95
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Air pressure dependence of cosmic ray intensity

Methods and results of a statistical analysis on neutron monitor data

Pages 179-197 | Received 24 Nov 1966, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Aitken, A. C. 1934. On least squares and linear combination of observations. Proc. of Royal Society of Edinburgh 55, 42–47.
  • Bachelet, F. et at. 1964. Attenuation coefficients of the cosmic-ray nucleonic component in the lower atmosphere. Ii Nuovo Cimento 35, 23–35.
  • Bachelet, F., Balata, P. & Iucci, N. 1965. Some properties of the radiation recorded by the IGY cosmic-ray neutron monitors in the lower atmo-sphere. It Nuovo Cimento 40, 250.
  • Bartlett, M. S. 1962. An Introduction to Stochastic Processes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Blackman, R. B. & Tukey, J. W. 1959. Measurement of Power Spectra from the Point of View of Com-munications Engineering. New York, Dover Pub-lications.
  • Cochrane, D. &; °mutt, G. H. 1949. Application of least squares regression to relationships containing autocorrelated error terms. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 44, 32–61.
  • Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. 1950. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regressin. I, Biome-trika 37, 409–428.
  • Durbin, J. 1960. Estimation of parameters in time-series regression models. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 22, 139–153.
  • Dyring, E. 1962. Statistical studies of the perform-ance of cosmic ray recording instruments. Tenus 14, 33–43.
  • Dyring, R., Lindgren, S. & Martinelle, S. 1966. Solar cycle variation in the attenuation length of the cosmic ray nucleon component. Arkiv f. Geofysik 5, 87–90.
  • Grenander, U. 1954. On the estimation of regression coefficients in the case of an autocorrelated distur-bance. Ann. Math. Stat. 25, 252–272.
  • Griffiths et at. 1966. The variation of the barometric coefficient of the Leeds neutron monitor during the solar cycle 1954-1965. Journal of Geophysical Research 71 (No. 7), 1895-1898.
  • Hannan, E. J. 1963. Regression for time series. Proc. of the symp. on time series analysis. Ed. M. Rosenblatt, Wiley.
  • Hildreth, Cliffort & Lu, John Y. 1960. Demand Relations With Autocorrelated Disturbances, Michigan State University, Agricultural Experi-ment Station. Technical Bulletin 276.
  • Klein, L. 1953. A Textbook of Econometrics. Row, Peterson and Company, New York.
  • Lapointe, S. M. & Rose, D. C. 1962. A statistical analysis of the barometer coefficients for cosmic-ray intensities. Can. Journ. Phys. 40, 687.
  • Lindgren, S. 1961. On the pressure dependence of the cosmic ray intensity recorded by the standard neutron monitor. Tenn.!? 14, 44–48.
  • Mathews, P. M. 1958. Atmospheric effects on cosmic ray intensity at sea level. Can. J. Phys. 37, 85–101.
  • McCracken, K. G. & Johns, D. H. 1959. The attenua-tion length of the high energy nucleonic compo-nent of the cosmic radiation near sea level. II Nuovo Cimento 13, 96.
  • Wise, 1955. The autocorrelation function and the spectral density function. Biometrika 42, 151–159.
  • Wold, H. 1950. On least squares regression with autocorrelated variables and residuals. Bull. Inst. Int. Statist. 29 (No. 2).
  • Wold, H. 1953. Demand Analysis. A Study in Econometrics, New York, Wiley.
  • Wold, H. 1965, A graphic introduction to stochastic processes. In H. Wold, ed.: Bibliography on Time Series and Stochastic Processes, 7-76, Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.
  • Wold, H. 1966. Nonlinear Estimation by Iterative Least Squares Procedures. In Festschrift Jerzy Ney-man, ed.: F. David, New York, Wiley and Sons.