Perceiving what you intend to do from what you do: evidence for embodiment in social interactions

References

• Aarts H., Gollwitzer P. M., Hassin R. R. Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004; 87: 23–37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison T., Puce A., Mc Carthy G. Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000; 4: 267–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini E., Costantini M., Sinigaglia C. Grasping with the eyes. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2011; 106: 1437–1442. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1152/jn.00118.2011..
   Google Scholar
• Ansuini C., Cavallo A., Bertone C., Becchio C. The visible face of intention: Why kinematics matters. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014; 5: 815. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00815..
   Google Scholar
• Argyle M., Cook M. Gaze and mutual gaze. 1976; Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apperly I. A., Butterfill S. A. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?. Psychological Review. 2009; 116: 953–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barresi J., Moore C. Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1996; 19: 107–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou L. W. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2003; 18: 513–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou L. W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 2008; 59: 617–645. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639..
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou L. W. Mirroring as pattern completion inferences within situated conceptualizations. Cortex. 2013; 49: 2951–2953. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.010..
   Google Scholar
• Becchio C., Bertone C., Castiello U. How the gaze of others influences object processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008; 12: 254–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.005..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchio C., Sartori L., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement. Cognition. 2008a; 106: 894–912. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.004..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchio C., Sartori L., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008b; 17: 557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.003..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchio C., Sartori L., Castiello U. Toward you: The social side of actions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2010; 19: 183–188. doi: 10.1177/0963721410370131..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher J.-D., Pattacini U., Lelong A., Bailly G., Elisei F., Fagel S., etal. I reach faster when I see you look: Gaze effects in human–human and human–robot face-to-face cooperation. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2012; 6: 3. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00003..
   Google Scholar
• Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition. 2000; 44: 124–143. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225..
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade T., Méary D., Orliaguet J.-P., Decety J. Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study. Neuroreport. 2001; 12: 3669–3674.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand T. L., Bargh J. A. The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999; 76: 893–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieffi S., Iachini T., Iavarone A., Messina G., Viggiano A., Monda M. Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task. Experimental Brain Research. 2014; 232: 1327–1334. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3851-y..
   Google Scholar
• Cleret de Langavant L., Remy P., Trinkler I., McIntyre J., Dupoux E., Berthoz A., etal. Behavioral and neural correlates of communication via pointing. PLoS One. 2011; 6: 17719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017719..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleret de Langavant L., Trinkler I., Remy P., Thirioux B., McIntyre J., Berthoz A., etal. Viewing another person's body as a target object: A behavioural and PET study of pointing. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50: 1801–1813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefani E., Innocenti A., Secchi C., Papa V., Gentilucci M. Type of gesture, valence, and gaze modulate the influence of gestures on observer's behaviors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013; 7: 542. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00542..
   Google Scholar
• De Vignemont F., Haggard P. Action observation and execution: What is shared?. Social Neuroscience. 2008; 3: 421–433. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1080/17470910802045109..
   Google Scholar
• Elsner C., Falck-Ytter T., Gredebäck G. Humans anticipate the goal of other people's point-light actions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2012; 3: 120. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00120..
   Google Scholar
• Ferri F., Campione G. C., Dalla Volta R., Gianelli C., Gentilucci M. Social requests and social affordances: How they affect the kinematics of motor sequences during interactions between conspecifics. PLoS One. 2011; 6: 15855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015855..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filimon F., Nelson J. D., Hagler D. J., Sereno M. I. Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage. 2007; 37: 1315–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons G. M., Bargh J. A. Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 84: 148–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J. R., Johansson R. S. Action plans used in action observation. Nature. 2003; 424: 769–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008; 17: 535–543. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003..
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S., Varga S. Social constraints on the direct perception of emotions and intentions. Topoi. 2014; 33: 185–199. doi: 10.1007/s11245-013-9203-x..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese V. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003; 358: 517–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George N., Conty L. Facing the gaze of others. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008; 38: 197–207. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.03.001..
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou I., Becchio C., Glover S., Castiello U. Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition. 2007; 102: 415–433. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.008..
   Google Scholar
• Gergely G., Nadasdy Z., Csibra G., Biro S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition. 1995; 56: 165–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelli C., Scorolli C., Borghi A. M. Acting in perspective: The role of body and language as social tools. Psychological Research. 2013; 77: 40–52. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0401-0..
   Google Scholar
• Goldman A., de Vignemont F. Is social cognition embodied?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009; 13: 154–159. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.007..
   Google Scholar
• González-Perilli F., Ellis R. I don't get you. Action observation effects inverted by kinematic variation. Acta Psychologica. 2015; 157: 114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.010..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R., Kujala M. V. Brain basis of human social interaction: From concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews. 2009; 89: 453–479. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2007..
   Google Scholar
• Hassin R. R., Aarts H., Ferguson M. J. Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2005; 41: 129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.008..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider F., Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology. 1944; 57: 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermsdörfer J., Hentze S., Goldenberg G. Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44: 1642–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.023..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermsdörfer J., Li Y., Randerath J., Goldenberg G., Johannsen L. Tool use without a tool: Kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage. Experimental Brain Research. 2012; 218: 201–214. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3021-z..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti A., De Stefani E., Bernardi N. F., Campione G. C., Gentilucci M. Gaze direction and request gesture in social interactions. PLoS One. 2013; 7: e36390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036390..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob P. Coello Y., Bartolo A. Embodied cognition, communication and the language faculty. Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. 2013; New York: Psychology Press. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob P., Jeannerod M. The motor theory of social cognition: A critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005; 9: 21–25. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.003..
   Google Scholar
• Kilner J. M., Paulignan Y., Blakemore S. J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology. 2003; 13: 522–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinke C. L. Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin. 1986; 100: 78–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton S. R. H., Watt R. J., Bruce V. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000; 4: 50–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewkowicz D., Delevoye-Turrell Y., Bailly D., Andry P., Gaussier P. Reading motor intention through mental imagery. Adaptive Behavior. 2013; 21: 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepelt R., Cramon D. Y. V., Brass M. What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008; 34: 578–591. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578..
   Google Scholar
• Long D., Golding J. Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension?. Discourse Processes. 1993; 16: 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguinness C., Setti A., Roudaia E., Kenny R. A. Does that look heavy to you? Perceived weight judgment in lifting actions in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013; 7: 795. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00795..
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring B., Tversky B., Ohgishi M., Schiano D. J. Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation. 2003; 3: 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Manera V., Becchio C., Cavallo A., Sartori L., Castiello U. Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research. 2011; 211: 547–556. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2649-4..
   Google Scholar
• Manera V., Del Giudice M., Bara B. G., Verfaillie K., Becchio C. The second-agent effect: Communicative gestures increase the likelihood of perceiving a second agent. PLoS One. 2011; 6: 22650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022650..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteniuk R. G., MacKenzie C. L., Jeannerod M., Athenes S., Dugas C. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1987; 41: 365–378. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1037/h0084157..
   Google Scholar
• McAleer P., Pollick F. E. Understanding intention from minimal displays of human activity. Behavior Research Methods. 2008; 40: 830–839. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.830..
   Google Scholar
• Méary D., Chary C., Palluel-Germain R., Orliaguet J.-P. Visual perception of writing and pointing movements. Perception. 2005; 34: 1061–1067. doi: 10.1068/p3388..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff A.N. Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology. 1995; 31: 838–850. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText].
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff A. N., Gopnik A. Baron-Cohen S., Tager-Flusberg H. The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing theories of mind. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. 1993; Oxford: Oxford University Press. 335–66.
   Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek R. G. J., Bosga J., Hulstijn M., Miedl S. Joint action coordination in transferring objects. Experimental Brain Research. 2007; 180: 333–343. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText].
   Google Scholar
• Newman-Norlund R. D., van Schie H. T., van Zuijlen A. M., Bekkering H. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience. 2007; 10: 817–818. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1038/nn1911..
   Google Scholar
• Newtson D. A., Engquist G., Bois J. The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977; 35: 847–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obhi S. S. The amazing capacity to read intentions from movement kinematics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012; 6: 162. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00162..
   Google Scholar
• Ondobaka S., de Lange F. P., Newman-Norlund R. D., Wiemers M., Bekkering H. Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction. Psychological Science. 2011; 23: 30–35. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1177/0956797611424163..
   Google Scholar
• Patel D., Fleming S. M., Kilner J. M. Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2012; 279: 4853–4860. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1847..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus M. Action mirroring and action understanding: An ideomotor and attentional account. Psychological Research. 2011; 76: 760–767. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0385-9..
   Google Scholar
• Poynor D. V., Morris R. K. Inferred goals in narratives: Evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning Memory and Cognition. 2003; 29: 3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesque F., Coello Y. For your eyes only: Effect of confederate's eye level on reach-to-grasp action. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014; 5: 1407. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01407..
   Google Scholar
• Quesque F., Lewkowicz D., Delevoye-Turrell Y. N., Coello Y. Effects of social intention on movement kinematics in cooperative actions. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2013; 7: 14. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00014..
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi A. W., Apperly I. A., Samson D. Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition. 2010; 117: 230–236. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.003..
   Google Scholar
• Richerson P. J., Boyd R. Eibl-Eibisfeldt I., Salter F. The evolution of human ultra-sociality. Ideology, warfare, and indoctrinability. 1998; New York: Berghan Books. 71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rimé B., Boulanger B., Laubin P. The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motivation and Emotion. 1985; 9: 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotman G. Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2006; 96: 1358–1369. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1152/jn.00227.2006..
   Google Scholar
• Runeson S., Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1983; 112: 585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson D., Apperly I.A., Braithwaite J., Andrews B. Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010; 36(5): 1255–1266. [PubMedAbstract].
   Google Scholar
• Sartori L., Becchio C., Bara B. G., Castiello U. Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics?. Consciousness and Cognition. 2009; 18: 766–772. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.06.004..
   Google Scholar
• Sartori L., Becchio C., Castiello U. Cues to intention: The role of movement information. Cognition. 2011; 119: 242–252. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.014..
   Google Scholar
• Sartori L., Bucchioni G., Castiello U. When emulation becomes reciprocity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2013; 8: 662–669. [PubMedAbstract] [PubMedCentralFullText] doi: 10.1093/scan/nss044..
   Google Scholar
• Sartori L., Cavallo A., Bucchioni G., Castiello U. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research. 2011; 211: 557–568. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2650-y..
   Google Scholar
• Sartori L., Cavallo A., Bucchioni G., Castiello U. From simulation to reciprocity: The case of complementary actions. Social Neuroscience. 2012; 7: 146–158. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.586579..
   Google Scholar
• Schilbach L. A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010; 11: 449–449. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1038/nrn2805-c1..
   Google Scholar
• Scholl B. J., Tremoulet P. D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2000; 4: 299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Representing others’ actions: Just like one's own?. Cognition. 2003; 88: B11–B21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senju A., Johnson M. H. The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2009; 13: 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah J. Y. The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85: 424–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremoulet P. D., Feldman J. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception. 2000; 29: 943–951. [PubMedAbstract] doi: 10.1068/p3101..
   Google Scholar
• Tversky B., Martin Hard B. Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective taking. Cognition. 2009; 110: 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Vallacher R. R., Wegner D. M. What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review. 1987; 94: 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Vallacher R. R. Sorrentino R. M., Higgins E. T. Action identification. Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. 1986; New York: Guilford Press. 550–582.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson E. O. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. 1975; Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar