Statistical methods for interpreting Monte Carlo ensemble forecasts

References

• Anderson, J. L. 1997. The impact of dynamical con-straints on the selection of initial conditions for ensemble predictions: low-order perfect model results. Mon. Wea. Rev. 125, 2969–2983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atger, F. 1999. Tubing: an alternative to clustering for the classification of ensemble forecasts. Weather and Forecasting 14, 741–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmeijer, J. 1996. Constructing fast-growing perturba-tions for the nonlinear regime. J. Atmos. Sc i. 53, 2838–2851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmeijer, J., Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N. 1999.3D-Var Hessian singular vectors and their potential use in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 125, 2333–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkmeijer, J., Gijzen, Van M. and Bouttier, F. 1998. Singular vectors and estimates of the analysis error covariance metric Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 124, 1695–1713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brankovic, C. and Palmer, T. N. 1997. Atmospheric seasonal predictability and estimates of ensemble size Mon. Wea. Re v. 125, 859–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brankovic, C., Palmer, T. N., Molteni, F., Tibaldi, S. and Cubasch, U. 1990. Extended-range predictions with ECMWF models: time-lagged ensemble forecasting. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 116, 867–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizza, R. 1994. Sensitivity of optimal unstable struc-tures. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 120, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizza, R. 1997. Potential forecast skill of ensemble prediction and spread and skill distributions of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Mon. Wea. Re v. 125, 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizza, R., Gelaro, R., Molteni, F. and Palmer, T. N. 1997. The impact of increased resolution on predictab-ility studies with singular vectors. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 123, 1007–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N. 1995. The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sc i. 52, 1434–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buizza, R., Petroliagis, T., Palmer, T. N., Barkmeijer, J., Hamrud, M., Hollingsworth, A., Simmons, A. and Wedi, N. 1998. Impact of model resolution and ensemble size on the performance of an ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 124, 1935–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, G. and Stephenson, D. B. 1999. The “Normal-ity” of El Nifio. Geophys. Res. Letters 26, 1027-1030. Carnevale, G. F. 1982. Statistical features of the evolution of two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid. Mech. 122, 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, G. F., Frisch, U. and Salmon, R. 1981. H theorems in statistical fluid dynamics. J. Phys. A 14, 1701–1718.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, G. F. and Holloway, G. 1982. Information decay and the predictability of turbulent flows. J. Fluid. Mech. 116, 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charney, J. G., Fjortoft, R. and von Neumann, J. 1950. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus 2, 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, T. F. and Cox, M. A. A. 1994. Multidimensional scaling. Chapman and Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrendorfer, M. 1994. The Liouville equation and its potential usefulness for the prediction of forecast skill. Part I: Theory. Mon. Wea. Re v. 122, 703–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrendorfer, M. and Tribbia, J. J. 1997. Optimal predic-tion of forecast error covariances through singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sc i. 54, 286–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. S. 1969a The role of initial uncertainties in prediction. J. Appl. Meteor. 8, 190–198.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. S. 1969b. Stochastic dynamic predic-tion. Tellus 21, 739–759.
   Google Scholar
• Hadamard, J. 1898. Les surfaces a courbures opposées et leurs lignes géodesiques. J. Math. Pure et Appl. 4, 27–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hamill, T. M. and Colucci, S. J. 1998 Evaluation of Eta-RSM ensemble probabilistic precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Re v. 126, 711–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtekamer, P. L. and Derome, J. 1995. Methods for ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Re v. 123, 2181–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H. and Mitchell, H. L. 1996. A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon. Wea. Re v. 124, 1225–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. 1980. Statistical physics. Butterworth Heinemann, 3rd edition, vol. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, C. E. 1971. Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sc i. 28, 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leith, C. E. 1974. Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Wea. Re v. 102, 409–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leith, C. E. and Kraichnan, R. H. 1972. Predictability of turbulent flows. J. Atmos. Sc i. 29, 1041–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sc i. 20, 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1969a. The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus 21, 289-307.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E. N. 1969b. Three approaches to atmospheric predictability. Bulletin American Met. Soc. 50, 345-349.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. 1970. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. 1974. Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normal-ity and robustness studies. Sankhyti. The Indian Journal of Statistics 36, 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T. and Bibby, J. M. 1979. Multi-variate analysis. Academic Press Limited, London.
   Google Scholar
• Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N. and Petroliagis, T. 1996. The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 122, 73–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. M. 1988. The impact of ensemble forecasts on predictability. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 114, 463–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. 1890. Sur les equations de la dynamique dele probléme de trois corps. Acta Math. 13, 1–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ruelle, D. 1989. Chaotic evolution and strange attractors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Selten, F. M. 1997. Baroclinic empirical orthogonal functions as basis functions in an atmospheric model. Mon. Wea. Re v. 54,2100–2114.
   Google Scholar
• Sivillo, J. K., Ahlquist, J. E. and Toth, Z. 1997. An ensemble forecasting primer. Weather and Forecasting 12, 809–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelly, W. C. and Henderson-Sellers, A. 1996. Grid box or grid point: what type of data do GCMs deliver to climate impacts researchers? Int. J. Climatol. 16, 1079–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, J. 1969. Problems and promises of deter-ministic extended range forecasting. Bulletin American Met. Soc. 50, 286–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A. 1996. Accountability and error in ensemble forecasting. In: Palmer, T. (ed.): Predictabilty, ECMWF November 1997 Workshop on Predictability, vol. 1, pp. 351–368. Reading, UK. ECMWF.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A. and Gilmour, I. 1997. Accountability and internal consistence in ensemble formation. In: Palmer, T. (ed.): Predictabilty, ECMWF November 1997 Workshop on Predictability, vol. 2, p.15. Reading, UK. ECMWF.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, D. B., Rupa Kumar, K., Doblas-Reyes, F.-J., Royer, J.-F., Chauvin, F. and Pezzulli, S. 1999. Extreme daily rainfall events and their impact on ensemble forecasts of the Indian monsoon. Mon. Wea. Re v. 127,1954–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, D. B. 1997. Correlation of spatial climate/weather maps and the advantages of using the mahal-anobis metric in predictions. Tellus 49A, 513–527.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, G. 1988. Linear algebra and its applications. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 3rd edition.
   Google Scholar
• Stroe, R. and Royer, J.-F. 1993. Comparison of different error growth formulas and predictability estimation in numerical extended-range forecasts. Ann. Geophys-icae 11, 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, O. G. 1951. Mathematics and the future of met-eorology. Weather 6, 291–296.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist, 27 March 1999. Economics focus: ik la mode. 350,90.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. D. 1957. Uncertainty of initial state as a factor in the predictability of large scale atmospheric flow patterns. Tellus 9, 275–295.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. 1991. Circulation patterns in phase space: a multinormal distribution? Mon. Wea. Re v. 119, 1501–1511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. 1995. Degrees of freedom in Northern Hemi-sphere circulation data. Tellus 47A, 457–472.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. 1993. Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 74,2317–2330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. 1997. Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Re v. 125, 3297–3319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, Z., Kalnay, E., Tracton, S. M., Wobus, R. and Irwin, J. 1997. A synoptic evaluation of the NCEP ensemble. Weather and Forecasting 12, 140–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. M., Cheng, X. and Sun, D. 1991. Does low-frequency atmospheric variability exhibit regime-like behavior? Tellus 43AB, 16-26.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and cosmology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, J. S. and Loughe, A. F. 1998. The relationship between ensemble spread and ensemble mean skill. Mon. Wea. Re v. 126, 3292–3302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwiers, F. W. 1996. Interannual variability and predict-ability in an ensemble of AMIP climate simulations conducted with the CCC GCM2. Climate Dynamics 12,825–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar