65
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examination of the sensitivity of forecast precipitation rates to possible perturbations of initial conditions

, &
Pages 88-105 | Received 12 Oct 2001, Accepted 03 Jul 2002, Published online: 15 Dec 2016

References

  • Anthes, R. A., Kuo, Y.-H., Baumhefner, D. P., Errico, R. M. and Bettge, T. W. 1985. Predictability of mesoscale mo-tions. Issues in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modeling, Part B, Adv. Geophys. 28, 159–202.
  • Bourke, W. and McGregor, J. L. 1983. A nonlinear vertical mode initialization scheme for a limited area prediction model. Mon. Wea. Re v. 111, 2285–2297.
  • Davies, H. C. and Turner, R. E. 1977. Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: An examination of the technique. Q. J. R. Meteorol. 103, 225–245.
  • Ehrendorfer, M., Errico, R. M. and Raeder, K. D. 1999. Singular-vector perturbation growth in a primitive-equation model with moist physics. J. Atmos. Sc i. 56, 1627–1648.
  • Errico, R. M. 1997. What is an adjoint model. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 2577–2591.
  • Errico, R. M. 2000a. Interpretations of the total energy and rotational energy norms applied to determination of singular vectors. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126A, 1581–1599.
  • Errico, R. M. 2000b. The dynamical balance of singular vectors in a primitive equation model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126A, 1601–1618.
  • Errico, R. M. and Baumhefner, D. P. 1987. Predictability experiments using a high-resolution limited-area model. Mon. Wea. Re v. 115,488–504.
  • Errico, R. M. and Raeder, K. D. 1999. An examination of the accuracy of the linearization of a mesoscale model with moist physics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 169–195.
  • Errico, R. M. and Vulciéevié, T. 1992. Sensitivity analysis using an adjoint of the PSU-NCAR mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Re v. 120, 1644–1660.
  • Errico, R. M., Vulcicevic, T. and Raeder, K. 1993. Examina-tion of the accuracy of a tangent linear model. Tellus 45A, 462–497.
  • Errico, R. M., Raeder, K. and Vulciéevié, T. 1994. Description of the NCAR Mesoscale Adjoint Modeling System version/(MAMS/).NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-410±IA. ( Available from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.)
  • Errico, R. M., Ehrendorfer, M. and Raeder, K. D. 2001. The spectra of singular values in a regional model. Tellus 53A, 317–332.
  • Franke, R. and Barker, E. 2000. Vertical correlation functions for temperature and relative humidity errors. Mon. Wea. Re v.,128, 3962–3981.
  • Gelaro, R., Reynolds, C. A., Langland, R. H. and Rohaly, G. D. 2000. A predictability study using geostationary satellite wind observations during NORPEX. Mon. Wea. Re v. 128, 3789–3807.
  • Hall, M. C. G., Cacuci, D. G. and Schlesinger, M. E. 1982. Sensitivity analysis of a radiative convective model by the adjoint method. J. Atmos. Sc i. 39, 2083–2050.
  • Hoskins, B. J., Buizza, R. and Badger, J. 1999. The nature of singular vector growth and structure. Q. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 126, 1565–1580.
  • Klinker, E., Rabier, F. and Gelaro, R. 1998. Estimation of key analysis errors using the adjoint technique. Q. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 124, 1909–1933.
  • Langland, R. H. and Errico, R. M. 1995. Comments on “Use of an adjoint model for finding triggers for Alpine lee cyclo-genesis.” Mon. Wea. Re v. 124, 757–760.
  • Langland, R. H., Elsberry, R. L. and Errico, R. M. 1995. Eval-uation of physical processes in an idealized extratropical cyclone using adjoint sensitivity. Q. J. R. MeteoroL Soc. 121, 1349–1386.
  • Langland, R. H., Elsberry, R. L. and Errico, R. M. 1996. Adjoint sensitivity of an idealized extratropical cyclone with moist physical processes. Q. J. Roy. MeteoroL Soc. 122, 1891–1920.
  • Lewis, J., Raeder, K. D. and Errico, R. 2001. Vapor flux associated with return flow over the Gulf of Mexico: A sensitivity study using adjoint modeling. Tellus 53A, 74–93.
  • Moorthi, S. and Suarez, M. J. 1992. Relaxed Aralcawa—Schubert: A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon. Wea. Re v. 120, 978–1002.
  • Mullen, S. L. and Baumhefner, D. P. 1989. The impact of initial condition uncertainty on numerical simulations of large-scale explosive cyclo-genesis. Mon. Wea. Re v. 117, 2800–2821.
  • Oortwijn, J. and Barkmeijer, J. 1995. Perturbations that optimally trigger weather regimes. J. Atmos. Sc i. 52, 3952–3944.
  • Rabier, E, Klinker, E., Courtier, P. and Hollingsworth, A. 1996. Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Q. J. R. MeteoroL 122, 121–150.
  • Stensrud, D. J., Bao, J.-W. and Warner, T. T. 2000. Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensembles of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Re v. 128, 2077–2107.