A political economy of oral health services in Nunavut

References

• Archibald L. and Grey R. Evaluation of Models of Health Care Delivery in Inuit Regions. Ottawa: Health Canada 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot I. Statistics are Staggering - The fuel of the North is not gas, diesel or kerosene: it’s soda popl Northern News Service. October 13 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rae E, Thompson G, Moffatt M, Young T, O’Neil J. Dental health in Keewatin region adults.Arctic Med Res 1994; 53 (2): 754–756.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller P,Thompson G, Moffatt M,Young T, O’Neil J, Schwartz A. Periodontal health of Keewatin, Canada children and adults.Arctic Med Res 1994; 53 (2): 761–764.
   Google Scholar
• Galan D, Odium 0, Grymonpre R, Brecx M. Medical and dental status of a culture in transition:The case of the Inuit elderly of Canada. Gerodont 1993;10 (1): 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jock R.A call to action. J Can DentAssoc 1993;59(2): 99.
   Google Scholar
• Locker D. and Matear D. Oral disorders, systemic health, well-being and the quality of life. Community Health Services Research Unit, University ofToronto: Toronto 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Slade GD. Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes—measuring health status and quality of life.” Comm Dent Health 2000; 15(l):3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Leao A. and Sheiham A. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (7): 1408–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gift HC, Reisine ST, Larach DC.The social impact of dental problems and visits.Am J Public Health 1992; 82 (12): 1663–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisine ST.The effects of pain and oral health on the quality of life. Comm Dent Health 1988; 5 (1): 63–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kiyak HA and Mulligan K. Studies of the relationship between oral health and psychological well-being.” Gerodont 1987; 3 (3): 109–12.
   Google Scholar
• Waldram J, Herring D,Young T. Aboriginal Health in Canada: Historical, Cultural and Epidemiological Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1995.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil JD, Lemchuk-Favel L,Allard Y, Postl BD. Community Healing and Aboriginal Self-Government: Is the Circle Closing?” In: Hylton JH, ed.Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada. Saskatoon: Punch Publishing 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson M. Who’s North? Political Change, Political Development and Self-Government in the Northwest Territories. Vancouver: UBC Press and Arctic Institute of North America 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy R. The Road to Nunavut: Progress of the Eastern Arctic Inuit Since the Second World War. Kingston: McGill University Press 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer A. Radical Political Economy: A Critique. Oxford: Blackwell 1995; political economy is defined as an approach that views “the economy as socially and politically embedded and as structured by power relations.”
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong P, Armstrong H, Coburn D. Unhealthy Times: Political Economy Perspectives on Health and Care in Canada. New York: Oxford University Press 2001.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil JD.The politics of health in the Fourth World:A Northern Canadian example. Human Organisation 1986; 45 (2): 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks J. and White G. Nunavut: Inuit self-determination through land claims and public government? In: Dahl J, Hicks J and Jull P, eds. Nunavut: Inuit Regain Control of Their Lands and Their Lives. Copenhagen: IWG IA 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tester FJ.The Evolution of Health and Social Services for Nunavut: Class, ethnicity and public versus private provision. School of Social Work and Family Studies and the Institute for Resources and Environment, University of British Columbia 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington M. Native Economic Development Corporations: Political and Economic Change in Canada’s North. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee 1986.
   Google Scholar
• FNIHB is the administrative structure of the Canadian State that coordinates and manages health care services delivered to certain Canadian Aboriginal populations (i.e. First Nations, Inuit, lnnu). In contradistinction to all other Canadian health services, which are administered and delivered by the Provinces, FNIHB directly (or indirectly through contractors) delivers all health services to these Aboriginal populations as per its historical relationship with these groups.
   Google Scholar
• NIHB provides for some non-insured health services to some Aboriginal populations (First Nations, Inuit, Innu).These services lie beyond those insured for the general Canadian population as per the 1984 Canada Health Act (i.e. physician and hospital services) and are thus considered ‘non-insured.’ They are normally accessed in the market and have come to be defined by FNIHB as “pharmacy (including prescription and over-the-counter drugs and medical supplies/equipment), dental service, glasses and other vision care aids and services, transportation to access medically required services, health care premiums (in two Canadian provinces), and other health care services including crisis intervention, mental health counselling and selected other health services.”
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Standing Committee on Health: First Nations and Inuit Dental Health. Ottawa: Senate of Canada 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. Standing Committee on Public Accounts Tenth Report on the October 2000 Report of the Auditor General of Canada: Health Canada — First Nations Health: Follow-up. Ottawa: Parliament of Canada 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General of Canada. Chapter 15: Health Canada — First Nations Health: Follow-up. Ottawa: Auditor General of Canada 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General of Canada. Chapter 13: Health Canada — First Nations Health. Ottawa:Auditor General of Canada 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Auditor General of Canada. Chapter 19: Department of National Health and Welfare: Non-Insured Health Benefits. Ottawa:Auditor General of Canada 1993.
   Google Scholar
• In Canada, the inherent rights of some Indigenous populations and their governments are recognised under Section 32 of the Canadian Constitution.These rights constitute a ‘special fiduciary relationship’ between some Aboriginal populations and the Canadian State. The extrapolated details of these rights developed through historical documentation (i.e. the Indian Act, the early Treaties, and potentially oral histories). As ‘status Indians’ under the Indian Act, some Aboriginal groups are part of this particular and specific fiduciary relationship.Thus for First Nations, Inuit and lnnu governments, access to the NIHBs are based on an individual’s inherent rights as an Indigenous person whereby the status of ‘Indian’ is seen to guarantee rights to these services.
   Google Scholar
• Davey K. Primary Dental Care in Canadian Arctic Communities. Arctic Med Res 1988; 47(Supplementl): 562–563.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhall J. The Oral Health of the First Residents: Who’s in Charge? Arctic Med Res 1984; 38: 431–435.
   Google Scholar
• Milnes A, Rubin C, Karpa M, Tate R.A retrospective analysis of the costs associated with the treatment of nursing caries in a remote Canadian Aboriginal pre-school population. Comm Dent Oral Epi 1992; 21: 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer J, Forgay M, Clovis J, Graham B. A collaborative approach to developing dental health resources for Northern communities. Arctic Med Res 1991; 50(Supplement 5): 666-667.
   Google Scholar
• Messer J. The effect of non-insured health benefits on dental treatment provided in four coastal Labrador communities by salaried dentists. Arctic Med Res 1991; 50(Supplement 5): 662-663.
   Google Scholar