On-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: a review

References

• Acar Y.B., Gale R.J. Electokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 1995; 40: 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aislabie J., Saul D.E., Foght J.M. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles. 2006; 10: 171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkorta I., Becerril J.M., Garbisu C. Phytostabilization of metal contaminated soils. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2010; 25: 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Arienzo M., Adamo P., Cozzolino V. The potential of Lolium perenne for revegetation of contaminated soil from a metallurgical site. Science of the Total Environment. 2004; 319: 13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babel S., Kurniawan T.A. Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2003; 97: 219–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin J., Borrego R., Rossi A., Horwitz S. Grant S.A., Iskander I. Subsurface barrier and recovery trench for contaminant removal: naval Arctic research laboratory Point Barrow, Alaska. Contaminant hydrology: cold regions modeling. 2010; Boca Raton: Lewis CRC Press. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Baraud F., Fourcade M.C., Tellier S., Astruc M. Modelling of decontamination rate in an electrokinetic soil processing. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 1998; 68: 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraud F., Tellier S., Astruc M. Ion velocity in soil solution during electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 1997; 56: 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargagli R. Environmental contamination in Antarctic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment. 2008; 400: 212–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta N. T., McGowen S. L. Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution. 2004; 127: 73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathurst R.J., Rowe R.K., Zeeb B., Reimer K. A geocomposite barrier for hydrocarbon containment in the Arctic. International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories. 2006; 1: 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bell T.H., Callender K.L., Whyte L.G., Greer C.W. Microbial competition in polar soils: a review of an understudied but potentially important control on productivity. Biology. 2013; 2: 533–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackwell M.S.A., Brookes P.C., de la Fuente-Martinez N., Gordon H., Murray P.J., Snars K.E., Williams J.K., Bol R., Haygarth P.M., Donald L.S. Sparks D.L. Phosphorus solubilization and potential transfer to surface waters from the soil microbial biomass following drying–rewetting and freezing–thawing. Advances in agronomy. 2010; New York: Academic Press. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette R.A., Held B.W., Jurgen J.A., Aislabie J., Duncan S., Farrell R.L. Environmental pollutants from the Scott and Shackleton expeditions during the ‘Heroic Age’ of Antarctic exploration. Polar Record. 2004; 40: 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J., Benner S.G., McRae C.W.T., Bennett T.A., Puls R.W. Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2000; 45: 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolan N.S., Adriano D.C., Mani A.P., Duraisamy A. Immobilization and phytoavailability of cadmium in variable charge soils. II. Effect of lime compost. Plant Soil. 2003; 251: 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S.L., Chaney R.L., Angle J.S., Baker A.J.M. Zinc and cadmium uptake by hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens grown in nutrient solution. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1994; 59: 125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cang L., Wang Q.Y., Zhou D.M., Xu H. Effects of electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of a multiple-metal contaminated soil on soil metal bioavailability and uptake by Indian mustard. Separation and Purification Technology. 2011; 79: 246–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao X.R., Ma L.Q., Chen M., Singh S.P., Harris W.G. Phosphate-induced metal immobilization in a contaminated site. Environmental Pollution. 2003; 122: 19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin F.S. III, Körner. Patterns, causes, changes, and consequences of biodiversity in the Arctic and alpine ecosystems, Arctic and Alpine Biodiversity: Patterns. Causes and Ecosystem Consequences Ecological Studies. 1995; 113: 313–320.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman P.M., Riddle M.J. Toxic effects of contaminants in polar marine environments. Environmental Science and Technology. 2005; 39: 200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford D.A., Yang M., Nedwed T. Feasibility of extracting toxic metals from soil using anhydrous ammonia. Waste Management. 1993; 13: 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convey P. Terrestrial biodiversity in Antarctica—recent advances and future challenges. Polar Science. 2010; 4: 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermatas D., Meng X.G. Stabilization/solidification (S/S) of heavy metal contaminated soils by means of a quicklime-based treatment approach. Stabilization and solidification of hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes. ASTM STP 1240. 1996; Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Dietzel M. Impact of cyclic freezing on precipitation of silica in Me-SiO2–H2O systems and geochemical implications for cryosoils and sediments. Chemical Geology. 2005; 216: 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner H.E., Lynn W.C. Dixon J.B., Weed S.B. Carbonate, halide, sulfate, and sulfide minerals. Minerals in soil environments. 1989; 2nd edn, Madison: Soil Science Society of America. 279–330.
