2,933
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A holistic review of the medical school admission process: examining correlates of academic underperformance

&
Article: 22919 | Received 26 Sep 2013, Accepted 21 Feb 2014, Published online: 01 Apr 2014

References

  • Addams AN , Bletzinger RB , Sondheimer HM , White SE , Johnson LM . Roadmap to diversity: integrating holistic review practices into medical school admission processes. 2010; Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
  • Witzburg RA , Sondheimer HM . Holistic review – shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1565–7.
  • Edwards JC , Elam CL , Wagoner NE . An admission model for medical schools. Acad Med. 2001; 76: 1207–12.
  • Monroe A , Quinn E , Samuelson W , Dunleavy DM , Dowd KW . An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s?. Acad Med. 2013; 88: 672–81.
  • Albanese MA , Snow MH , Skochelak SE , Huggett KN , Farrell PM . Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 313–21.
  • Reiter HI , Eva KW . Reflecting the relative values of community, faculty and students in the admissions tools of medical school. Teach and Learn in Med. 2005; 17: 4–8.
  • Elam CL , Stratton TD , Scott KL , Wilson JF , Lieber A . Review, deliberation, and voting: a study of selection decisions in a medical school admission committee. Teach and Learn in Med. 2002; 14: 98–103.
  • Kreiter CD . A proposal for evaluating the validity of holistic-based admission processes. Teach and Learn in Med. 2013; 25: 103–7.
  • McDougle L , Mavis BE , Jeffe DB , Roberts NK , Ephgrave K , Hageman HL , etal. Academic and professional career outcomes of medical school graduates who failed USMLE Step 1 on the first attempt. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013; 18: 279–89.
  • Winston KA , van der Vleuten CP , Scherpbier AJ . At-risk medical students: implications of students’ voice for the theory and practice of remediation. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 1038–47.
  • DeVoe P , Niles C , Andrews N , Benjamin A , Blacklock L , Brainard A , etal. Lessons learned from a study-group pilot program for medical students perceived to be “at risk”. Med Teach. 2007; 29: e37–40.
  • Sayer M , Chaput De Saintonge M , Evans D , Wood D . Support for students with academic difficulties. Med Educ. 2002; 36: 643–50.
  • Mayer JD , Saolvey P , Caruso DR . Mayer-Saoley-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). 2002; North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc..
  • Costa PT Jr , McCrae RR . Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). 1992; Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..
  • IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Durning SJ , Cohen DL , Cruess D , McManigle JM , MacDonald R . Does student promotions committee appearance predict below-average performance during internship? A seven-year study. Teach and Learn in Med. 2008; 20: 643–50.
  • White CB , Dey EL , Fantone JC . Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009; 14: 455–64.
  • Paul G , Hinman G , Dottl S , Passon J . Academic development: a survey of academic difficulties experienced by medical students and support services provided. Teach and Learn in Med. 2009; 21: 254–60.
  • Murdoch-Eaton DG , Levene MI . Formal appraisal of undergraduate medical students: is it worth the effort?. Med Teach. 2004; 26: 28–32.
  • Megginson L . Noncognitive constructs in graduate admissions: an integrative review of available instruments. Nurse Educator. 2009; 34: 254–61.
  • Webb CT , Sedlacek W , Cohen D , Shields P , Gracely E , Hawkins M , etal. The impact of nonacademic variables on performance at two medical schools. J Nat Med Assoc. 1997; 89: 173–80.