Identification and characterization of EGF receptor in individual exosomes by fluorescence-activated vesicle sorting

References

• Colombo M, Raposo G, Thery C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014; 30: 255–89.
   Google Scholar
• Shifrin DA Jr., Demory Beckler M, Coffey RJ, Tyska MJ. Extracellular vesicles: communication, coercion, and conditioning. Mol Biol Cell. 2013; 24: 1253–9.
   Google Scholar
• Patton JG, Franklin JL, Weaver AM, Vickers K, Zhang B, Coffey RJ, etal. Biogenesis, delivery, and function of extracellular RNA. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4 27494, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27494 .
   Google Scholar
• Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics. 2010; 73: 1907–20.
   Google Scholar
• Penfornis P, Vallabhaneni KC, Whitt J, Pochampally R. Extracellular vesicles as carriers of microRNA, proteins and lipids in tumor microenvironment. Int J Cancer. 2016; 138: 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• EL Andaloussi S, Mager I, Breakefield XO, Wood MJ. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12: 347–57.
   Google Scholar
• Booth AM, Fang Y, Fallon JK, Yang JM, Hildreth JE, Gould SJ. Exosomes and HIV Gag bud from endosome-like domains of the T cell plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 2006; 172: 923–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nabhan JF, Hu R, Oh RS, Cohen SN, Lu Q. Formation and release of arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) at plasma membrane by recruitment of TSG101 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 4146–51.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham JN, Demory Beckler M, Gephart JD, Franklin JL, Bogatcheva G, Kremers GJ, etal. Amphiregulin exosomes increase cancer cell invasion. Curr Biol. 2011; 21: 779–86.
   Google Scholar
• Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009; 9: 581–93.
   Google Scholar
• Quesenberry PJ, Aliotta J, Camussi G, Abdel-Mageed AB, Wen S, Goldberg L, etal. Potential functional applications of extracellular vesicles: a report by the NIH Common Fund Extracellular RNA Communication Consortium. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4 27575, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27575 [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Caby MP, Lankar D, Vincendeau-Scherrer C, Raposo G, Bonnerot C. Exosomal-like vesicles are present in human blood plasma. Int Immunol. 2005; 17: 879–87.
   Google Scholar
• Graner MW, Alzate O, Dechkovskaia AM, Keene JD, Sampson JH, Mitchell DA, etal. Proteomic and immunologic analyses of brain tumor exosomes. FASEB J. 2009; 23: 1541–57.
   Google Scholar
• Im H, Shao H, Park YI, Peterson VM, Castro CM, Weissleder R, etal. Label-free detection and molecular profiling of exosomes with a nano-plasmonic sensor. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 490–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser KB, Moehle MS, Daher JP, Webber PJ, Williams JY, Stewart CA, etal. LRRK2 secretion in exosomes is regulated by 14-3-3. Hum Mol Genet. 2013; 22: 4988–5000.
   Google Scholar
• Hardij J, Cecchet F, Berquand A, Gheldof D, Chatelain C, Mullier F, etal. Characterisation of tissue factor-bearing extracellular vesicles with AFM: comparison of air-tapping-mode AFM and liquid Peak Force AFM. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013; 2 21045, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v2i0.21045 .
   Google Scholar
• van der Pol E, Coumans FA, Grootemaat AE, Gardiner C, Sargent IL, Harrison P, etal. Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12: 1182–92.
   Google Scholar
• Yuana Y, Koning RI, Kuil ME, Rensen PC, Koster AJ, Bertina RM, etal. Cryo-electron microscopy of extracellular vesicles in fresh plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013; 2 21494, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v2i0.21494 .
   Google Scholar
• Yuana Y, Oosterkamp TH, Bahatyrova S, Ashcroft B, Garcia Rodriguez P, Bertina RM, etal. Atomic force microscopy: a novel approach to the detection of nanosized blood microparticles. J Throm Haemost. 2010; 8: 315–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Li C, Higginbotham JN, Franklin JL, Tabb DL, Graves-Deal R, etal. Use of fluorescence-activated vesicle sorting for isolation of Naked2-associated, basolaterally targeted exocytic vesicles for proteomics analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008; 7: 1651–67.
   Google Scholar
• Poncelet P, Robert S, Bouriche T, Bez J, Lacroix R, Dignat-George F. Standardized counting of circulating platelet microparticles using currently available flow cytometers and scatter-based triggering: forward or side scatter?. Cytometry A. 2016; 89: 148–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gross ME, Zorbas MA, Danels YJ, Garcia R, Gallick GE, Olive M, etal. Cellular growth response to epidermal growth factor in colon carcinoma cells with an amplified epidermal growth factor receptor derived from a familial adenomatous polyposis patient. Cancer Res. 1991; 51: 1452–9. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson MP, Keller S, Alonso A, Riedle S, Dempsey PJ, Altevogt P. Generation of novel, secreted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1) isoforms via metalloprotease-dependent ectodomain shedding and exosome secretion. J Cell Biochem. 2008; 103: 1783–97.
   Google Scholar
• Walker F, Rothacker J, Henderson C, Nice EC, Catimel B, Zhang HH, etal. Ligand binding induces a conformational change in epidermal growth factor receptor dimers. Growth Factors. 2012; 30: 394–409.
   Google Scholar
• Gan HK, Burgess AW, Clayton AH, Scott AM. Targeting of a conformationally exposed, tumor-specific epitope of EGFR as a strategy for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2012; 72: 2924–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto T, Sato JD, Le A, Polikoff J, Sato GH, Mendelsohn J. Growth stimulation of A431 cells by epidermal growth factor: identification of high-affinity receptors for epidermal growth factor by an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983; 80: 1337–41.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Kerbel RS, Allison AC, Rak J. Endothelial expression of autocrine VEGF upon the uptake of tumor-derived microvesicles containing oncogenic EGFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 3794–9.
   Google Scholar
• Baietti MF, Zhang Z, Mortier E, Melchior A, Degeest G, Geeraerts A, etal. Syndecan-syntenin-ALIX regulates the biogenesis of exosomes. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14: 677–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ghossoub R, Lembo F, Rubio A, Gaillard CB, Bouchet J, Vitale N, etal. Syntenin-ALIX exosome biogenesis and budding into multivesicular bodies are controlled by ARF6 and PLD2. Nat Commun. 2014; 5: 3477.
   Google Scholar
• Mathivanan S, Simpson RJ. ExoCarta: a compendium of exosomal proteins and RNA. Proteomics. 2009; 9: 4997–5000.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CL, Coffey RJ, Dempsey PJ. The proamphiregulin cytoplasmic domain is required for basolateral sorting, but is not essential for constitutive or stimulus-induced processing in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 29538–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CL, Meise KS, Plowman GD, Coffey RJ, Dempsey PJ. Cell surface ectodomain cleavage of human amphiregulin precursor is sensitive to a metalloprotease inhibitor. Release of a predominant N-glycosylated 43-kDa soluble form. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 17258–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gephart JD, Singh B, Higginbotham JN, Franklin JL, Gonzalez A, Folsch H, etal. Identification of a novel mono-leucine basolateral sorting motif within the cytoplasmic domain of amphiregulin. Traffic. 2011; 12: 1793–804.
   Google Scholar
• Erdbrugger U, Lannigan J. Analytical challenges of extracellular vesicle detection: a comparison of different techniques. Cytometry A. 2015; 89: 123–34.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler WL, Yeung W, Tait JF. A new microparticle size calibration standard for use in measuring smaller microparticles using a new flow cytometer. J Thromb Haemost. 2011; 9: 1216–24.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pol E, van Gemert MJ, Sturk A, Nieuwland R, van Leeuwen TG. Single vs. swarm detection of microparticles and exosomes by flow cytometry. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10: 919–30.
   Google Scholar
• Arraud N, Gounou C, Turpin D, Brisson AR. Fluorescence triggering: a general strategy for enumerating and phenotyping extracellular vesicles by flow cytometry. Cytometry A. 2015; 89: 184–95.
   Google Scholar
• Pospichalova V, Svoboda J, Dave Z, Kotrbova A, Kaiser K, Klemova D, etal. Simplified protocol for flow cytometry analysis of fluorescently labeled exosomes and microvesicles using dedicated flow cytometer. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4 25530, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.25530 [PubMed CentralFull Text].
   Google Scholar
• Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, van der Vlist EJ, Aalberts M, Mertens HC, Bosch BJ, Bartelink W, etal. Quantitative and qualitative flow cytometric analysis of nanosized cell-derived membrane vesicles. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8: 712–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vlist EJ, Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Stoorvogel W, Arkesteijn GJ, Wauben MH. Fluorescent labeling of nano-sized vesicles released by cells and subsequent quantitative and qualitative analysis by high-resolution flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2012; 7: 1311–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kormelink TG, Arkesteijn GJ, Nauwelaers FA, van den Engh G, Nolte-‘t Hoen EN, Wauben MH. Prerequisites for the analysis and sorting of extracellular vesicle subpopulations by high-resolution flow cytometry. Cytometry A. 2015; 89: 135–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro HM. Practical flow cytometry. 2003; New York: Wiley-Liss. 681. 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly EB, Phillips AC, Buchanan FG, Kingsbury G, Zhang Y, Meulbroek JA, etal. Characterization of ABT-806, a humanized tumor-specific anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015; 14: 1141–51.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent-Puig P, Cayre A, Manceau G, Buc E, Bachet JB, Lecomte T, etal. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5924–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, Emile JF, etal. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 3992–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pentheroudakis G, Kotoula V, De Roock W, Kouvatseas G, Papakostas P, Makatsoris T, etal. Biomarkers of benefit from cetuximab-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: interaction of EGFR ligand expression with RAS/RAF, PIK3CA genotypes. BMC Cancer. 2013; 13: 49.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett TP, Burgess AW, Gan HK, Luwor RB, Cartwright G, Walker F, etal. Antibodies specifically targeting a locally misfolded region of tumor associated EGFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 5082–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kozer N, Kelly MP, Orchard S, Burgess AW, Scott AM, Clayton AH. Differential and synergistic effects of epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies on unliganded ErbB dimers and oligomers. Biochemistry. 2011; 50: 3581–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ST, Ji H, Greening DW, Speirs RW, Rigopoulos A, Pillay V, etal. Global protein profiling reveals anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody 806-modulated proteins in A431 tumor xenografts. Growth Factors. 2013; 31: 154–64.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Ji H, Zaghlul S, McNamara K, Liang MC, Shimamura T, etal. Therapeutic anti-EGFR antibody 806 generates responses in murine de novo EGFR mutant-dependent lung carcinomas. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 346–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ymer SI, Greenall SA, Cvrljevic A, Cao DX, Donoghue JF, Epa VC, etal. Glioma specific extracellular missense mutations in the first cysteine rich region of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) initiate ligand independent activation. Cancers (Basel). 2011; 3: 2032–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen DK, Hvam ML, Primdahl-Bengtson B, Boysen AT, Whitehead B, Dyrskjot L, etal. Comparative analysis of discrete exosome fractions obtained by differential centrifugation. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014; 3 25011, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.25011 .
   Google Scholar