   Google Scholar
• Duquesne S., Riddle M.J. Biological monitoring of heavy-metal contamination in coastal waters off Casey Station, Windmill Islands, East Antarctica. Polar Biology. 2002; 25: 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S.L. Heritage at risk: cultural heritage management in Antarctica. Paper presented at ICOMOS Symposium. 2007; Australia: Queensland. 19–21 July.
   Google Scholar
• Evans S.L. Icy—managing historic sites in the Antarctic: pristine wilderness, anthropogenic degradation or cultural landscape?. The Polar Journal. 2011; 1: 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Reynolds C.M., Snape I., Daugulis A.J., Barnes D.L., Williams P.J. Advances in engineered remediation for use in the Arctic and Antarctica. Polar Record. 2006; 42: 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filler D.M., Van Stempvoort D.R., Leigh M.B. Margesin R. Remediation of frozen ground contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons: feasibility and limits. Permafrost soils. 2009; Berlin: Springer. 279–301.
   Google Scholar
• Fryirs K., Snape I., Babicka N. The type and spatial distribution of past waste at the abandoned Wilkes Station, East Antarctica. Polar Record. 2013; 49: 328–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu F., Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011; 92: 407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadd G.M. Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma. 2004; 122: 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzert L., Lipski A., Hubberten H.W., Wagner D. The impact of different soil parameters on the community structure of dominant bacteria from nine different soils located on Livingston Island, south Shetland Archipelago, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2011; 76: 476–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geebelen W., Vangronsveld J., Adriano D.C., Carleer R., Clijsters H. Amendment induced immobilization of lead in a lead-spiked soil: evidence from phytotoxicity studies. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2002; 140: 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson B.D., Ptacek C.J., Lindsay M.B.J., Blowes D.W. Examining mechanisms of groundwater Hg (II) treatment by reactive materials: an EXAFS study. Environmental Science and Technology. 2011; 45: 10415–10421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore D.B. Margesin R. Application of reactive barriers operated in frozen ground. Permafrost soils. 2009; Berlin: Springer. 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Guo G., Zhou L.Q., Ma L.Q. Availability and assessment of fixing additives for the in situ remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2006; 116: 513–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafsteinsdóttir E.G, White D. A., Gore B.B. Effects of freeze–thaw cycling on metal–phosphate formation and stability in single and multi–metal systems. Environmental Pollution. 2013; 175: 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafsteinsdóttir E.G., White D.A., Gore D.B., Stark S.C. Products and stability of phosphate reactions with lead under freeze–thaw cycling in simple systems. Environmental Pollution. 2011; 159: 3496–3503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale B., Evans L., Lambert R. Effects of cement or lime on Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb and Zn mobility in field-contaminated and aged soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2012; 199: 119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen H.K., Lamas V., Gutierrez C., Nuñez P., Rojo A., Cameselle C., Ottosen L.M. Electro-remediation of copper mine tailings. Comparing copper efficiencies for two tailings of different age. Minerals Engineering. 2013; 41: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron permeable reactive barriers: a critical review. Environmental Engineering Science. 2007; 24: 401–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettiarachchi G.M., Pierzynski G.M., Ransom M.D. In situ stabilisation of soil lead using phosphorous. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2000; 30: 1214–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins M.R., Olson T.M. Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science and Technology. 2009; 43: 9432–9438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiroki M. Effects of heavy metal contamination on soil microbial population. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 1992; 38: 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister R.D., Webber P.J., Nelson F.E., Tweedie C.E. Soil thaw and temperate response to air warming varies by plant community: results from an open-top chamber experiment in northern Alaska. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research. 2007; 38: 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes A.H.L., Convey P., Bergstrom D.M. Huiskes A.H.L. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems: Antarctica as a global indicator. Trends in Antarctic terrestrial and limnetic ecosystems: Antarctica as a global indicator. 2006; Dordrecht: Springer. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin. 2003; 68: 167–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinovich I., Rutter A., Rowe R.K., McWatters R., Poland J.S. The application of geotextile and granular filters for PCB remediation. Geosynthetics International. 2008; 15: 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy A.D. Water as a limiting factor in the Antarctic terrestrial environment: a biogeographical synthesis. Arctic and Alpine Research. 1993; 25: 308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi R., Gorbacheva T.T., Gerardo R. A pilot-scale example of phytoremediation in the Arctic area: comparison of zones placed at different distances from a metal emission source. Environmental Biotechnology. 2006; 2: 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Khachaturova R. The international obligations of the Russian Federation relating to offshore oil and gas exploration and production in the Arctic. 2012; University of Tromsø. Master's thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Khan F.I., Husain T., Hejazi R. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2004; 71: 95–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S.O., Moon S.H., Kim K.W., Yun S.T. Pilot scale study of the ex situ electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from municipal wastewater sludges. Water Research. 2002; 19: 4765–4774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W.S., Kim S.O., Kim K.W. Enhanced electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from soils assisted by ion exchange membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2005; 118: 93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox A.S, Kaplan D.I, Adriano D.C, Hinton T.G., Wilson M.D. Apatite and phillipsite as sequestering agents for metals and radionuclides. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2003; 32: 515–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostarelos K., Reale D., Dermatas D., Rio E., Moon D.H. Optimum dose of lime and fly ash for treatment of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2006; 6: 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G.F., Jones Lee A. Hazardous chemical site remediation through capping: problems with long-term protection. Remediation. 1996; 7: 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Li X.D., Poon C.S., Sun H., Lo I.M.C., Kirk D.W. Heavy metal speciation and leaching behaviors in cement based solidified/stabilized waste materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2001; 82: 215–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling N., Hickey C.W., Burton G.A. Are Antarctic marine organisms sensitive to anthropogenic pollutants?. New Zealand Natural Science. 1998; 23: 106.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig R.D., McGregor R.G., Blowes D.W., Benner S.G., Mountjoy K. A permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of heavy metals. Groundwater. 2002; 40: 59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunney A.I., Zeeb B.A., Reimer K.J. Uptake of weathered DDT in vascular plants: potential for phytoremediation. Environmental Science and Technology. 2004; 38: 6147–6154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L.Q., Tcaina S.J., Logan T.J. In situ lead immobilization by apatite. Environmental Science and Technology. 1993; 27: 214–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik A. Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Environment International. 2004; 30: 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin T.A., Ruby M.V. Review of in situ remediation technologies for lead, zinc, and cadmium in soil. Remediation. 2004; 14: 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy K., Walker L., Vigoren L., Bartel J. Remediation of spilled petroleum hydrocarbons by in situ landfarming at an Arctic site. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2004; 40: 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowen T.F, Greer B.A., Lawless M. Thermal treatment and non-thermal treatment technologies for remediation of manufactured gas plant sites. Waste Management. 1996; 16: 691–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meegoda J., Ezeldin A., Fang H., Inyang H. Waste immobilization technologies, Practice Periodical Hazardous, Toxic. and Radioactive Waste Management. 2003; 7: 46–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed A.M. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils via integrated electrochemical processes. Waste Management. 1996; 16: 741–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir D.C.G., Wagemann R., Hargrave B.T., Thomas D.J., Peakall D.B., Norstrom R.J. Arctic marine ecosystem contamination. Science of the Total Environment. 1992; 122: 75–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan C.N., Yong R.N., Gibbs B.F. Remediation technologies for metal contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Engineering Geology. 2001; 60: 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naresh Kumar R., Nagendran R. Changes in nutrient profile of soil subjected to bioleaching for removal of heavy metals using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008; 156: 102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard J. Antarctic oasis: terrestrial environments and history of the Vestfold Hills. 1986; Sydney: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poissant L., Zhang H.H., Canário J., Constant P. Critical review of mercury fates and contamination in the arctic tundra ecosystem. The Science of the Total Environment. 2008; 400: 178–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland J.S, Riddle M.J, Zeeb B.A. Contaminants in the Arctic and the Antarctic: a comparison of sources, impacts, and remediation options. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 369–383.
