Impact of Labor and Delivery Simulation Classes in Undergraduate Medical Learning

References

• Association of American Medical Colleges. Report I. Medical School Objectives Project: Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education, Guidelines for Medical Schools. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/msop1.pdf. Accessed: 2008-06-25. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5YqMMjxqe).
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education: Tomorrow’s doctors. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/GMC_tomorrows_doctors.pdf. Accessed: 2008-06-25. (Archived by Web-Cite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5Yq0e1lY0)
   Google Scholar
• Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME). Report of Meeting: 3-5 December 1999, London, UK. Med Teach 2000; 22 (3): 242–245.
   Google Scholar
• Sanson-Fisher RW, Lynagh MC. Problem-based learning: a dissemination success story? Med J Aust 2005; 183 (5): 258–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good ML. Patient simulation for basic and advanced clinical skills. Med Educ 2003; 37 (Suppl. 1):14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JB, Taqueti VR. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13(Suppl 1):ill–i18.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-Based Medical Education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003; 78: 783–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, Pringle S, Harden RM, Khogah S, MS G. Adoption and integration of simulation-based learning technologies into the curriculum of a UK undergraduate education programme. Med Educ 2003; 37(Supp1.1):42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Macedonia CR, Gherman RB, Satin AJ. Simulationlaboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (2): 388–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle DJ. Simulation in medical education: Focus on Anesthesiology. Med Educ Online [serial on-line] 2002; 7: 16. Available from: http://www.med-ed-online.org/f0000053.htm. Accessed: 2008-06-25. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5YqN8tCZ1)
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hog D. A canadian simulation experience:faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 779–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hog D. Evaluation of medicalstudents’ performance using the anaesthesia simulator. Med Educ 2000; 34: 42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh CM, Youngblood P. Development and validation of assessment measures for a newly developed physical examination simulator. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hog D, Guest CB, Herold J. Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anaesthesia simulator. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48 (3): 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, DeSousa S, Tarshis J. High-fidelity patient simulation: validation of performance checklists. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92 (3): 388–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalesnik SW, Mills SC, Olsen CH, Haffner WHJ, Zahn MC. Creating an ideal objective structured clinical exam for an obstetrics and gynecology medical student clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1544–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in Obsterics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008; 35: 97–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), Council of Deans for Health. Simulation and Practice Learning Project: Outcome of a pilot study to the test principles for auditing simulated practice learning environments in the pre-registration nursing programme. Final Report: Dec 2007. Available from: http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=3703. Accessed 2008-9-12. (Archived by WebCite® at http:www.webcitation.org/5am8HXGA3)
   Google Scholar
• Stith JS, Butterfield WH, Strube MJ, Deusinger SS, Gillespie DF. Personal, interpersonal, and organizational influences on student satisfaction with clinical education. Phys Ther 1998; 78 (6): 635–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaee V, Ahmadinejad Z, Morravedji AR. An evaluation on medical student satisfaction with clinical education and its effective factors. Med Educ Online [serial online] 2004; 9: 8. Available from: http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/f0000082.pdf. Accessed: 2008-06-25. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5YqNMkj9V)
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. International student edition: Mc-Graw-Hill; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Euliano TY. Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol Educ 2001; 25 (1): 36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JA, Shaffer DW, Raemer DB, Pawlowski J, Hurford WE, Cooper JB. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: A pilot study among clinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006; 11: 33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jude DC, Gilbert GG, Magrane D. Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerk-ship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1489–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese AC. Implications of results from cognitive science research for medical education. Med Educ Online [serial online] 1998;3,1. Available from: http://www.med-ed-online.org/f0000010.htm Accessed: 2008-06-25. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5YqNVEW3B)
   Google Scholar
• Bradley P, Postlethwaite K. Simulation in clinical learning. Med Educ 2003; 37(Supp1.1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone RL. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003; 37: 267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar