Categories of learning-oriented leadership: a potential contribution to the school context

References

• Agashae Z., Bratton J. Leader-follower dynamics: Developing a learning environment. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2001; 13(3): 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Amy A.H. Leaders as facilitators of individual and organizational learning. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2008; 29(3): 212–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bass B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. 1985; New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie R.S. Line managers and workplace learning. Learning from the voluntary sector. Human Resource Development International. 2006; 9(1):99–119. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13678860600563366.
   Google Scholar
• Billett S. Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2004; 16(6): 312–324.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom N., Lemos R., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. Does management matter in schools?. The Economic Journal. 2015; 125(May): 647–674.
   Google Scholar
• Bredin K., Söderlund J. Reconceptualising line management in project-based organisations. The case of competence coaches at Tetra Pak. Personnel Review. 2007; 36(5): 815–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns J.M. Leadership. 1978; New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark A., Grönqvist E., Vlachos J. The headmaster ritual: The importance of management for school outcomes (Working paper 2012:16). 2012; Uppsala: The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Cedefop. Learning while working. Success stories on workplace learning in Europe. 2011; Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon N. The organizational learning cycle. How we can learn collectively. 1994; London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Doornbos A.J., Bolhuis S., Simons P.R.-J. Modeling work-related learning on the basis of intentionality and developmental relatedness: A noneducational perspective. Human Resource Development Review. 2004; 3(3): 250–273.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M. The qualifying experience. Learning from disturbances in relation to automated production. 1997; Solna: National Institute for Working Life. In Swedish Work and Health 1997:10.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M, Farrell L., Fenwick T. Organizational learning. Competence-bearing relations and breakdowns of workplace relatonics. World year book of education 2007. Educating the global workforce. Knowledge, knowledge work and knowledge workers. 2007; London: Routledge. 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M., Johansson P., Wilhelmson L. Beyond being present: Learning-oriented leadership in the daily work of middle managers. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2015a; 27(6):408–425. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2014-0077.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M., Johansson P., Wilhelmson L. Organizational learning as an analogy to individual learning? A case of augmented interaction intensity. Vocations and Learning. 2015b; 8(1):55–73. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12186-014-9125-9.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M., Ohlsson J, Ohlsson J., Döös M. Relating theory construction to practice development – Some contextual didactic reflections. Pedagogic interventions as conditions for learning. 1999; Stockholm: Department of Education, Stockholm University. 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M., Wilhelmson L. Collective learning: Interaction and a shared action arena. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2011; 23(8): 487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Döös M., Wilhelmson L. Proximity and distance: Phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team. Quality & Quantity. 2014; 48(2):1089–1106. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger A.D. Contextual factors influencing informal learning in a workplace setting: The case of “reinventing itself company.”.Human Resource Development Quartely. 2005; 16(3): 389–415.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger A.D., Bostrom R.P. An examination of managers’ beliefs about their roles as facilitators of learning. Management Learning. 2002; 33(2): 147–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellinger A.D., Cseh M. Contextual factors influencing the facilitation of others’ learning through everyday work experiences. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2007; 19(7): 435–452.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström E., Ekholm B., Ellström P.-E. Two types of learning environment. Enabling and constraining a study of care work. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2008; 20(2): 84–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström P.-E. Competence, education and learning in working life. Problems, concepts and theoretical perspectives. 1992; Stockholm: Publica. In Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström P.-E. Integrating learning at work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2001; 12(4): 421–435.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström P.-E. Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2010; 22(1/2): 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ellström P.-E, Malloch M., Cairns L., Evans K., O'Connor B.N. Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. The Sage handbook of workplace learning. 2011; London: Sage. 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut M, Malloch M., Cairns L., Evans K., O'Connor B.N. How researching learning at work can lead to tools for enhancing learning. The Sage handbook of workplace learning. 2011; London: Sage. 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fann K.T. Peirce's theory of abduction. 1970; Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes A., Andersson P. Recognising prior learning: Understanding the relations among experience, learning and recognition from a constructivist perspective. Vocations and Learning. 2009; 2(1): 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone W.A. Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher. 1993; 22(4): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger P. Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2003; 33(3): 329–351.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger P. Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 2005; 4(3): 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Harris A. Distributed leadership and school improvement. Leading or misleading?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2004; 32(1): 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harris A. Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2007; 10(3): 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg I., Tyrstrup M. Well then – What now? An everyday approach to managerial leadership. Leadership. 2010; 6(4): 353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy W.K., Miskel C.G. Educational administration. Theory, research, and practice. 2008; 8th ed., Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris K. A model for learning in working life. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2004; 16(8): 431–441.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson P. Learning environments in the workplace. The construction of learning environments in a VET-program from an organizational pedagogical point of view. 2011; Stockholm: Department of Education, Stockholm University. In Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb A.Y., Kolb D.A. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2005; 4(2): 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb A.Y., Kolb D.A. Learning to play, playing to learn. A case study of a ludic learning space. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2010; 23(1): 26–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb D.A. Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. 1984; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans H., Doornbos A.J., van Eekelen I.M. Learning in interactive work situations: It takes two to tango; why not invite both partners to dance?. Human Resource Development Quartely. 2006; 17(2): 135158.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson P. Conditions of change. A study of organisational learning and change in schools. 2004; Stockholm: EFI, Stockholm School of Economics. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Larsson P., Löwstedt J, Löwstedt J., Larsson P., Karsten S., Van Dick R. Refining the expedition: Individual, team and organisational development. From intensified work to professional development. 2007; Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Löfberg A, Leymann H., Kornbluh H. Learning and educational intervention from a constructivist point of view: The case of workplace learning. Socialization and learning at work. A new approach to the learning process in the workplace and society. 1989; Aldershot: Avebury. 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Macneill N., Cavanagh R.F., Silcox S. Pedagogic leadership: Refocusing on learning and teaching. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning. 2005; 9(2):
   Google Scholar
• Male T., Palaiologou I. Learning-centred leadership or pedagogical leadership? An alternative approach to leadership in education contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice. 2012; 15(1):107–118. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.617839.
   Google Scholar
• Nestor B. Pedagogic leadership in a principal and organisational perspective. 2006; Stockholm: School of Education, Centre for Educational Management. 146–189. In Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski C. Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2012; 49(2): 310–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noer D. Behaviorally based coaching: A cross-cultural case study. International Journal of Coaching in Organizations. 2005; 3(1): 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson J. Team learning: Collective reflection processes in teacher teams. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2013; 25(5): 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. Human error. 1990; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg J., Targama A. Managing understanding in organizations. 2007; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk D.H. Learning theories. An educational perspective. 2004; 4th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. The head teacher and the chain of command. 2015; Stockholm: Swedish Government Official Reports. In Swedish, English summary 22.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman L.A. Plans and situated actions. The problem of human machine communication. 1987; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundström-Frisk C, Menckel E., Kullinger B., Axelsson P.-O., Hallgren L.-E. The human factor. Fifteen years of occupational-accident research in Sweden. 1996; Stockholm: Swedish Council for Work Life Research. 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• The National Agency for Education. Research for the class room. Scientific ground and tested experience in practice. 2013; Stockholm: The National Agency for Education. In Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Wallo A. The leader as facilitator of learning at work. A study of learning-oriented leadership in two industrial firms. 2008; Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Warhurst R.P. Learning in an age of cuts: Managers as enablers of workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2013; 25(1): 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Webb R. Leading teaching and learning in the primary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2005; 33(1): 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson L., Johansson P., Döös M, Wang S., Hartsell T. Bridging boundaries: Middle managers’ pedagogic interventions as technology leaders. Technology integration and foundations for effective leadership. 2013; Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R.K. Case study research. Design and methods. 1989; Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 2002; 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl G. Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly. 2009; 20: 49–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.006.
   Google Scholar