   Google Scholar
• Perelo L.W. Review: in situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010; 177: 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter S.K, Scheckel K.G, Impellitteri C.A., Ryan J.A. Toxic metals in the environment: thermodynamic considerations for possible immobilization strategies for Pb, Cd, As and Hg. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2004; 34: 369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell S.M., Ferguson S.H., Snape I., Siciliano S.D. Fertilisation stimulates anaerobic fuel degradation of Antarctic soils by denitrifying microorganisms. Environmental Science and Technology. 2006; 40: 2011–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riis V., Babel W., Pucci O.H. Influence of heavy metals on the microbial degradation of diesel fuel. Chemosphere. 2002; 49: 559–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson S.A., Wasley J., Tobin A.K. Living on the edge—plants and global change in continental and maritime Antarctica. Global Change Biology. 2003; 9: 1681–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoppolo V., Woehler E.J., Morgan K., Clumpner C.J. Wildlife and oil in the Antarctic: a recipe for cold disaster. Polar Record. 2013; 49: 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos I.R., Silva-Filho E.V., Schaefer C.E.G.R., Albuquerque-Filho M.R., Campos L.S. Heavy metal contamination in coastal sediments and soils near the Brazilian Antarctic Station, King George Island. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2005; 50: 185–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer J.A., Cotter-Howells J.D., Watson C., Hillier S., Gadd G.M. Lead mineral transformation by fungi. Current Biology. 1999; 9: 691–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheckel K.G., Ryan J.A. Spectroscopic speciation and quantification of lead in phosphate-amended soils. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2004; 33: 1288–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppelt R.D. Plant communities at Wilkes Land. Geoecology of Antarctic ice-free coastal landscapes. Ecological Studies. 2002; 154: 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L.N., Zhang X., Chen Z.L. Removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater using bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Water Research. 2011; 45: 886–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R.I.L. Plant colonization response to climate change in the Antarctic, Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykiana Brunensis. Geographia. 2001; 25: 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Snape I., Morris C.E., Cole C.M. The use of permeable reactive barriers to control contaminant dispersal during site remediation in Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2001; 32: 157–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape I., Riddle M.J., Filler D.M., Williams P.J. Contaminants in freezing ground and associated ecosystems: key issues at the beginning of the new millennium. Polar Record. 2003; 39: 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Snape I., Riddle M.J, Stark J.S, Cole C.M, King C.K, Duquesne S., Gore D.B. Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Antarctica. Polar Record. 2001; 37: 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Sonmez O., Pierzynski G.M. Phosphorous and manages oxides effects on soil lead bioaccessibility: PBET and TCLP. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2005; 166: 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark J.S., Snape I., Riddle M.J. The effects of petroleum hydrocarbon and heavy metal contamination of marine sediments on recruitment of Antarctic soft-sediment assemblages: a field experimental investigation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2003; 283: 21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinnes E., Allen R.O., Petersen H.M., Rambaek J.P., Varskog P. Evidence of large scale heavy-metal contamination of natural surface soils in Norway from long-range atmospheric transport. Science of the Total Environment. 1997; 205: 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens G.W., Mumford K.A., Snape I., Gore D.B., Rayner J.L. Petroleum hydrocarbon remediation in Antarctica; the use of permeable reactive barriers. 2007; Australia: Melbourne. Paper presented at the 35th Australasian Chemical Engineering Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Strand P., Howard B.J., Balonov M., Tsaturov Y., Bewers J.M., Salo A., Sickel M., Bergman R., Rissanen K. Radioactive contamination in the Arctic—sources, dose assessment and potential risks. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2002; 60: 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak H.H., Lens P., van Hullebusch E.D., Dejonghe W. Developments in bioremediation of soils and sediments polluted with metals and radionuclides—1. Microbial processes and mechanisms affecting bioremediation of metal contamination and influencing metal toxicity and transport. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2005; 4: 115–156.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M.P., Camenzuli D., Kristensen L.J., Forbes M., Zahran. Environmental lead exposure risks associated with children's outdoor playgrounds. Environmental Pollution. 2013; 178: 447–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M.P, Mackay A.K, Hudson-Edwards K.A., Holz E. Soil Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn contaminants around Mount Isa city, Queensland, Australia: potential sources and risks to human health. Applied Geochemistry. 2010; 25: 841–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency. Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: evaluation of soil amendment technologies at the Crooksville/Roseville Pottery Area of Concern, Rocky Mountain Remediation Services EnvirobondTM Process. 2002. Office of Research and Development. Accessed on the internet at http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/pubs/540r02501/540R02501.pdf on 1 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency. Improving nationwide effectiveness of pump-and-treat remedies requires sustained and focused action to realize benefits. 2003. Memorandum Report 2003-P-000006. Accessed on the internet at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/cleanup/postconstruction/oigptreport.pdf on 1 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. In situ treatment technologies for contaminated soil. Engineering Forum Issue Paper EPA 542/F-06/013. Accessed on the internet at http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1000STG.pdf on 14 December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency. Green remediation best management practices: pump and treat technologies. 2009. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation Quick Reference Fact Sheet EPA 542-F-09-005. Accessed on the internet at http://clu-in.org/greenremediation/docs/GR_Fact_Sheet_P&T_12-31-2009.pdf on 1 October 2012..
   Google Scholar
• van Cauwenberghe L. Electrokinetics. Technology Overview Report TO-97-03. 1997; Pittsburgh: Ground-water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Vangronsveld J., van Assche F., Clijsters H. Reclamation of a bare industrial area contaminated by non-ferrous metals: in situ metal immobilization and revegetation. Environmental Pollution. 1995; 87: 51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkutyte J., Sillanpää M., Latostenmaa. Electrokinetic soil remediation: critical overview. Science of the Total Environment. 2002; 289: 97–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker D.A., Webber P.J., Everett K.R., Brown J. Effects of crude and diesel oil spills on plant communities at Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, and the derivation of oil spill sensitivity maps. Arctic. 1978; 31: 242–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walworth J., Pond A., Snape I., Rayner J., Ferguson S., Harvey P. Fine tuning soil nitrogen to maximize petroleum bioremediation. 2005. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sites in Arctic and Cold Climates. 8–10 May, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• White C., Shaman A.K., Gadd G.M. An integrated microbial process for the bioremediation of soil contaminated with toxic metals. Nature Biotechnology. 1998; 16: 572–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White D.A., Hafsteinsdottir E.G., Gore B.B., Thorogood G. Formation and stability of Pb-, Zn- & Cu–PO4 phases at low temperatures: implications for heavy metal fixation in polar environments. Environmental Pollution. 2012; 161: 143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wookey P.A. Climate change and biodiversity in the Arctic—Nordic perspectives. Polar Research. 2007; 26: 96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y.G., Chen S.B., Yang J.C. Effects of soil amendments on lead uptake by two vegetable crops from a lead-contaminated soil from Anhui, China. Environment International. 2004; 30: 351–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar