A trustful relationship—the importance for relatives to actively participate in the meeting with the physician

References

• Agar M. H. Institutional discourse. Text. 1985; 5: 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Andershed B, Ternestedt B-M. Development of a theoretical framework describing relatives’ involvement in palliative care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 34: 554–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson K, Larsson U. S. Politeness strategies and doctor–patient communication. On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1987; 6: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Attree M. Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and perspectives of ‘Good’ and ‘Not so Good’ quality care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 33: 456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry C. A, Stevenson F. A, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C. P. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor–patient communication in general practice. Social, Science & Medicine. 2001; 53: 487–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisecker A. E. The influence of a companion on the doctor–elderly patient interaction. Health Communication. 1989; 1: 55–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beisecker A. E, Brecheisen M. A, Ashworth J, Hayes J. Perceptions of the role of cancer patients’ companions during medical appointments. Journal of psychosocial oncology. 1996; 14: 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J. B, Brett P, Stewart M, Marshall J. N. Roles and influence of people who accompany patients on visits to the doctor. Canadian Family Physician. 1998; 44: 1644–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder. 2011; Malmö: Liber. (Methods in social science). (2nd ed.)..
   Google Scholar
• Dowsett S. M, Saul J. L, Butow P. N, Dunn S. M, Boyer M. J, Findlow R, etal. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: Preferences for a patient-centered approach. Psycho-Oncology. 2000; 9: 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske J. Introduction to communication studies. 1990; 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fortinsky R. H. Health care triads and dementia care: Integrative framework and future directions. Aging & Mental Health. 2001; 5: 35–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmour J. A. Dis/integrated care: Family caregivers and in-hospital respite care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002; 39: 546–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser M, Miller B. Caregiver and physician perspectives of medical encounters involving dementia patients. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias. 1998; 13: 70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser M, Prohaska T, Gravdal J. Elderly patients and their accompanying caregivers on medical visits. Research on Aging. 2001; 23: 326–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene M. G, Majerovitz S. D, Adelman R. D, Rizzo C. The effects of the presence of a third person on the physician–older patient medical interview. Journal of American Geriatrics Society. 1994; 42: 413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedemalm A, Schaufelberger M, Ekman I. A review of records from follow-up visits for immigrant and Swedish patients at a heart failure clinic. The European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2007; 6: 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg A, Ekman S. L. “We not them and us?” Views on the relationships and interactions between staff and relatives of older people permanently living in nursing homes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 31: 614–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzberg A, Ekman S. L, Axelsson K. ‘Relatives are a resource, but …’: Registered Nurses’ views and experiences of relatives of residents in nursing homes. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2003; 12: 431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselink G, Flink M, Olsson M, Barach P, Dudzik-Urbaniak E, Orrego C, etal. Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012; 21: 39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesslefors Arktoft E. I ord och handling. Innebörder av “att anknyta till elevers erfarenheter”, uttryckta av lärare. 1996; Göteborg: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis. By word and action: the meaning of ‘‘using pupil experiences’’,expressed by teachers). (PhD diss.). Göteborgs Studies in educational sciences 110.
   Google Scholar
• Ho A. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2008; 22: 128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson E, Bergh I, Öhlén J. The turning point: Identifying end-of-life care in everyday health care practice. Contemporary Nurse. 2007; 27(1): 107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson W, Nordberg G, Grafström M. Patterns of elderly spousal caregiving in dementia care: An observational study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 34: 804–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson M, Larsson U. S, Säljö R, Svärdsudd K. Lifestyle discussion in the provision of health care. An empirical study of patient–physician interaction. Social Science & Medicine. 1998; 1: 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junefelt K, Sätterlund Larsson U. Sociocultural theory and methods—From the standpoint of a linguist. Socio-cultural theory and methods an anthology. 2001; Vänersborg: Vänersborg University College of Health Sciences. 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller O, Werner P, Neufeld-Kroszynski G, Eidelman S. Are you talking to me?! An exploration of the triadic physician–patient–companion communication within memory clinics encounters. Patient Education and Counseling. 2012; 88: 381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissane D. W. The challenge of discrepancies in values among physicians, patients, and family members. Cancer. 2004; 100: 1771–1775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfage I. J, Audrey S, Hak T, Blazeby J. M, Abel J, Campbell R. M. Recognising the importance of ‘family time-out’ in consultations: an exploratory qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013. 3, e002144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjanson L, S Aranda, M O'Connor. Families of palliative care patients; a model of care. Palliative care nursing: A guide to practice. 1999; Melbourne: Ausmed. 279–293.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque M. S, Blanchard C. G, Ruckdeschel J. C, Blanchard E. B. The impact of family presence on the physician–cancer patient interaction. Social, Science & Medicine. 1991; 33: 1253–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson U. S, Säljö R, Aronsson K. Patient–doctor communication on smoking and drinking: Lifestyle in medical consultations. Social, Science & Medicine. 1987; 25: 1129–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenstein J. H, McCracken E. C, McWhinney I. R, Stewart M. A, Brown J. B. The patient-centered clinical method. A model for the doctor–patient interaction in family medicine. Family Practice. 1986; 3: 24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine C. The good doctor: the carer's perspective. Clinical Medicine. 2004; 4: 244–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine C, Zuckerman C. The trouble with families: Toward an ethic of accommodation. Annual Internal Medicine. 1999; 130: 148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H. Hospitalized elders and family caregivers: a topology of family worry. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005; 14: 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfmark U, Hammarström A. Older stroke patients’ negotiations within the hierarchic medical context. Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15: 778–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson A, Granskär M. Next of kin's experiences of transferring critically ill patients. Vård i Norden. 2005; 25: 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mehnert A, Lehmann C, Koch U. Doctor–patient interaction: Dealing with difficult situations. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012; 55: 1134–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler E. G. Discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. 1984; Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler E. G. Research interviewing. Context and narrative. 1986; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 2002; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paul F, Hendry C, Cabrelli L. Meeting patient and relatives’ information needs upon transfer from an intensive unit: the development and evaluation of an information booklet. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2004; 13: 396–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault M, Paquin G, Kennedy S, Desmarais J, Tardif H. Patients’ perspective on their relatives’ involvement in treatment during a short-term psychiatric hospitalization. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1999; 34: 157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petek Ster M. Teaching communication at the Medical School in Ljubljana. Acta Medica Academica. 2012; 41: 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Polit D. F, Beck C. T. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 2006; 8th ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking. 1990; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royak-Schaler R, Gadalla S. M, Lemkau J. P, Ross D. D, Alexander C, Scott D. Family perspectives on communication with healthcare providers during end-of-life cancer care. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2006; 33: 753–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydeman I, Törnkvist L, Agreus L, Dahlberg K. Being in-between and lost in the discharge process––An excursus of two empirical studies of older persons’, their relatives’, and care professionals experience. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health Well-being. 2012; 7 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v7i0.19678 1–9, 19678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai E. Y, Carpenter B. D. Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011; 85: 295–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö R. Practical learning. A socio-cultural perspective. 2000; Stockholm: Bokförlaget Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers G. M, Bethell H. W. Pacing extremely old patients: Who decides—the doctor, the patient, or the relatives?. Heart. 2004; 90: 134–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling L. M, Scatena L, Steiner J. F, Albertson G. A, Lin C. T, Cyran L, etal. The third person in the room: Frequency, role, and influence of companions during primary care medical encounters. Journal of Family Practice. 2002; 51: 685–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer S, van Oorschot B, Kohler N, Leppert K, Steibach K, Hausmann C, etal. The patient and his family. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie. 2005; 55: 298–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander S. Om kommunikation i vården och medicinsk information. (Health care communication and medical information). SPOV. 1991; 11: 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. Lagen om ändring i hälso-och sjukvårdslagen [Swedish Health and Medical Service Act]. 1982; Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. (amended from 2011:1576). Retrieved April 17, 2012, from http://www.notisum.se 763.
   Google Scholar
• Shields C. G, Epstein R. M, Fiscella K, Franks P, McCann R, McCormick K, etal. Influence of accompanied encounters on patient-centeredness with older patients. Journal of American Board Family Medicine. 2005; 18: 344–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silliman R. A. Caregiving issues in geriatric medical encounter. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2000; 16: 51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data method for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2001; London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Method for analyzing talk, text and interaction. 2006; 3rd ed., London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Awareness of meeting of elderly. 1997; Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. 170.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Bill. National development plan for health and social care for the elderly. 2005/06. Retrieved January 16, 2013, from: http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/5692/a/60665 115.
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. The elderly mission. 1998; Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Your safety and security as a patient. 2008; Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. Riktlinjer för etisk värdering av medicinsk humanforskning. MRF-rapport. [Swedish Research Council. Guidelines for the ethical evaluation of medical research]. 2003; Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L. S. Thought and language. 1987; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch J. Voices of mind. 1998; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilz G, Meichsner F. Involving family members of chronically ill patients in physician–patient communication. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012; 55: 1125–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff J. L, Clayman M. L, Rabins P, Cook M. A, Roter D. L. An exploration of patient and family engagement in routine primary care visits. Health Expectations. 2012. 16, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff J. L, Roter D. L. Older adults’ mental health function and patient-centered care: does the presence of a family companion help or hinder communication?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012; 27: 661–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Information needs for research, policy and action on ageing and older persons: Definition of an older or elderly person. 2003; Switzerland: Geneva.
   Google Scholar