screening among women attending Mahalapye District Hospital, Botswana. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010; 11: 1021–7. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar