A standardized method to determine the concentration of extracellular vesicles using tunable resistive pulse sensing

References

• Yanez-Mo M, Siljander PRM, Andreu Z, Zavec AB, Borras FE, Buzas EI, etal. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4: 27066. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27066 [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• van der Pol E, Böing AN, Harrison P, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol Rev. 2012; 64: 676–705.
   Google Scholar
• De Toro J, Herschlik L, Waldner C, Mongini C. Emerging roles of exosomes in normal and pathological conditions: new insights for diagnosis and therapeutic applications. Front Immunol. 2015; 6: 203.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Sharples RA, Scicluna BJ, Hill AF. Exosomes provide a protective and enriched source of miRNA for biomarker profiling compared to intracellular and cell-free blood. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014; 3: 23743. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.23743.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Erviti L, Seow Y, Yin H, Betts C, Lakhal S, Wood MJ. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 341–5.
   Google Scholar
• Korgel BA, van Zanten JH, Monbouquette HG. Vesicle size distributions measured by flow field-flow fractionation coupled with multiangle light scattering. Biophys J. 1998; 74: 3264–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sitar S, Kejzar A, Pahovnik D, Kogej K, Tusek-Znidaric M, Lenassi M, etal. Size characterization and quantification of exosomes by asymmetrical-flow field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem. 2015; 87: 9225–33.
   Google Scholar
• Théry C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. 2006; Wiley Chapter 3: Unit 3.22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Donowitz M. Ivanov A. Fractionation of subcellular membrane vesicles of epithelial and nonepithelial cells by OptiPrep™ density gradient ultracentrifugation. Exocytosis and endocytosis: methods in molecular biology, Vol. 440. 2008; Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman BM, Hanssen E, Lawson VA, Hill AF. Prion-infected cells regulate the release of exosomes with distinct ultrastructural features. FASEB J. 2012; 26: 4160–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrup A, Zhang S-H, Svensson KJ, Kucharzewska P, Johansson MC, Mörgelin M, etal. Magnetic nanoparticle-based isolation of endocytic vesicles reveals a role of the heat shock protein GRP75 in macromolecular delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 13342–7.
   Google Scholar
• Greening DW, Xu R, Ji H, Tauro BJ, Simpson RJ. A protocol for exosome isolation and characterization: evaluation of ultracentrifugation, density-gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods. Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1295: 179–209. [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Böing AN, van der Pol E, Grootemaat AE, Coumans FA, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Single-step isolation of extracellular vesicles from plasma by size-exclusion chromatography. 2014; Rotterdam: International Society of Extracellular Vesicles ISEV. 118 p.
   Google Scholar
• Welton JL, Webber JP, Botos L-A, Jones M, Clayton A. Ready-made chromatography columns for extracellular vesicle isolation from plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4: 27269. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27269 [PubMed Abstract].
   Google Scholar
• Böing AN, van der Pol E, Grootemaat AE, Coumans FAW, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Single step isolation of extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014; 3: 23430. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.23430.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pol E, Coumans FAW, Grootemaat AE, Gardiner C, Sargent IL, Harrison P, etal. Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12: 1182–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sowerby SJ, Broom MF, Petersen GB. Dynamically resizable nanometre-scale apertures for molecular sensing. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2007; 123: 325–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts GS, Kozak D, Anderson W, Broom MF, Vogel R, Trau M. Tunable nano/micropores for particle detection and discrimination: scanning ion occlusion spectroscopy. Small. 2010; 6: 2653–8.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts GS, Yu S, Zeng QL, Chan LCL, Anderson W, Colby AH, etal. Tunable pores for measuring concentrations of synthetic and biological nanoparticle dispersions. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012; 31: 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel R, Willmott G, Kozak D, Roberts GS, Anderson W, Groenewegen L, etal. Quantitative sizing of nano/microparticles with a tunable elastomeric pore sensor. Anal Chem. 2011; 83: 3499–506.
   Google Scholar
• de Vrij J, Maas SLN, van Nispen M, Sena-Esteves M, Limpens RWA, Koster AJ, etal. Quantification of nanosized extracellular membrane vesicles with scanning ion occlusion sensing. Nanomedicine. 2013; 8: 1443–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel R, Anderson W, Eldridge J, Glossop B, Willmott G. A variable pressure method for characterizing nanoparticle surface charge using pore sensors. Anal Chem. 2012; 84: 3125–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak D, Anderson W, Vogel R, Chen S, Antaw F, Trau M. Simultaneous size and zeta-potential measurements of individual nanoparticles in dispersion using size-tunable pore sensors. ACS Nano. 2012; 6: 6990–7.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge JA, Willmott GR, Anderson W, Vogel R. Nanoparticle zeta-potential measurements using tunable resistive pulse sensing with variable pressure. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014; 429: 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak D, Anderson W, Vogel R, Trau M. Advances in resistive pulse sensors: devices bridging the void between molecular and microscopic detection. Nano Today. 2011; 6: 531–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lane RE, Korbie D, Anderson W, Vaidyanathan R, Trau M. Analysis of exosome purification methods using a model liposome system and tunable-resistive pulse sensing. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 7639.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson W, Lane R, Korbie D, Trau M. Observations of tunable resistive pulse sensing for exosome analysis: improving system sensitivity and stability. Langmuir. 2015; 31: 6577–87.
   Google Scholar
• Osteikoetxea X, Sodar B, Nemeth A, Szabo-Taylor K, Paloczi K, Vukman KV, etal. Differential detergent sensitivity of extracellular vesicle subpopulations. Org Biomol Chem. 2015; 13: 9775–82.
   Google Scholar
• Axelson DE. Data preprocessing for chemometric and metabonomic analysis. 2012; 2nd ed, MRi_Consulting. p. 330–337. Available from: http://www.amazon.de/Data-Preprocessing-Chemometric-Metabonomic-Analysis/dp/1470042827#reader_1470042827.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics. 2006; 7: 142.
   Google Scholar
• Witwer KW, Buzás EI, Bemis LT, Bora A, Lässer C, Lötvall J, etal. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013; 2: 20360. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360.
   Google Scholar
• Maas SLN, de Vrij J, van der Vlist EJ, Geragousian B, van Bloois L, Mastrobattista E, etal. Possibilities and limitations of current technologies for quantification of biological extracellular vesicles and synthetic mimics. J Control Release. 2015; 200: 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Varga Z, Yuana Y, Grootemaat AE, van der Pol E, Gollwitzer C, Krumrey M, etal. Towards traceable size determination of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014; 3: 23298. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.23298.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meel R, Fens M, Vader P, van Solinge WW, Eniola-Adefeso O, Schiffelers RM. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: lessons from the liposome field. J Control Release. 2014; 195: 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M, etal. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10: 1470–6.
   Google Scholar
• Balaj L, Lessard R, Dai LX, Cho YJ, Pomeroy SL, Breakefield XO, etal. Tumour microvesicles contain retrotransposon elements and amplified oncogene sequences. Nat Commun. 2011; 2: 180.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Gillespie BM, Palanisamy V, Gimzewski JK. Quantitative nanostructural and single-molecule force spectroscopy biomolecular analysis of human-saliva-derived exosomes. Langmuir. 2011; 27: 14394–400.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson W, Kozak D, Coleman VA, Jamting AK, Trau M. A comparative study of submicron particle sizing platforms: accuracy, precision and resolution analysis of polydisperse particle size distributions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013; 405: 322–30.
   Google Scholar
• Farr RS. Random close packing fractions of lognormal distributions of hard spheres. Powder Technol. 2013; 245: 28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubachevsky BD, Stillinger FH. Geometric properties of random disk packings. J Stat Phy. 1990; 60: 561–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchiyama N, Tanaka T. Porosity of a mass of solid particles having a range of sizes. Ind Eng Chem Fundamen. 1981; 20: 66–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hern CS, Silbert LE, Liu AJ, Nagel SR. Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: the epitome of disorder. Phys Rev E. 2003; 68: 011306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix R, Robert S, Poncelet P, Kasthuri RS, Key NS, Dignat-George F, etal. Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle enumeration by flow cytometry with calibrated beads: results of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis SSC Collaborative workshop. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8: 2571–4.
   Google Scholar