543
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Faculty Evaluations by Medicine Residents Using Known versus Anonymous Systems

, MD, , MD, , MD & , MEd PhD
Article: 4380 | Published online: 09 Dec 2009

References

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Institutional Requirements, http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/irc/ircIRCpr703.asp [Accessed April 1, 20051.
  • Graduate Medical Education Directory 2002-2003. 86th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2002.
  • Watson RT, Romrell JJ. Mission-based budgeting: Removing a graveyard. Acad Med, 1999, 74: 627–640.
  • Mehrens W, Lehmann I. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 4th Ed. NY; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1991.
  • Albanese MA. Challenges in user rater judgments in medical education, J Eval Chin Pract, 2000; 6: 305–319.
  • Albanese MA. Rating educational quality: factors in the erosion of professional standards. Acad Med, 1999; 74: 652–658.
  • Pelsang RE, Smith WL. Comparison of anonymous student ballots with student debriefing for faculty evaluations. Med Educ, 2000; 34: 465–467.
  • Smith SR, Paulen U. Use of anonymous student evaluations of faculty members in U.S. medical schools. J Med Edu, 1984; 59: 196–97.
  • Argulewicz EN, O’Keefe T. An investigation of signed vs. anonymously completed ratings of high school student teachers. Educ Res. Q, 1978; 3: 39–44.
  • Cheong, GSC. Students’ evaluation of instructors: before and after the examination, names identified versus anonymous. Can J Higher Educ, 1979; 9: 80–86.
  • Ronning RR, Walsh UR. Effects of student anonymity-nonanonymity on the factor structure of a teacher rating form. Res Higher Educ, 1977; 6: 363–371.
  • Stone EF, Spool MD, Rabinowitz S. Effects of anonymity and retaliatory potential on student evaluations of faculty performance. Res Higher Educ, 1977; 6: 313–324.
  • Braskamp LA, Ory, JC. Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
  • Cashin WE. Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited, Idea Paper No. 32. Education Resources Information Center, 1995; ED 402 338, http://:www.eric.ed.gov [Accessed April 1, 20051.
  • Cashin WE. Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research, Idea Paper No. 20. Education Resources Information Center, ED 302567, http://www.eric.ed.gov [Accessed April 1, 20051.
  • Centra JA. Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determning Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
  • Feldman KA. The significance of circumstances for college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses. Res in Higher Ed 1979; 10: 149–172.
  • Marsh HW, Dunkin M. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. IN JC Smart (Ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 8, pp. 143-223). New York: Agathon, 1992.
  • Irby DM, Gillmore GM, Ramsey PG. Factors affecting ratings of clinical teachers by medical students residents. J Med Educ, 1987; 62: 1–7.
  • Ramsbottom-Lucier MT, Gillmore GM, Irby DM, Ramsey PG. Evaluation of clinical teaching by general internal medicine faculty in outpatient and inpatient settings. Acad Med, 1994; 69: 152–154.
  • Williams BC, Lizelman DK, Babbott SF, Lubitz RM, Hofer TP. Validation of a global measure of faculty’s clinical teaching performance. Acad Med, 2002; 77: 177–180.
  • Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Blane CE, Fitzgerald JT. Improvement of faculty performance: efficacy of resident evaluation. Acad Rad, 1996; 3: 63–7.
  • Whitman N, Schwenk T. Faculty evaluations as a means of faculty development. J Fam Prac 1982; 14: 1097–101.
  • Schum T, Yindra KJ. Relationship between systematic feedback to faculty and ratings of clinical teaching. Acad Med, 1996; 71: 1100–2.